Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T12:28:54.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Order without Lawyers: Ellickson on How Neighbors Settle Disputes

Review products

Ellickson Robert C., Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991. 302 pages.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Ellickson, Robert C. (1973) “Alternatives to Zoning: Covenants, Nuisance Rules, and Fines as Land Use Control,” 40 Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. 681.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1982a) “A Reply to Michelman and Frug(Symposium: The Public-Private Distinction), 130 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1602.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1982b) “Cities and Homeowners Associations(Symposium: The Public-Private Distinction), 130 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1519.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1986) “Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution among Neighbors in Shasta County,” 38 Stanford Law Rev. 623.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1988) “The Legal Dimensions of the Privatization Movement(A Federalist Society Symposium: Constitutional Protections of Economic Activity: How They Promote Individual Freedom), 11 George Mason Law Rev. 157 (Winter).Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1989a) “The Case for Coase and against ‘Coaseanism,‘” 99 Yale Law J. 630.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1989b) “Bringing Culture and Human Frailty to Rational Actors: A Critique of Classical Law and Economics(Symposium on Post-Chicago Law and Economics), 65 Chicago-Kent Law Rev. 23.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1990) “Three Systems of Land-Use Control(Symposium: Property: The Founding, the Welfare State, and Beyond, Eighth Annual National Federalist Society Symposium on Law and Public Policy—1989), 13 Harvard J. of Law & Public Policy 67 (Winter).Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C., & Tarlock, A. Dan (1981) Land-Use Controls. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fischl, William A., ed. (1983) “Panel Discussion: Redistribution and Regulation of Housing(Symposium), 32 Emory Law J. 767.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann (1987) Abortion and Divorce in Western Law. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Harvard Law Review (1992) “Riding Herd on Coase's Cattle(Book Review), 105 Harvard Law Rev. 1141.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Stewart (1963) “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Rev. 55.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha A. (1985) “‘Forming under Everything that Grows’: Toward a History of Family Law,” 1985 Wisconsin Law Rev. 819.Google Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H., & Kornhauser, Lewis (1979) “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce,” 88 Yale Law J. 950.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1989) “The Future of Law and Economics: A Comment on Ellickson,” 65 Chicago-Kent Law Rev. 57.Google Scholar
Ross, H. Laurence (1970) Settled Out of Court. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Shearmur, Jeremy F. G., ed. (1988) Symposium: “Privatization: The Assumptions and the Implications,” 71 Marquette Law Rev. 583.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, Barbara (1993) Virtuous Citizens/Disruptive Subjects: Order and Complaint in a New England Court. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Statute Cited

California Food & Agricultural Code, § 17126 (West 1986).Google Scholar