Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T09:25:56.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Silent World of Collaborators from Different Disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2021

Joseph Goldstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For ten years, starting in 1958, Jay Katz and I were each other's teachers and each other's students in a teaching and writing collaboration at the Yale Law School. What was the nature of the collaborative relationship that Jay the physician-psychiatrist-psychoanalyst-in-training and I, trained in law and political science, expected to establish? Were we making informed choices when we entered into, carried out and ended our collaboration? Did we recome and acknowledge to ourselves and to each other why we were doing what we did? In accord with Jay's prescriptions in The Silent World of Doctor and Patient—a monumental contribution to our thinking about another collaboration—did we seek to help each other understand the decisions we had reached?

A word, first, about the kind of collaboration described in this essay. In a fundamental sense all intellectual and scholarly work—even work in the creative arts—is collaborative. All who engage in these activities build on or respond to the work of others.

Type
Intimate Choices
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 16 , Issue 3-4 , Winter 1988 , pp. 248 - 255
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Katz, J., The Silent World of Doctor and Patient (New York: Free Press, 1984).Google Scholar
See e.g. F.V. Harper & J.H. Skolnick, Problems of the Family, preface iii, (Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill, rev. ed. 1962) for an early attempt at Yale by a lawyer and sociologist to integrate “the various disciplines which deal with family affairs”—a selection of appellate decisions and a compilation of “non-legal readings” from the social sciences.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. & Katz, J., The Family and the Law (New York: Free Press, 1964) 2.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., “For Harold Lasswell: Some Reflections on Human Dignity, Entrapment, Informed Consent, and the Plea Bargain”, Yale Law Journal 683 (1975), 84.Google Scholar
Katz, J., “Reflections on Teaching Law and Medicine”, Houston Law Review 25 (1988), 475–476 (Hereafter referred to as Reflections.)Google Scholar
Katz, J. Goldstein, J. & Dershowitz, A., Psychoanalysis, Psychiatry and Law, 2, 422 (New York: The Free Press, 1967). Richard Donnelly, until his death, was a member of the collaborative team. Later Alan Dershowitz, while still a third-year law student, joined us.Google Scholar
Goldstein & Katz, supra note 3, 1.Google Scholar
Id.: 2.Google Scholar
Ibid.Google Scholar
Id.: 4.Google Scholar
Id.: 9.Google Scholar
Goldstein & Katz, “Dangerousness and Mental Illness—-Some Observations on the Decision to Release Persons Acquitted by Reason of Insanity”, 70 Yale Law Journal, 223 (1960), simultaneously published under the reverse authorship of Kau & Goldstein in 131 Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 404 (1960); Goldstein, & Katz, , “Abolish the Insanity Defense—Why Not?”, 72 Yale Law Journal. 883 (1964), simultaneously published under the reverse authorship or Katz & Goldstein in 138 Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 57 (1964).Google Scholar
Reprinted in J. Goldstein, The Hampstead Child-Therapy Clinic and Legal Education, Psychoanalytic Study of the Child Monograph #5 (1975), 15.Google Scholar
Reprinted in Goldstein, J., “Anna Freud in Law,” The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 3, 4 (1984).Google Scholar
Goldstein & Katz, supra note 3, preface viii.Google Scholar
Katz, supra note 5, 477.Google Scholar
Id.: 478. In my independent writings on children and the law I would note that I was “a lawyer who happens to be a psychoanalyst (not a psychoanalyst who happens to be a lawyer).” Goldstein, J., “Psychoanalysis and a Jurisprudence of Child Placement—with Special Emphasis on the Role of Legal Counsel for Children”, 1 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 109 (1978).Google Scholar
Katz, supra note 5, 477–78 (Emphasis supplied).Google Scholar
Katz, supra note 1, particularly 102–04.Google Scholar
Anna Freud accepted a joint invitation from the Law School and the Child Study Center at Yale to be a visiting lecturer in the spring of 1968 to work on drafting a model code of procedure for the disposition of children. She had stimulated a collaborative tie between the two departments that continues to this day. See Goldstein, J., “Anna Freud” 92 Yale Law Journal 219 (1982).Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. Freud, A. Solnit, A.J. and Goldstein, S., In the Best Interests of the Child (1986) 16–17. See generally Chapter 2, “Untangling Professional and Personal Beliefs.”Google Scholar