Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T00:23:01.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Karl Renner and (Intellectual) Property—How Cognitive Theory Can Enrich a Sociolegal Analysis of Contemporary Copyright

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Stefan Larsson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article deals with copyright regulation meeting the quite rapid societal changes associated with digitization, and it does so by reinterpreting Karl Renner's classical texts in the light of contemporary cognitive theory of conceptual metaphors and embodiment. From a cognitive theory perspective, I focus on the notion that the legal norms only appear to be unchanged—the Renner distinction between form and function. This includes social norms, technological development, and changes in social structures in general, which create a social and cognitive reinterpretation of law. This article, therefore, analyzes the contemporary push for copyright as property, which I relate to historical claims for copyright as property as well as de facto legal revisions in intellectual property faced with the challenges of digitization. Of particular relevance here is what Renner described in terms of property as an “institution of domination and control,” and thus the increased measures for control that are added to a digital context in the name of copyright.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 3 - 33
Copyright
© 2014 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berne Convention for the Protection for Literary and Artistic Works, last amended in Paris on September 28, 1979.Google Scholar
TRIPS Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights signed in Marrakech, Morocco on 15 April 1994.Google Scholar
The Swedish Penal Code: Brottsbalk (1962:700), translation in Ds 1999:36.Google Scholar
INFOSOC directive Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.Google Scholar
Wired (2011) “ISPs to Disrupt Internet Access of Copyright Scofflaws,” by David Kravets.Google Scholar
Rome Convention Rome Convention: The International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organizations.Google Scholar
Alter, Alexandra (2012) “Your E-Book Is Reading You,” The Wall Street J.Google Scholar
Altschuller, Shoshana, & Benbunan-Fich, Raquel (2009) “Is Music Downloading the New Prohibition? What Students Reveal through an Ethical Dilemma,” 11 Ethics and Information Technology 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsterdam, Anthony G., & Bruner, Jerome S. (2000) Minding the Law. How Courts Rely on Storytelling, and How Their Stories Change the Ways We Understand the Law – and Ourselves. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Andersson Schwarz, Jonas, & Larsson, Stefan (2013) “On the Justifications of Piracy: Differences in Conceptualization and Argumentation between Active Uploaders and Other File-Sharers,” in Arvanitakis, J., & Fredriksson, M., eds., Piracy: Leakages from Modernity. Los Angeles, CA: Litwin Books.Google Scholar
Andersson Schwarz, Jonas, & Palmås, Karl (2013) “Introducing the Panspectric Challenge: A Reconfiguration of Regulatory Values in a Multiplatform Media Landscape,” 6 Central European J. of Communication 219–33.Google Scholar
Aubert, Vilhelm (1969) Sociology of Law. edited by Vilhelm Aubert. Penguin books Ltd.Google Scholar
Aubert, Vilhelm (1972) Rättssociologi. Stockholm: Aldus/Bonnier.Google Scholar
Aubert, Vilhelm (1989) Continuity and Development in Law and Society. Oslo: Norwegian Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Carl A. (1980) “The Relation of Legal Systems to Social Change,” 6 Wisconsin Law Rev. 1227–340.Google Scholar
Berger, Linda L. (2004) “What Is the Sound of A Corporation Speaking? How the Cognitive Theory of Metaphor Can Help Lawyers Shape the Law,” 2 J. of the Association of Legal Writing Directors 169–208.Google Scholar
Berger, Linda L. (2007) “Of Metaphor, Metonymy, and Corporate Money: Rhetorical Choices in Supreme Court Decisions on Campaign Finance Regulation,” 58 Mercer Law Rev. 949–90.Google Scholar
Berger, Linda L. (2009) “How Embedded Knowledge Structures Affect Judicial Decision Making: A Rhetorical Analysis of Metaphor, Narrative, and Imagination in Child Custody Disputes,” 18 Southern California Interdisciplinary Law J. 259–308.Google Scholar
Berger, Linda L. (2011) “The Lady, or the Tiger? A Field Guide to Metaphor and Narrative,” 50 Washburn Law J. 275–318.Google Scholar
Bjerre, Carl S. (2005) “Mental Capacity as Metaphor,” 18 International J. for the Semiotics of Law 101–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjerre, Carl S. (1999) “Secured Transactions Inside Out: Negative Pledge Covenants Property and Perfection,” 84 Cornell Law Rev. 305–93.Google Scholar
Black, Max (1962) Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. New York: Cornell Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Max (1979) “More About Metaphor,” in Ortony, A., ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 19–43.Google Scholar
Blavin, Jonathan H., and Cohen, I. Glenn (2002) “Gore, Gibson, and Goldsmith: The Evolution of Internet Metaphors in Law and Commentary,” 16 Harvard J. Law & Technology 265–85.Google Scholar
Bottomore, Tom, & Goode, Patrick (1978) Austro-Marxism. Texts translated and edited by Bottomore and Goode, with an introduction by Bottomore. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Carver, Terrell, & Pikalo, Jernej, eds. (2008) Political Language and Metaphor, Interpreting and Changing the World. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, Kimberly, & Lauer, Thomas W. (2004) “Media Transitions. The Cases of Digital Imagery and E-Mail,” 17 Information Technology & People 252–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger (1992) The Sociology of Law: An Introduction, second ed. London, Dublin, Edinburgh: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Drahos, Peter, & Braithwaite, John (2002) Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy. UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Drulák, Petr (2008) “Identifying and Assessing Metaphors: Discourse on EU Reform,” in Carver, T., & Pikalo, J., eds., Political Language and Metaphor, Interpreting and Changing the World. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. 105–18.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth (1980) The Printing Press As An Agent of Change. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Yuval, & Nadler, Janice (2006) “The Law and Norms of File Sharing,” 43 San Diego Law Rev. 577–618.Google Scholar
Fleischer, R. (2012) Musikens Politiska Ekonomi. Lagstiftningen, ljudmedierna och försvaret av den levande musiken, 1925–2000. Ink Bokförlag.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1991) Discipline and Punish – The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin books.Google Scholar
Geiger, Christophe (2012) “The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement and Criminal Enforcement of Intellectual Property: What Consequences for the European Union?” Rosen, J., ed., IP Rights at the Crossroads of Trade. Cheltenham (UK)/Northampton, MA (USA): Edward Elgar. 167–81.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. (2005) Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, Tarleton (2007) Wired Shut: Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam (2008) “How Metaphors Create Categories—Quickly,” in Gibbs, Raymond W., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, Oliver R., & Decker, Gregory J. (2008) Why Do Good People Steal Intellectual Property? Law, Mind and Brain, Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2008-2.Google Scholar
Grace, Clive, & Wilkinson, Philip (1978) Sociological Inquiry and Legal Phenomena. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hemmungs Wirtén, Eva (2004) No Trespassing. Authorship, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Boundaries of Globalization. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmungs Wirtén, Eva (2011) Cosmopolitan Copyright: Law and Language in the Translation Zone. Uppsala: Meddelanden från Institutionen för ABM vid Uppsala universitet Nr 4.Google Scholar
Herman, Bill D. (2008) “Breaking and Entering My Own Computer: The Contest of Copyright Metaphors,” 13 Communication Law and Policy 231–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hohfeld, Wesley Newcomb (1913) “Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions As Applied in Judicial Reasoning,” 23 Yale Law J. 16–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, D. (2003) “Cyberspace as Place and the Tragedy of the Digital Anticommons," 91 California Law Rev. 439–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsson, Peter (2012) Öppenhetsindustrin. Örebro Studies in Media and Communication 13, Södertörn Doctoral Dissertations 65.Google Scholar
Jensen, Christopher (2003) “The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same: Copyright, Digital Technology, and Social Norms,” 56 Stanford Law Rev. 531–70.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark L. (1987) The Body of the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark L. (2007) “Mind, Metaphor, Law,” 58 Mercer Law Rev. 845–68.Google Scholar
Joo, Thomas W. (2001) “Contract, Property and the Role of Metaphor in Corporations Law,” UC Davis Law Rev. 1–59.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, Otto (1949/2010) “Introduction,” in Renner, K., ed., The Institutions of Private Law and Their Social Functions. New Brunswick, USA, and London, UK: Transaction Publishers. 8–16.Google Scholar
Kann, R.A. (1951) “Karl Renner (December 14, 1870-December 31, 1950),” 23 The J. of Modern History 243–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsey, Richard (1983) “Karl Renner on Socialist Legality,” in Sugarman, D., ed., Legality, Ideology, and the State. London: Academic Press. 27–35.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltan (2008) “Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Some Criticisms and Alternative Proposals,” 6 Annual Rev. of Cognitive Linguistics 168–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kullenberg, Christopher (2010) Det Nätpolitiska Manifestet. Ink Bokförlag.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George (1986) “A Figure of Thought,” 1 Metaphor and Symbol 215–25.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George (1987) Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about Mind. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George (1993) “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor,” in Ortony, A., ed., Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 202–51.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George (2005) Don't Think of An Elephant: Know Your Values and Reframe the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark (1980) Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, & Johnson, Mark (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Larsson, Stefan (2011a) “Den Stigberoende Upphovsrätten. Om Konsekvenserna Av Rättslig Inlåsning I En Digital Tid,” 4 Retfærd, Nordic J. of Law and Justice 122–46.Google Scholar
Larsson, Stefan (2011b) Metaphors and Norms. Understanding Copyright Law in a Digital Society, PhD Thesis. Lund Studies in Sociology of Law, Lund University.Google Scholar
Larsson, Stefan (2011c) “The Path Dependence of European Copyright,” 8 SCRIPT:Ed 1 A J. of Law, Technology & Society 8–31.Google Scholar
Larsson, Stefan (2012a) “Conceptions in the Code: What ‘the Copyright Wars’ Tells about Creativity, Social Change and Normative Conflicts in the Digital Society,” 4 Societal Studies 1009–30.Google Scholar
Larsson, Stefan (2012b) “Metaforerna och Rätten,” 2 Retfærd. Nordic J. of Law and Justice 69–93.Google Scholar
Larsson, Stefan (2013a) “Conceptions, Categories, and Embodiment – Why Metaphors Are of Fundamental Importance for Understanding Norms,” in Baier, M., ed., Social and Legal Norms. Towards A Socio-Legal Understanding of Normativity. UK: Ashgate Publishing. 121–39.Google Scholar
Larsson, Stefan (2013b) “Metaphors, Law and Digital Phenomena: The Swedish Pirate Bay Court Case,” 21 International J. of Law and Information Technology 329–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Stefan (2013c) “Rätten Som Rum, Kropp Och Kontext: Det Konceptuella Förtingligandets Rättsvetenskapliga Relevans,” 126 Tidsskrift for Rettsvitenskap 343–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Stefan (2013d) “Copy Me Happy—The Metaphoric Expansion of Copyright in a Digital Society,” 26 International J. for the Semiotics of Law 615–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Stefan, & Hydén, Håkan (2010) “Law, Deviation and Paradigmatic Change: Copyright and Its Metaphors,” in Vargas Martin, M., Garcia-Ruiz, M. A., & Edwards, A., eds., Technology for Facilitating Humanity and Combating Social Deviations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global. 188–208.Google Scholar
Larsson, Stefan, & Svensson, Måns (2010) “Compliance or Obscurity? Online Anonymity as a Consequence of Fighting Unauthorised File-sharing,” 2 Policy & Internet 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Stefan, Svensson, Måns, & de Kaminski, Marcin (2012a) “Online Piracy, Anonymity and Social Change—Innovation through Deviance,” 19 Convergence: The International J. of Research into New Media Technologies 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, Stefan, Svensson, Måns, de Kaminski, Marcin, Rönkkö, Kari, & Johanna, Alkan Olsson (2012b) “Law, Norms, Piracy and Online Anonymity – Practices of De-identification in the Global File Sharing Community,” 6 J. of Research in Interactive Marketing 260–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laski, Harold J. (1950) “Review of Karl Renner's The Institutions of Private Law,” 13 The Modern Law Rev. 389–92.Google Scholar
Leader, Sheldon (1999) “Participation and Property Rights,” 21 J. of Business Ethics 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemley, Mark A. (2005) “Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding,” 83 Texas Law Rev. 1031.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence (1999) Code: and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence (2002) The Future of Ideas: the Fate of the Commons in A Connected World. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence (2004) Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin books.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence (2006) Code Version 2.0. New York: Basic books cop.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence (2008) Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy. London: Bloomsbury Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlan, Patricia (2006) “Pirates, Parasites, Reapers, Sowers, Fruits, Foxes…The Metaphors of Intellectual Property,” 28 Sydney Law Rev. 211–26.Google Scholar
Loughlan, Patricia (2007) “ ‘You Wouldn't Steal a Car’: Intellectual Property and the Language of Theft,” 29 European Intellectual Property Rev. 401–5.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1972) Rechtssoziologie. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Roderick A. (1977) “Social and Economic Control through Law—A Review of Karl Renner's the Institutions of Private Law and Their Social Functions,” 25 Chitty's Law J. 7–18.Google Scholar
McLeod, Kembrew (2007) Freedom of Expression. Resistance and Repression in the Age of Intellectual Property. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McManus, Jim J. (1978) “The Emergence and Non-Emergence of Legislation,” 5 British J. of Law and Society 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellinkoff, David (1963) The Language of the Law. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Mendis, Dinusha (2013) “Digital Economy Act 2010: Fighting a Losing Battle? Why the ‘Three Strikes’ Law Is Not the Answer to Copyright Law's Latest Challenge,” 27 International Rev. of Law, Computers and Technology 60–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moohr, Geraldine S. (2003) “The Crime of Copyright Infringement: An Inquiry Based on Morality, Harm, and Criminal Theory,” 83 Boston Univ. Law Rev. 731–783.Google Scholar
Morra, Lucia (2010) “New Models for Language Understanding and the Cognitive Approach to Legal Metaphors,” 23 International J. for the Semiotics of Law 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obasogie, Osagie K. (2010) “Do Blind People See Race? Social, Legal, and Theoretical Considerations,” 44 Law & Society Rev. 585–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmås, Karl (2009) En Liten Bok Om Slem. Stockholm: Federa.Google Scholar
Patry, William (2009) Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Patry, William (2012) How to Fix Copyright. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peczenik, Alexander (1995) Vad Är Rätt? Om Demokrati, Rättssäkerhet, Etik Och Juridisk Argumentation. Stockholm: Fritzes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Michael (1979) “The Conduit Metaphor,” in Ortony, A., ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 284–310.Google Scholar
Renner, Karl (1918) Marxismus, Krieg Und Internationale, 2nd ed. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Renner, Karl (2010/1949) The Institutions of Private Law and Their Social Functions. New Brunswick, USA, and London, UK: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Robson, Peter (1977) “Renner Revisited,” Perspectives in Jurisprudence. Glasgow University, Glasgow, Scotland, 221–35.Google Scholar
Rose, Mark (1993) Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge and London: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schön, Donald A. (1979) “Generative Metaphor,” in Ortony, A., ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 254–83.Google Scholar
Schottenius Cullhed, Sigrid (2012) Proba the Prophet: Studies in the Christian Virgilian Cento of Faltonia Betitia Proba. Gothenburg: Gothenburg Univ.Google Scholar
Schultz, Mark F. (2007) “Copynorms: Copyright and Social Norms,” in Yu, P. K., ed., Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Shannon, Pat (1977) “Book Review: The Institutions of Private Law and Their Social Functions Karl Renner,” 13 J. of Sociology 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strahilevitz, Lior J. (2003a) “Charismatic Code, Social Norms, and the Emergence of Cooperation on the File-Swapping Networks,” 89 Virginia Law Rev. 505–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strahilevitz, Lior J. (2003b) “Social Norms from Close-knit Groups to Loose-knit Groups,” 70 The Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. 359–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, Måns, & Larsson, Stefan (2009) Social norms and intellectual property: Online norms and the European legal development . Research Report in Sociology of Law, 2009: 1. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Svensson, Måns (2013) “Norms in Law and Society,” in Baier, M., ed., Social and Legal Norms. Towards A Socio-Legal Understanding of Normativity. UK: Ashgate Publishing. 39–52.Google Scholar
Svensson, Måns, & Larsson, Stefan (2012) “Intellectual Property Law Compliance in Europe: Illegal File Sharing and the Role of Social Norms,” 14 New Media & Society 1147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tehranian, John (2007) “Infringement Nation: Copyright Reform and the Law/Norm Gap,” 3 Utah Law Rev. 537–51.Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M, & Solan, Lawrence M. (2004) “Cops and Robbers: Selective Literalism in American Criminal Law,” 38 Law & Society Rev. 229–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, A. Javier (2008) The Sociology of Law. Classical and Contemporary Perspectives. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Treviño, A. Javier (2010) “Introduction to the Transaction Edition,” in Renner, K., ed., The Institutions of Private Law and Their Social Functions. New Brunswick, USA, and London, UK: Transaction Publishers. ix–xxvi.Google Scholar
Tsai, Robert L. (2004) “Fire, Metaphor, and Constitutional Myth-Making,” 93 Georgetown Law J. 181–239.Google Scholar
Vaidhyanathan, Siva (2001) Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York: New York Univ. Press, cop.Google Scholar
Volgsten, Ulrik (2012) Musiken, medierna och lagarna: Musikverkets historia och etablerande av en idealistisk upphovsrätt. Gidlunds förlag.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, Lisa (2010) “Making the Case for Socio-Legal Research in Land Law: Renner and the Law of Mortgage,” 37 J. of Law and Society 545–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingrove, Twila, Korpas, Angela L., & Weisz, Victoria (2010) “Why Were Millions of People Not Obeying the Law? Motivational Influences on Non-Compliance with the Law in the Case of Music Piracy,” 17 Psychology, Crime & Law 261–76.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. (2001) A Clearing in the Forest: Law, Life, and Mind. Chicago and London: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. (2007) “Re-embodying Law,” 58 Mercer Law Rev. 869–97.Google Scholar
Winter, Steven L. (2008) “What Is the ‘Color’ of Law? Gibbs, Raymond W., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. 363–79.Google Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha (1984) “The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the ‘Author’,” 17 Eighteenth-Century Studies 425–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodmansee, Martha (1994) “On the Author Effect: Recovering Collectivity,” in Woodmansee, M., & Jaszi, P., eds., The Construction of Authorship: Textual Appropriation in Law and Literature. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press. 15–28.Google Scholar
Yar, Majid (2008) “The Rhetorics and Myths of Anti-Piracy Campaigns: Criminalization, Moral Pedagogy and Capitalist Property Relations in the Classroom,” 10 New Media & Society 605–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar