Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T14:27:00.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lawyers for the Poor in Transition: Involvement, Reform, and the Turnover Problem in the Legal Services Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Jack Katz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lawyers in the federally funded Legal Services program for the poor have distinguished themselves from their predecessors in privately funded Legal Aid societies by discounting long-range career perspectives while expecting work to be involving. In the first part of this paper I analyze how the social status of poor people creates pressures toward routine treatment, and how reform litigation contributes to the Legal Services lawyer's involvement. In the second part I use this career analysis to understand the dilemmas currently confronting Legal Services leadership as it addresses problems of staff turnover. Recalling the social movement origins of the Legal Services program, I treat the turnover problem as a challenge to the institution to define its historical role. The dilemmas confronting institutional leadership in responding to turnover reflect tensions experienced by all reform organizations as the social movements initially supporting them deteriorate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Winter 1978 , pp. 275 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An invitation from Thomas Ehrlich to attend a Legal Services Corporation conference in May, 1977, stimulated my analysis of the turnover problem. The current version benefited from critical reaction to prior drafts by Richard Abel, Howard S. Becker, Egon Bittner, Howard Erlanger, Geoffrey Hazard, Barbara Sard, Allan Schnaiberg, Stephen Wizner, Stanton Wheeler, and an anonymous reviewer for this journal. These readers have no responsibility for any faults that may remain. The Russell Sage Foundation provided financial support for much of the underlying research.

References

ANDERSON, Dillon (1963) “A Law Firm—And What It Expects from You,” in Love, A. and Childers, J.S. (eds.) Leaders in Law. Atlanta: Tupper and Love.Google Scholar
AUERBACH, Jerold S. and Eugene, BARDACH (1973) “‘Born to an Era of Insecurity’: The Career Patterns of Law Review Editors, 1918-1941,” 17 American Journal of Legal History 3.Google Scholar
BAMBERGER, E. Clinton Jr. (1977a) “President's Column,” Legal Services Corporation News 2.Google Scholar
BAMBERGER, E. Clinton Jr. (1977b) “Uses of Investment Income.” Memorandum to Board of Directors, Legal Services Corporation (August 15).Google Scholar
BAMBERGER, E. Clinton Jr. and Barbara, SARD (1977) “Analysis of Turnover Problem and Initial Proposals for Action.” Memorandum to “All Interested Persons,” Legal Services Corporation (March 2).Google Scholar
BECKER, Howard S. (1970) Sociological Work: Method and Substance. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
BECKER, Theodore M. and Peter R., MEYERS (1972) “A Survey of Chicago Law Student Opinions and Career Expectations,” 67 Northwestern University Law Review 628.Google Scholar
BELLOW, Gary (1969) “Reflections on Case-Load Limitations,” 27 NLADA Briefcase 195.Google Scholar
BELLOW, Gary (1977) “The Legal Aid Puzzle: Turning Solutions into Problems.” 4 Working Papers 52 (Spring).Google Scholar
NLADA BRIEFCASE (1968) “Reginald Heber Smith Awards,” 27 NLADA Briefcase 78.Google Scholar
BLUMENTHAL, Richard and Mark I., SOLER (1971) “The Legal Services Corporation: Curtailing Political Interference,” 81 Yale Law Journal 231.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome E. (1962) Lawyers on Their Own: A Study of Individual Practitioners in Chicago. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome E. (1970) “Store Front Lawyers in San Francisco,” 7 Trans-action 64.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome E., Jan, HOWARD and Sheldon L., MESSINGER (1966) “Civil Justice and the Poor,” 1 Law & Society Review 9.Google Scholar
COLES, Robert (1964) “Social Struggle and Weariness,” 27 Psychiatry 305.Google Scholar
DAVIES, William (1971) “Getting Ghetto Justice,” Chicago Tribune Magazine 24 (October 31).Google Scholar
ERLANGER, Howard S. (1977) “Social Reform Organizations and Subsequent Careers of Participants,” 42 American Sociological Review 233.Google Scholar
ERLANGER, Howard S. (1978) “Lawyers and Neighborhood Legal Services: Social Background and the Impetus for Reform,” 12 Law & Society Review 253.Google Scholar
FISHER, Kenneth P. and Charles C., IVIE (1971) Franchising Justice. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
GETZELS, Mortimer (1969) “Legal Aid Cases Should Not Be Limited,” 27 NLADA Briefcase 302.Google Scholar
GOLDSTEIN, Tom (1977) “Legal-Assistance Agency Picketed by Its Staff as It Marks 10th Year,” New York Times (October 14) p. B2.Google Scholar
GRANT, Sally Deane (1967) “Resort to the Legal Process in Collecting Debts from High Risk Credit Buyers in Los Angeles,” 14 UCLA Law Review 327.Google Scholar
GRISWOLD, Erwin N. (1963) “Law School—And Your Study of Law,” in Love, A. and Childers, J.S. (eds.) Leaders in Law. Atlanta: Tupper and Love.Google Scholar
GUSFIELD, Joseph R. (1957) “The Problem of Generations in an Organizational Structure,” 35 Social Forces 323.Google Scholar
HAMLIN, Barney (1977) “1978 Funding.” Memorandum to “Regional Directors,” Legal Services Corporation (August 25).Google Scholar
HELFGOT, Joseph (1974) “Professional Reform Organizations and the Symbolic Representation of the Poor,” 39 American Sociological Review 475.Google Scholar
HORSKY, Charles (1952) The Washington Lawyer. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
JOHNSTONE, Quintin and Dan, HOPSON Jr. (1967) Lawyers and Their Work. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
JONES, Charles (1977) “Budget Adjustments.” Memorandum to “All Regional Staffs,” Legal Services Corporation (July 29).Google Scholar
KATZ, Jack (1976) Routine and Reform. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
KATZ, Jack (1977) “Bias in the Prosecution of White- and Blue-Collar Crime.” New Haven: Yale Law School.Google Scholar
LEGAL AID SOCIETY (1917) Annual Report. Chicago: Legal Aid Society.Google Scholar
LENIN, V.I. (1970) “What is to be done?,” in Gusfield, Joseph R. (ed.) Protest, Reform and Revolt. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
MATTHEWS, Arthur A. and Jonathan A., WEISS (1967) “What Can Be Done: A Neighborhood Lawyer's Credo.” 47 Boston University Law Review 231.Google Scholar
McKELVEY, Bill and Uma, SAKARAN (1977) “Toward a Career-Based Theory of Job Involvement,” 22 Administrative Science Quarterly 281.Google Scholar
MESSINGER, Sheldon L. (1955) “Organizational Transformation: A Case Study of a Declining Social Movement,” 20 American Sociological Review 3.Google Scholar
NIZER, Louis (1961) My Life in Court. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
PLATT, Anthony and Randi, POLLOCK (1974) “Channeling Lawyers,” 9 Tssues in Criminology 1.Google Scholar
SIMON, Rita J., Frank, KOZIEL and Nancy, JOSLYN (1973) “Have There Been Significant Changes in the Career Aspirations and Occupational Choices in Law School Graduates in the 1960s?,” 8 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
SMIGEL, Erwin O. (1969) The Wall Street Lawyer. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
SPARER, Edward V. (1970) “The Right to Welfare,” in Dorsen, Norman (ed.) The Rights of Americans. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
UNITED CHARITIES OF CHICAGO (1973) Annual Report of the Legal Aid Bureau. Chicago: United Charities of Chicago.Google Scholar
WEXLER, Stephen (1970) “Practicing Law for Poor People,” 79 Yale Law Journal 1049.Google Scholar
ZALD, Mayer N. and Roberta, ASH (1966) “Social Movement Organizations: Growth, Decay and Change,” 44 Social Forces 327.Google Scholar
ZALD, Mayer N. and McCARTHY, John D. (1975) “Organizational Intellectuals and the Criticism of Society,” 49 Social Service Review 344.Google Scholar