Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:23:09.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Newspaper Ombudsman and Consumer Complaints: An Empirical Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

John A. Hannigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a survey of 282 clients of Sound Off, a Canadian newspaper ombudsman. The data suggest that the newspaper ombudsman works best as a communication “facilitator” but is less effective as a dispute “mediator.” Furthermore, this service was found to be of least benefit to the socially advantaged who appear to use it to pursue more difficult problems. Nevertheless, 73 percent of the respondents indicated that they would use this “action line” service again if the need arose.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , Spring 1977 , pp. 679 - 699
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, in New York on August 30, 1976. I would like to acknowledge the helpful comments of the editor, Richard Abel, and of two reviewers, Michael Mattice and Frank Palen. In addition, I am grateful to Benjamin Singer, who encouraged the undertaking of this project, and to Ruth Hannigan for computational and typing assistance.

References

BELLAY, John T. (1970) A Content Analysis of Three Action Line Columns. M.A. Thesis, Kent State University.Google Scholar
BLISHEN, Bernard (1967) “A Socio-Economic Index for Occupations in Canada,” 4 Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 41.Google Scholar
BLUMSTEIN, Philip W. and WEINSTEIN, Eugene A. (1969) “The Redress of Distributive Injustice,” 74 American Journal of Sociology 408.Google Scholar
Canadian Audit Bureau of Circulation Report (July 19, 1969).Google Scholar
Census of Canada (1971).Google Scholar
Editor and Publisher International Yearbook (1973, 1974, 1975).Google Scholar
EDMONDS, Alan (1971) “How the Action Columnists Get Your Money Back,” 44 Chatelaine 42 (October).Google Scholar
FRIEDMANN, Karl A. (1974) Complaining: Comparative Aspects of Complaint Behaviour and Attitudes toward Complaining in Canada and Britain. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
GAEDEKE, Ralph M. (1972) “Filing and Disposition of Consumer Complaints: Some Empirical Evidence,” 6 Journal of Consumer Affairs 45.Google Scholar
GELLHORN, Walter (1966) Ombudsmen and Others. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GODFREY, Lynda J. and EDGECOMBE, F.H.C. (1972) A Compilation of Consumer Complaints from Selected Canadian Agencies. Unpublished report, Department of Consumer Studies, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario.Google Scholar
GOFFMAN, Erving (1952) “On Cooling the Mark Out,” 15 Psychiatry 451.Google Scholar
GREER, Scott (1962) The Emerging City. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
HANNIGAN, John A. (1972) The Newspaper Ombudsman and the Redress of Consumer Grievances. M.A. Thesis, Department of Sociology, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
HIRSCHMAN, Albert (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
JENNINGS, M. Kent (1968) “Parental Grievances and School Politics,” 32 Public Opinion Quarterly 363.Google Scholar
LOUTTIT, Neil (1972) “Enact Tougher Laws on Warranties, Ontario Told,” Globe and Mail 33 (June 29).Google Scholar
MATTICE, Michael C. (1977) “The Media in the Middle: A Study of Mass Media Complaint Managers,” in Nader, L. (ed.), No Access to Law: How Americans Complain (in press).Google Scholar
NEAL, Arthur and SEEMAN, Melvin (1964) “Organizations and Powerlessness, A Test of the Mediation Hypothesis,” 20 American Sociological Review 216.Google Scholar
NEAL, Arthur and RETTIG, Solomon (1967) “On the Multidimensionality of Alienation,” 32 American Sociological Review 56.Google Scholar
NELSON, David R. and STORCK, Kenneth (1974) “The Newspaper Ombudsman as Viewed by the Rest of the Staff,” 51 Journalism Quarterly 453.Google Scholar
OLSON, David J. (1969) “Citizen Grievance Letters as a Gubernatorial Control Device in Wisconsin,” 31 Journal of Politics 741.Google Scholar
PALEN, Frank (1972) Newspower—A Newpaper as Problem Solver. Unpublished Report, Faculty of Law, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
PEEL, Roy V. (ed.) (1968) “The Ombudsman or Citizen's Defender: A Modern Institution,” 377 Annals, American Academy of Political and Social Science (May).Google Scholar
ROWAT, D.C. (ed.) (1965) The Ombudsman. London: Allen and Unwin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SANFORD, David (1970) “Nothing Works Anymore,” 162 New Republic 21 (February 14).Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin (1976) “Alternatives in Dispute Processing: Litigation in a Small Claims Court,” 10 Law & Society Review 339.Google Scholar
SINGER, Benjamin D. (1973) Feedback and Society. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
TOFFLER, Alvin (1971) Future Shock, New York: Random House.Google Scholar
WHITFORD, William C. and KIMBALL, Spencer L. (1975) “Why Process Consumer Complaints? A Case Study of the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance of Wisconsin,” [1975] Wisconsin Law Review 639.Google Scholar