Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T02:09:47.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Broadened Civil Commitment Laws on Length of Stay in a State Mental Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2021

Glenn L. Pierce ,
William H. Fisher  and
Mary L. Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the 1950s and 1960s considerable attention was focused on the deleterious effects of prolonged hospitalization for mental illness. Sociologists such as Goffman and clinicians such as Wing identified the psychosocial and clinical processes that led patients to become increasingly dependent on the routine of the hospital and progressively less able to live in the community. Along with this concern came growing criticism of the legal processes by which individuals were committed to and retained in state hospitals and of the procedural protections afforded them.

Landmark court decisions such as Lessard v. Schmidt led to sweeping changes in commitment laws across the nation during the 1970s. California's Lanterman-Petris-Short Act served as a model for the laws of many states by narrowing the substantive grounds for commitment and imposing procedural safeguards on the commitment process.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 13 , Issue 6 , December 1985 , pp. 290 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The research for this paper was supported by grant MH-36220 from the NIMH.

References

Goffman, E., Asylums (Doubleday, Garden City, N.J. 1961); Wing, J., Institutionalization of Mental Hospitals, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1: 38 (1962).Google Scholar
Scheff, T.J., Being Mentally Ill, 1st ed. (Aidine, Chicago, 1966); Miller, D. Schwartz, M., County Lunacy Commission Hearings: Some Observations of Commitment to a State Mental Hospital, Social Problems 1(14): 26 (Summer 1966); L. Kutner, The Illusion of Due Process in Commitment Proceedings, Northwestern University Law Review 57(4): 383 (September/October 1982).Google Scholar
Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078 (E.D. Wisc. 1972); vacated and remanded, 414 U.S. 473 (1974); order on remand, 379 F. Supp. 1376 (E.D. Wisc. 1974); vacated and remanded, 421 U.S. 957 (1975); order reinstated on remand, 413 F. Supp. 1318 (E.D. Wisc. 1976).Google Scholar
Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS), Cal. Welf. and Inst. Code §§5000 et seq. (West 1984).Google Scholar
Id. at §§5254, 5256, 5300-9.Google Scholar
For Nebraska, , see Luckey, J.W. Berman, J.J., Effects of a New Commitment Law on Involuntary Admissions and Service Utilization Patterns, Law and Human Behavior 3(3): 149 (1979). For Arizona, see Wexler, D.B., Mental Health Law and the Movement Toward Voluntary Treatment, California Law Review 62(3): 671 (May). For California, see ENKI Research Institute, The Burden of the Mentally Disordered on Law Enforcement (ENKI, Chatsworth, Cal., 1973; C.A.B. Warren, Involuntary Commitment for Mental Disorder: The Application of California's Lanterman-Petris-Short Act, Law and Society Review 11(4): 629 (Spring 1977); H.R. Lamb, A. Sorkin, J. Zusman, Legislating Social Control of the Mentally Ill in California, American Journal of Psychiatry 138(3): 334 (March 1981). For Washington see J.L. Durham, G.L. Pierce, Beyond Deinstitutionalization: A Commitment Law in Evolution, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 33(3): 216 (March 1982); G.L. Pierce, M.L. Durham, W. Fisher, The Impact of Broadened Civil Commitment Standards on Admission to State Mental Hospitals, American Journal of Psychiatry 142(1): 104 (January 1985).Google Scholar
Wanck, B., Two Decades of Involuntary Hospitalization Legislation, American Journal of Psychiatry 141(1): 33, 36–37 (January 1984).Google ScholarPubMed
Abramson, M.F., The Criminalization of Mentally Disordered Behavior: A Possible Side Effect of a New Mental Health Law, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 23(4): 101, 103–5 (April 1972).Google ScholarPubMed
Talbott, J.A., Stopping the Revolving Door: A Study of Readmission to a State Hospital, Psychiatric Quarterly 48(2): 159 (1974).Google ScholarPubMed
Appleby, L. Desai, P.N., Documenting the Relationship Between Homelessness and Psychiatric Hospitalization, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 36: 732 (July 1985).Google ScholarPubMed
Bassuk, E. Gerson, J., Deinstitutionalization and Mental Health Services, Scientific American 238: 46 (1978); Appleby and Desai, supra note 10.Google ScholarPubMed
Stone, A.A., Overview: The Right to Treatment—Comments on the Law and Its Impact, American Journal of Psychiatry 132(11): 1125 (November 1975); Stromberg, C.D., Stone, A.A., A Model State Law on Civil Commitment of the Mentally Ill, Harvard Journal on Legislation 20(2): 275 (Summer 1983).Google Scholar
Durham, M.L. La Fond, J.Q., The Empirical Consequences and Policy Implications of Broadening the Statutory Criteria for Civil Commitment, Yale Law and Policy Review 3 (2): 395 (Spring 1985); Rubinstein, L.S., The American Psychiatric Association's Proposals on Civil Commitment, Clearinghouse Review 17: 558 (1983);Rubinstein, L.S., APA's Model Law: Hurting the People It Seeks to Help, HOSPITAL and Community Psychiatry 39(9): 968 (September 1985).Google Scholar
Treffert, D.A. Krajeck, R.W., In Search of a Sane Commitment Statute, Psychiatric Annals 6: 283 (1976).Google ScholarPubMed
See Durham and Pierce, supra note 6, at 217.Google Scholar
Pierce, Durham, and Fisher, supra note 6, at 105; Pierce, G.L. Durham, M.L. Fisher, W., The Impact of Public Policy and Publicity on Admission to State Mental Health Hospitals, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (in press).Google Scholar
Pierce, Durham, and Fisher, supra note 6, at 106.Google Scholar
See Durham and La Fond, supra note 13.Google Scholar
See Pierce, Durham, and Fisher, supra note 16.Google Scholar
We limit our discussion to one hospital for two reasons. First, previous analyses (see Pierce, Durham, and Fisher, supra note 6, at 106) show that shifts in hospital utilization patterns following the 1979 ITA were significantly different for the two state hospitals. Consideration of both facilities would be beyond the scope of this paper. It could be misleading to pool outcomes observed at both hospitals. Moreover, information on hospital bed and staffing resources—a critical component of this analysis—were available to the authors for Western State Hospital only.Google Scholar
Gross, A. Clark, V., Survival Distributions: Reliability Applications in the Biomedical Sciences (Wiley, New York 1975).Google Scholar
Hanson, B.L., A Statistical Model for Length of Stay in a Mental Hospital, HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 8(1): 37 (Spring 1973); Reuter, J., VonKorff, M., Chronic Patients in Mental Health Centers, Administration in Mental Health 7(3): 187 (Spring 1980).Google Scholar
We do not examine the potential indirect effect of the 1979 ITA on voluntary admission because these admissions declined to insignificant levels at Western State Hospital in the period following the 1979 legal change (see Pierce, Durham, and Fisher, supra note 16).Google Scholar
The average monthly utilization rate represents the average daily patient census per number of beds.Google Scholar
For an analysis of the likely reason for this increase, see our discussion of the MacFarland murder case in Pierce, Durham, and Fisher, supra note 16.Google Scholar
Extra beds were crammed into the wards, causing overcrowding of patients. In some instances, patients brought to Western State Hospital for emergency treatment and evaluation had to be placed in beds in hallways while awaiting available bedspace (personal communication with Dave Padgett, Division of Mental Health, DSHS, Olympia, Wash., July 23, 1985).Google Scholar
Petersen v. Washington State, 671 P.2d 230 (Wash. 1983).Google Scholar
Quasim, L., Annual Report on the Involuntary Treatment Act (Mental Health Division, Washington State Department of Social and Health Services, September 1984).Google Scholar
In Durham and La Fond (supra note 13) we discuss evidence that gravely disabled patients do remain hospitalized longer than patients committed for dangerousness. While the scope of the present paper does not allow examination of this question, it is clear that further analysis is essential.Google Scholar
See Durham and La Fond, supra note 13.Google Scholar
For a discussion of the APA Model Law see Appelbaum, P., Key Provisions of APA's Model Law, Hospital and Community Psychiatry 36(4): 967 (September 1985).Google ScholarPubMed