Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T11:16:22.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A “good fit”: Client sorting among nonprofit, private, and pro bono immigration attorneys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Lilly Yu Open the ORCID record for Lilly Yu [Opens in a new window]
Lilly Yu*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
*
Lilly Yu, Department of Sociology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. Email: lillyyu@fas.harvard.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Existing scholarship finds that having an attorney in immigration legal proceedings increases the chances of a favorable outcome. This work, however, often acknowledges that the representation effect is underexplained: selection may explain outcomes, and variation among attorneys is difficult to assess. Through 103 interviews with attorneys who practice immigration law in three organizational environments (nonprofit legal services, private firms, and corporate law firm pro bono programs) in two East Coast areas, this paper argues that attorneys' sorting of clients between different types of legal organizations helps explain the representation effect. Attorneys define what type of case is a “good fit” for their representation, selecting cases they think they can help increase the probability of a favorable outcome. However, what they define as a “good fit” varies by attorneys' practice environments, and centers not only on the facts or characteristics of a client and their case, but also attorneys' organizational constraints. By documenting the central role of practice environment variation and its organizational constraints on attorneys' case selection, this paper helps explain the representation effect and its implications for increasing vulnerable immigrants' access to legal representation in the United States.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 141 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © 2023 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

How to cite this article: Yu, Lilly. 2023. “A “Good Fit”: Client Sorting among Nonprofit, Private, and Pro Bono Immigration Attorneys.” Law & Society Review 57(2): 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12654

References

REFERENCES

Berberich, Karen, Chen, Annie, Lazar, Corey, and Tucker, Emily. 2018. Advancing Universal Representation: A Toolkit. Module 1: The Case for Universal Representation. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice https://www.vera.org/advancing-universal-representation-toolkit/the-case-for-universal-representation-1.Google Scholar
Boutcher, Steven A. 2011. “Rethinking Culture: Organized Pro Bono and the External Sources of Law Firm Culture.” University of St. Thomas Law Journal 8(2): 108–28.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Michael T., and Currie, Janet. 2022. “The Effects of Legal Representation on Tenant Outcomes in Housing Court: Evidence from new York City's Universal Access Program.” Working Paper. Working Paper Series. National Bureau of Economic Research https://doi.org/10.3386/w29836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chand, Daniel E., Apolonia Calderon, M., Hawes, Daniel P., and O'Keeffe, Lauren. 2021. “Serving Immigrant Communities: Effectiveness of Nonprofit Legal Aid Organizations in an Age of Heightened Enforcement.” Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 32(3): 621–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00205-w.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chand, Daniel E., Schreckhise, William D., and Bowers, Marianne L.. 2017. “The Dynamics of State and Local Contexts and Immigration Asylum Hearing Decisions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27(1): 182–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clair, Matthew. 2020. Privilege and Punishment: How Race and Class Matter in Criminal Court. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Degnan, Ellen, Thomas Ferriss, D., Greiner, James, and Sommers, Roseanna. 2018. Trapped in Marriage. SSRN Scholarly Paper: Rochester, NY. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3277900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deterding, Nicole M., and Waters, Mary C.. 2021. “Flexible Coding of In-Depth Interviews: A Twenty-First-Century Approach.” Sociological Methods & Research 50(2): 708–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Ingrid V., and Shafer, Steven. 2015. “A National Study of Access to Counsel in Immigration Court.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 164: 1–92.Google Scholar
Farmer, Liz. 2017. Amid Immigration Crackdown, Local Governments Consider Legal Aid Governing, May 9, 2017. https://www.governing.com/topics/finance/gov-cities-counties-funding-legal-services-immigrants.htmlGoogle Scholar
Galli, Chiara. 2019. “Humanitarian Capital: How Lawyers Help Immigrants Use Suffering to Claim Membership in the Nation-State.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 1–18: 2181–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1582325.Google Scholar
Keith, Linda Camp, Holmes, Jennifer S., and Miller, Banks P.. 2013. “Explaining the Divergence in Asylum Grant Rates among Immigration Judges: An Attitudinal and Cognitive Approach.” Law & Policy 35(4): 261–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakhani, Sarah Morando. 2013. “Producing Immigrant Victims' ‘Right’ to Legal Status and the Management of Legal Uncertainty.” Law & Social Inquiry 38(2): 442–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakhani, Sarah Morando. 2014. “From Problems of Living to Problems of Law: The Legal Translation and Documentation of Immigrant Abuse and Helpfulness.” Law & Social Inquiry 39(3): 643–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsi.12082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakhani, Sarah Morando. 2019. “Universalizing the U Visa: Challenges of Immigration Case Selection in Legal Nonprofits.” California Law Review 107: 1661–712.Google Scholar
Manuel, Kate M. 2016. Aliens' Right to Counsel in Removal Proceedings: In Brief. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service https://sgp.fas.org/crs/homesec/R43613.pdf.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria, and Hale, Daniel Crocker. 2014. “Cause Lawyering.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10(1): 301–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102612-133932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellinger, Hillary. 2021. “Quality Over Quantity: Legal Representation at the Asylum Office.” Law & Policy 43(4): 368–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menjívar, Cecilia. 2006. “Liminal Legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan Immigrants' Lives in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 111(4): 999–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/499509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Banks, Keith, Linda Camp, and Holmes, Jennifer S.. 2015. “Leveling the Odds: The Effect of Quality Legal Representation in Cases of Asymmetrical Capability.” Law & Society Review 49(1): 209–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Immigration Law Center. 2016. “Blazing a Trail: The Fight for Right to Counsel in Detention and beyond.” National Immigration Law Center https://www.nilc.org/news/special-reports/blazing-a-trail-right-to-counsel/.Google Scholar
Ryo, Emily. 2016. “Detained: A Study of Immigration Bond Hearings.” Law & Society Review 50(1): 117–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryo, Emily. 2018. “Representing Immigrants: The Role of Lawyers in Immigration Bond Hearings.” Law & Society Review 52(2): 503–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryo, Emily, and Peacock, Ian. 2019. “Beyond the Walls: The Importance of Community Contexts in Immigration Detention.” American Behavioral Scientist 63(9): 1250–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219835269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryo, Emily, and Peacock, Ian. 2021. “Represented but Unequal: The Contingent Effect of Legal Representation in Removal Proceedings.” Law & Society Review 55(4): 634–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca L. 2008. “Access to Civil Justice and Race, Class, and Gender Inequality.” Annual Review of Sociology 34(1): 339–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca L. 2015. “Elements of Professional Expertise: Understanding Relational and Substantive Expertise through Lawyers' Impact.” American Sociological Review 80(5): 909–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415601157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca L. 2019. “Access to What?” Daedalus 148(1): 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenholtz, Andrew I., Ramji-Nogales, Jaya, and Schrag, Philip G.. 2007. “Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication.” Stanford Law Review 60: 295–412.Google Scholar
Schoenholtz, Andrew I., Schrag, Philip G., and Ramji-Nogales, Jaya. 2014. Lives in the Balance: Asylum Adjudication by the Department of Homeland Security. New York: NYU Press http://muse.jhu.edu/book/27909.Google Scholar
Seron, Carroll, Frankel, Martin, Van Ryzin, Gregg, and Kovath, Jean. 2001. “The Impact of Legal Counsel on Outcomes for Poor Tenants in new York City's Housing Court: Results of a Randomized Experiment.” Law & Society Review 35(2): 419–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3185408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stumpf, Juliet. 2006. “The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power.” American University Law Review 56(2): 367–419.Google Scholar
Tareen, Sophia, Taxin, Amy, and Rojas, Leslie Berestein. 2016. The Latest: Los Angeles Plans $10M for Immigrant Legal Aid. New York City, New York: Associated Press December 19, 2016. https://www.scpr.org/news/2016/12/19/67350/la-other-municipalities-plan-immigrant-legal-aid-a/.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, Nicole Gonzalez. 2017. Crook County: Racism and Injustice in America's Largest Criminal Court. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Vera Institute for Justice. 2021. A Federal Defender Service for Immigrants. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice https://www.vera.org/publications/a-federal-defender-service-for-immigrants.Google Scholar
Vera Institute of Justice. 2020. Rising to the Moment: Advancing the National Movement for Universal Representation. New York, NY: Vera Institute of Justice https://www.vera.org/publications/rising-to-the-moment-for-universal-representation.Google Scholar
Villalon, Roberta. 2010. Violence against Latina Immigrants: Citizenship, Inequality, and Community. New York: NYU Press http://muse.jhu.edu/book/11134.Google Scholar