Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T03:14:33.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Marx to Market: Lawyers, European Law, and the Contentious Transformation of the Port of Genoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Tommaso Pavone
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What happens when international courts are asked to tackle local political controversies and their judgments subsequently spark contentious resistance? In the European Union (EU), scholars have posited that the politicization of the often-liberalizing rulings of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) provokes Euroscepticism and noncompliance. In contrast, I argue that contentious politics may also produce permissive conditions for activist “Eurolawyers” to promote awareness of EU law and mobilize support for liberalization. To unpack this claim, I conduct an intensive case study of perhaps the most explosive controversy in Italy to generate litigation before the ECJ: The 1991 “Port of Genoa” case, where the public monopoly rights of a centuries-old dockworkers' union were challenged. Leveraging interviews, court and newspaper records, public opinion data, and litigation statistics, I trace how—despite dockworkers' vigorous resistance—a pair of entrepreneurial lawyers liberalized Italy's largest port by combining strategic litigation with a public relations campaign to mobilize a compliance constituency. I conclude with insights the case study offers into the contemporary politics of transnational governance.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 53 , Issue 3 , September 2019 , pp. 851 - 888
Copyright
© 2018 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

He would also like to thank his interviewees for their insights and openness, and particularly Giuseppe Giacomini for organizing a roundtable at Genoa city hall in January 2018 to share preliminary findings from this research.

References

Alter, Karen (2000) “The European Union's Legal System and Domestic Policy,” 54 International Organization 489–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen (2014) The New Terrain of International Law. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen (2016) “Jurist Advocacy Movements in Europe and the Andes,” 65 iCourts Working Paper Series 1–30.Google Scholar
Arksey, Hilary, & Knight, Peter (1999) Interviewing for Social Scientists. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, Derek, & Pedersen, Rasmus (2013) Process-Tracing Methods. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beissinger, Mark (2002) Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benna, Alessandro, & Compagnino, Lucia (2005) 30 Giugno 1960. Genoa: Frilli.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, & Checkel, Jeffrey, eds (2015) Process Tracing. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Jeffrey (2002) “Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviewing,” 35 PS: Political Science and Politics 679–82.Google Scholar
Blauberger, Michael, & Schmidt, Susanne (2017) “Free Movement, the Welfare State, and the European Union's Over-Constitutionalization,” 95 Public Administration 437–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobek, Michal (2014) “Landtova, Holubec, and the Problem of an Uncooperative Court,” 10 European Constitutional Law Rev 54–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borzel, Tanja (2006) “Participation Through Law Enforcement,” 39 Comparative Political Studies 128–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers (1994) “Rethinking Nationhood,” 4 Contention 3–14.Google Scholar
Burley, Anne-Marie, & Mattli, Walter (1993) “Europe Before the Court,” 47 International Organization 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capoccia, Giovanni, & Daniel Kelemen, R. (2007) “The Study of Critical Junctures,” 59 World Politics 341–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbone, Sergio, & Munari, Francesco (1994) “La legge italiana di riforma dei porti ed il diritto comunitario,” 114 Il Foro Italiano 367–92.Google Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel (2007) The European Court and Civil Society. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichowski, Rachel (2016) “The European Court of Human Rights, Amicus Curiae, and Violence against Women,” 50 Law & Society Rev. 890–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David (2011) “Understanding Process Tracing,” 44 PS: Political Science and Politics 823–30.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa (2002) Justice Contained. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, Lisa, et al. (2018) “Mobilizing European Law,” 25 J. of European Public Policy 1376–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costamagna, Giorgio (1965) Gli Statuti della Compagnia dei Caravana del Porto di Genova 1340–600. Turin, IT: Accademia della Scienza.Google Scholar
di Genova, Comune (2003) I Numeri e la Storia del Porto di Genova. Genoa: Sistema Statistico Nazionale.Google Scholar
Directorate General for Internal Policies. 2011. Judicial Training in the European Union Member States. Available at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/committees/studies.do?language=EN (accessed 17 May 2017).Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank (2000) Citizens, Experts, and the Environment. Durham: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Frymer, Paul (2003) “Acting When Elected Officials Won't,” 97 American Political Science Rev 483–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1983) “The Radiating Effect of Courts,” in Boyum & Mather, eds., Empirical Theories About Courts, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 2000 [1983]. Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gerring, John (2007) “Is There a (Viable) Crucial-case Method?” 40 Comparative Political Studies 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, & Cojocaru, Lee (2016) “Selecting Cases for Intensive Analysis,” 45 Sociological Methods & Research 392–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Paul (2003) A History of Contemporary Italy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974) Frame Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terrence, & Shaffer, Gregory, eds (2015) Transnational Legal Orders. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, Rebecca (2016) ““Foreign Criminals,” the Human Rights Act, and the New Constitutional Politics of the United Kingdom,” 4 J of Law & Courts 437–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilson, Chris (2002) “New Social Movements,” 9 J. of European Public Policy 238–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Andreas (2018) “Resistance against the Court of Justice of the European Union,” 14 International J. of Law in Context 258–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, & Marks, Gary (2009) “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration,” 39 British J. of Political Science 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, & Marks, Gary (2013) “Politicization,” in Jones, E., Menon, A., & Weatherhill, S., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the European Union. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199546282.013.0058.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel. (2006) “Suing for Europe,” 39 Comparative Political Studies 101–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel. (2009) “The Strength of Weak States.” Paper presented at the European Union Studies Association Conference, Marina Del Rey, CA, April 23rd-25th, 2009.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel (2011) Eurolegalism. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel, & Schmidt, Susanne (2011) “Introduction – The European Court of Justice and Legal Integration,” 19 J. of European Public Policy 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel, & Pavone, Tommaso (2016) “Mapping European Law,” 23 J. of European Public Policy 1118–38.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel, & Pavone, Tommaso (2018) “The Political Geography of Legal Integration,” 70 World Politics 358–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, Christian, & Roedl, Florian (2008) “Informal Politics, Formalised Law and the ‘Social Deficit’ of European Integration,” 15 European Law J. 1–19.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian (1996) “History, Historiography, and Political Science,” 90 American Political Science Rev 605–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindseth, Peter (2017) “Viking's Semantic Gaps,” in Nicola & Davies, ed., EU Law Stories. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida (2013) “The Legal Profession as a Social Process,” 38 Law & Social Inquiry 670–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, Mikael R., Olsen, Henrik Palmer, & Šadl, Urška (2017) “Competing Supremacies and Clashing Institutional Rationalities,” 23 European Law J. 140–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maduro, Miguel (1998) We the Court. New York: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (1984) “The Autonomous Power of the State,” 25 European J. of Sociology 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchesiello, Michele (2010) La Citta' Portuale. Rome: Aracane Editrice.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Clark (2004) “Resisting Empire,” in Jasanoff, S., & Martello, M. L., eds., Earthly Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew (2014) “Trust but Verify,” 23 Security Studies 663–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musso, Bruno (2008) Il Porto di Genova. Turin: Celid.Google Scholar
Musso, Bruno (2017) Il Cuore in Porto. Milan: Mursia Editore.Google Scholar
Nicola, Fernanda, & Davies, Bill, eds (2017) EU Law Stories. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavone, Tommaso (2018) “Revisiting Judicial Empowerment in the European Union,” 6 J. of Law & Courts 303–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perju, Vlad (2008) “Reason and Authority in the European Court of Justice,” 49 Virginia J. of International Law 307–78.Google Scholar
Pollack, Mark (2013) “The New EU Legal History,” 28 American University International Law Rev 1257–310.Google Scholar
Pouilot, Vincent (2007) “Sobjectivism,” 51 International Studies Quarterly 359–84.Google Scholar
Pouilot, Vincent (2015) “Practice Tracing,” in Bennett & Checkel, ed., Process Tracing. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Hjalte (2007) “Present and Future European Judicial Problems after Enlargement and the Post-2005 Ideological Revolt,” 44 Common Market Law Rev 1661–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Scheingold, Stuart (2006) Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall (1981) Historical Metaphors and Mythical Realities. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, Saskia (1994) Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe (1969) “Three Neofunctional Hypotheses About International Integration,” 23 International Organization 161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William (1996) “Historical Events as Transformations of Structures,” 25 Theory and Society 841–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David, & Benford, Robert (1988) “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization,” 1 International Social Movement Research 197–217.Google Scholar
Soennecken, Dagmar (2016) “The Paradox of Docket Control,” 38 Law & Policy 304–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec (2004) The Judicial Construction of Europe. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, & Brunell, Thomas (1998) “Constructing a Supranational Constitution,” 92 American Political Science Rev 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soifer, Hillel (2012) “The Causal Logic of Critical Junctures,” 45 Comparative Political Studies 1572–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansey, Oisin (2007) “Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing,” 40 PS: Political Science and Politics 765–72.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (2013) Economy and Society, Vol. II. Los Angeles and Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1991) “The Transformation of Europe,” 100 Yale Law J. 2403–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (1994) “A Quiet Revolution,” 26 Comparative Political Studies 510–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Joseph H. H. (2005) “Mutual Recognition, Functional Equivalence and Harmonization in the Evolution of the European Common Market and the WTO,” in Schioppa, Padoa, ed., The Principle of Mutual Recognition in the European Integration Process. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa (2012) “Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK,” 46 Law & Society Rev. 523–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa (2018) “Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds?” 51 Comparative Political Studies 380–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine (2008) “The Force of a Weak Field,” 2 International Political Sociology 128–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine (2015) Brokering Europe. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine (2017) “EU Law Classics in the Making,” in Nicola & Davies, ed., EU Law Stories. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine, & De Witte, Bruno (2013) Lawyering Europe. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael (2014) “The Politicization of World Politics and Its Effects,” 6 European Political Science Rev. 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar