Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:24:00.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law, Time, and Community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

David M. Engel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research concerning law and social change has almost always treated time as a universal constant and a baseline against which variations in behavior can be measured. Yet a significant literature exists demonstrating that researchers can also regard time as a socially constructed phenomenon requiring analytic interpretation in its own right. This article explores two aspects of the human experience of time that were especially important for the residents of a rural American community: the sense of time's iterative character and its linear or irreversible quality. These two ways of experiencing and conceptualizing time played a significant part in efforts by residents of Sander County, Illinois, to define their community and interpret the social, cultural, and economic transformations it was undergoing. They were also important in the residents' efforts to frame and define conflict within the community and to determine when law should or should not be invoked. The article examines some ways in which the analysis of varying conceptions of time within a community can enhance understanding of expectations, perceptions, and values concerning law in a changing society.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , 1987 , pp. 605 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article evolved during the early stages of a collaborative project with Carol J. Greenhouse and Barbara Yngvesson, and I am grateful for their advice and encouragement. For their helpful and insightful comments on earlier drafts of this article, I would also like to thank James Atleson, Fred Konfesky, Sally Merry, Frank Munger, John Henry Schlegel, and Robert Steinfeld. I am grateful to Linda Kosinski for her usual generosity and skill in typing the various drafts of this manuscript and to Carol Fitzsimmons for rechecking the interview transcriptions. Research for this article was sponsored by the National Science Foundation Grant No. SES-8511105.

References

BERGSON, Henri ([1889] 1960) Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness, trans. F. L. Pogson. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
BOURDIEU, P. (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DERRIDA, Jacques (1973) Speech and Phenomena, and Other Essays on Husserl's Theory of Signs, trans. Allison, David B.. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
DURKHEIM, Emile (1915) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, trans. Swain, Joseph Ward. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M. (1984) “The Oven Bird's Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal Injuries in an American Community,” 18 Law & Society Review 551.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M. (1983) “Cases, Conflict, and Accommodation: Patterns of Legal Interaction in an American Community,” 1983 ABF Research Journal 803.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M. (1980) “Legal Pluralism in an American Community: Perspectives on a Civil Trial Court,” 1980 ABF Research Journal 425.Google Scholar
ENGEL, David M., and Barbara, YNGVESSON (1984) “Mapping Difficult Terrain: ‘Legal Culture,’ ‘Legal Consciousness,’ and Other Hazards for the Intrepid Explorer,” 6 Law & Policy 299.Google Scholar
EVANS-PRITCHARD, E. E. (1940) The Nuer. Clarendon: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FILIPCOVÁ, Blanka, and Jindřich, FILIPEC (1986) “Society and Concepts of Time,” 38 International Social Science Journal 19.Google Scholar
GEERTZ, Clifford (1973) “Person, Time, and Conduct in Bali,” in The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
GIDDENS, Anthony (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GREENHOUSE, Carol J. (1986) Praying for Justice: Faith, Order, and Community in an American Town. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
HOWE, Leopold E. A. (1981) “The Social Determination of Knowledge: Maurice Bloch and Balinese Time,” 16 (n.s.) Man 220.Google Scholar
JAMES, William (1893) Principles of Psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Samuel ([1759] 1958) Rasselas, Poems, and Selected Prose, ed. Bertrand H. Bronson. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
LEACH, Edmund (1961) “Two Essays Concerning the Symbolic Representation of Time,” in Rethinking Anthropology. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude (1966) The Savage Mind, trans. Weidenfeld, George. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk (1977) “Individual Interests and Organizational Structures: Dispute Settlements as Events of Articulation,” in Hamnett, Ian, ed., Social Anthropology and Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, E. P. (1967) “Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism,” 38 Past and Present 56.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara (1986) “Private Nuisance, Public Crime: The Clerk, the Court and the Construction of Order in a New England Town.” Presented at Cornell University Law School (November).Google Scholar