No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Why Do You Think They Call It CAPITAL Punishment? Reading the Killing State
Review products
Sarat Austin, When the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 2001. xii + 324 pages.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2024
Extract
Austin Sarat is widely known for work on cause lawyering, divorce lawyers, and white collar crime, and for influential arguments on behalf of integrating humanities topics and methods into empirical studies of law and society. Sarat is not, however, particularly known as a death penalty scholar, an intensive sub-field of socio-legal studies that has been dominated by scholars wholly captured by the compelling nature of the subject. A reader of Sarat's bibliography would have to go back to 1976 when Sarat, as a young political scientist, published research coauthored with an equally junior psychologist, Neil Vidmar, on how public opinion on the death penalty was affected by targeted education on particular aspects of the death penalty including empirical studies doubting its deterrent effects, and on other information designed to raise concerns about the justice of capital punishment (Sarat & Vidmar 1976). In terms of both its methodology and the logic of its inquiry, When the State Kills could hardly differ more from the Sarat and Vidmar study. Between the two, one can mark significant shifts in both the enterprise of socio-legal studies and the place of capital punishment in American political culture.
- Type
- Review Essay
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2002 Law and Society Association.
References
References
Ackerman, Bruce (1998) “Transformations,” Vol. 2, We the People. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baldus, David C., Pulaski, Charles, & Woodworth, George (1983) “Comparative Review of Death Sentences: An Empirical Study of the Georgia Experience,” 74 J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 661.Google Scholar
Banner, Stuart (2002) The Death Penalty: An American History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, Thomas E., Cronin, Tania Z., & Milakovich, Michael E. (1981) U.S. v. Crime in the Streets. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Culver, John H. (1999) “Capital Punishment Politics and Policies in the States, 1977–1997,” 32 Crime, Law & Social Change 287, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M., & Sarat, Austin D. (1980) The Policy Dilemma: Federal Crime Police and the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, 1968-1978. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Translated by Sheridan, Alan. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Ellsworth, Phoebe, & Gross, Samuel (1994) “Hardening of the Attitudes: Americans' Views on the Death Penalty,” 50 J. of Social Issues 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garth, Bryant, & Sterling, Joyce (1998) “From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 409–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Douglas (1975) “Property, Authority, and the Criminal Law,” in Albion's Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in 18th Century England, eds. Douglas Hay, Peter Linebaugh, John G. Rule, E.P. Thompson, and Cal Winslow. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Lesser, Wendy (1993) Pictures at an Execution: An Inquiry into the Subject of Murder. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Liebman, James S. (2000) “The Overproduction of Death,” 100 Col. L. Rev. 2030–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, James, Fagan, Jeffrey, Gelman, Andrew, West, Valerie, Davies, Garth, & Kiss, Alexander (2000) A Broken System: Error Rates in Capital Cases, 1973-1995. Columbia Law School report.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, James, Fagan, Jeffrey, Gelman, Andrew, West, Valerie, Davies, Garth, & Kiss, Alexander (2002) A Broken System, Part II: Why There Is So Much Error in Capital Cases, and What Can Be Done about It. Columbia Law School report.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin (2001) When the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Silbey, Susan (1988) “The Pull of the Policy Audience,” 10 Law & Policy 97–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Vidmar, Neil (1976) “Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Eighth Amendment: Testing the Marshall Hypothesis,” Wisconsin Law Review 171–97.Google Scholar
Scammons, Richard, & Wattenberg, Benjamin J. (1969) The Real Majority. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Scheck, Barry, Neufield, Peter, & Dwyer, Jim (2000) Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make It Right. New York: Signet.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. (1984) The Politics of Law and Order: Street Crime and Public Policy. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. (1991) The Politics of Street Crime: Criminal Process and Cultural Obsession. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan (1997) “Ghosts of the Disciplinary Machine: Lee Harvey Oswald, Life-History, and the Truth of Crime,” 10 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 75–113.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan, & Spaulding, Christina (1999) “Tokens of Our Esteem: Aggravating Factors in the Era of Deregulated Death Penalties,” in Sarat, A., ed., The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics, and Culture. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Von Drehle, David (1995) Among the Lowest of the Dead: The Culture of Death Row. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. & Hawkins, Gordon (1986) Capital Punishment and the American Agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar