Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T00:33:04.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Europeanization or National Specificity? Legal Approaches to Sexual Harassment in France, 2002–2012

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abigail C. Saguy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines whether—and if so how—a 2002 European Directive on sexual harassment has changed the practice and content of sexual harassment law in France. It finds that the European Directive shaped how French courts address sexual harassment and informed the content of a new sexual harassment law France passed in 2012. Yet, its influence has been mediated by dominant national attitudes about: (1) the nature of sexual harassment, (2) which legal institutions are best suited to address it, and (3) the character of women who claim to have been harassed. This paper further suggests that news reporting on a 2011 arrest of a French politician for sexual assault led to more positive attitudes about sexual harassment victims.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 140 - 171
Copyright
© 2018 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research received funding from the UCLA Faculty Senate and the Partner University Fund, a program of FACE. Thanks to the interview respondents and especially Marilyn Baldeck and Catherine LeMagueresse for their time, patience, and wisdom. Thanks to Laure Bereni, Gail Kligman, Eric Fassin, Liora Israel, Michael Stambolis-Ruhstorfer, Mallory Rees, Claire Saas, four anonymous LSR reviewers, and the LSR editors for helpful feedback.

References

AFP & Reuters (2012) “Le Conseil Constitutionnel Censure la loi sur le Harcèlement Sexuel,” Le Monde 4 (May), sec. Societe.Google Scholar
Assemblée Nationale (2016) “Report N° 4233,” in La Commission des Lois Constitutionnelles de la Législation et de l'Administration Génerale de la République, ed., Rapport d'information sur L'évaluation de la loi n° 2012-954 du 6 Août 2012 Relative au Harcèlement Sexuel. Paris, France: Presented by Pascale Crozon and Guy Geoffrey, Deputies.Google Scholar
AVFT (2006) 20 Ans de Lutte Contre les Violences Sexistes et Sexuelles au Travail. Fougeres, France: Graphicentre.Google Scholar
Badinter, Elisabeth (1991) “La Chasse aux Sorcières,” Le Nouvel Observateur 82 (October).Google Scholar
Berrey, Ellen, Nelson, Robert L., & Nielsen, Laura Beth (2017) Rights on Trial: How Workplace Discrimination Law Perpetuates Inequality. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boulet-Gercourt, Philippe (2011) “DSK Menotté: Le “Perp Walk” Mode D'emploi,” Le Nouvel Observateur 18 (May).Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristen (1988) The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore: John Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Conant, Lisa (2002) Justice Contained. Ithaca and London: Cornell Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, Lisa, et al. (2017) “Mobilizing European law, Journal of European Public Policy,” J. of European Public Policy 1–14. http://tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/13501763.2017.1329846?needAccess=trueGoogle Scholar
Cromer, Sylvie (1995) Le Harcèlement Sexuel en France: La Levée d'un Tabou 1985–1990. Paris: La Document Française.Google Scholar
Dekeuwer, Defossez (1993) “Le Harcèlement Sexuel en Droit Français: Discrimination ou Atteinte à la Liberté? (A Propos de L'article 222-23 du Nouveau Code Pénal et la loi n. 92–1179 du 2 Novembre 1992 Relative à L'abus D'autorité en Matière Sexuelle),” 3662 La Semaine Juridique 137–41.Google Scholar
Dimitrova, Antoaneta & Rhinard, Mark (2005) “The Power of Norms in the Transposition of EU Directives,” 9 European Integration Online Papers (EIoP) 1–22.Google Scholar
Estrich, Susan (1988) Real Rape. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. & Caldeira, Gregory A. (1996) “The Legal Cultures of Europe,” 30 Law and Society Rev. 55–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, Jane & Sineau, Mariette (1995) Mitterand et les Françaises: Un Rendez-Vous Manqué. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
Karlin, Élise (2011) “La Descente aux Enfers de DSK,” L'Express 17 (May), sec. Politique.Google Scholar
Sceaux, La Garde Des (2012) Pre'sentation des Dispositions de Droit Pe'nal et de Proce'dure Pe'nale de la Loi n° 2012- 954 du 6 Août 2012 Relative au Harcélement Sexuel. Paris, France: Ministre de la Justice.Google Scholar
Barnum, Le Grand (2011) “De L'affaire DSK Comme « Troussage de Domestique »: Jean-François Kahn et L'inconscient Machiste Français,” 2014 Le Grand Barnum. https://www.lexpress.fr/actualite/politique/l-affaire-dsk-un-troussage-de-domestique-kahn-s-excuse_994399.htmlGoogle Scholar
Le Magueresse, Catherine (2005) NON!, La France N'est Toujours pas en Conformité Avec le Droit Européen en Matière de Harcèlement Sexuel. Available at: http://avft.org/article.php?id_article=282 (accessed 18 February 2016).Google Scholar
Le Magueresse, Catherine (2008) “Harcelement Sexuel en France: Les Errements du Droit,” The Reality of Sexual Harassment at Work and the French Law: Criticism and Proposals for Reform. Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
Le Magueresse, Catherine (2011) “De la Nécessaire Critique Féministe du Droit,” 2 Jurisprudence – Revue Critique 157–60.Google Scholar
Le Magueresse, Catherine (2014a) “La (dis-)Qualification Pénal des “Violences Sexuelles” Commises par les Hommes à L'encontre de Femmes,” in Regine, ed., Le Droit Français au Prisme du genre. Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
Le Magueresse, Catherine (2014b) “La Reconnaissance Législative et Jurisprudentielle du Harcèlement Sexuel, Une Victoire Féministe? (1992–2012),” 2 Cahiers Du Genre 115–38.Google Scholar
Le Nouvel Observateur (2011) “Jean-François Kahn: Pas de viol, Mais un « Troussage de Domestique,” Le Nouvel Observateur (May 18).Google Scholar
Lee, Timothy (2016) “Brexit: The 7 Most Important Arguments for Britain to Leave the EU,” Vox 25 (June).Google Scholar
Levy, Bernard-Henri (2011) “Le Bloc-Notes de Bernard-Henri Levy,” Le Point 17 (May).Google Scholar
Ozouf, Mona (1995) Les Mots des Femmes: Essai Sur La Singularité Française. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Piefer, Sally A. (1993) “Comment, Sexual Harassment from the Victim's Perspective: The Need for the Seventh Circuit to Adopt the Reasonable Woman Standard,” 77 Marq. L. Rev 85.Google Scholar
Rigaud, Aline (2013) Il a Fait de moi sa Proie. Flammarion.Google Scholar
Roy-Loustaunau, Claude (1995) “Le Droit du Harcèlement Sexuel: Un Puzzle Législatif et des Choix Novateurs,” 6 Droit Social 545–50.Google Scholar
Saas, Claire (Forthcoming) “20 Ans de Jurisprudence Pénale sur le Harcèlement Sexuel—Réflexions sur le Corps et al Liberté Sexuelle des Femmes Saisis par le Droit Pénal,” in Hennette-Vauchez, S., Roman, D & Pichard, M., eds., Le Droit Français au Prisme du Genre. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Saguy, Abigail C. (2000) “Employment Discrimination or Sexual Violence?: Defining Sexual Harassment in American, and French Law,” 34 Law and Society Rev. 1091–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saguy, Abigail C. (2003) What Is Sexual Harassment? from Capitol Hill to the Sorbonne. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saguy, Abigail C. (2012) “Les Conceptions Juridiques du Harcèlement Sexuel en France et aux Etats-Unis: Avant et Après l'affaire DSK,” 28 Travail Genre Et Sociétés 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J. (1998) Unwanted Sex: The Culture of Intimidation and the Failure of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Vicki (1990) “Telling Stories about Women and Work: Judicial Interpretations of Sex Segregation in the Workplace in Title VII Cases Raising the Lack of Interest Argument,” 103 Harvard Law Rev. 1749–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Charles W. (2015) “Appendix B: The Interplay of Ethnography and Markets,” What the Market Teaches Us: Limitations of Knowing and Tactics for Doing. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, Paige L. (2015) “Chronic Victims, Risky Women: Domestic Violence Advocacy and the Medicalization of Abuse,” 41 Signs 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The New York Times Editorial Board (2011) “Sexual harassment 20 years later,” The New York Times 21 (October).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Michael & Jamieson, Sophie (2016) “Battle for Brexit is like ‘David and Goliath' declares Boris Johnson on biggest day of EU referendum campaign yet,” The Telegraph 14 (May), sec. News.Google Scholar
Wind, Marlene (2010) “The Nordics, the EU and the Reluctance Towards Supranational Judicial Review,” 48 JCMS: J. of Common Market Studies 1039–63.Google Scholar
Zhelyazkova, Asya & Torenvlied, Rene' (2011) “The Successful Transposition of European Provisions by Member States: Application to the Framework Equality Directive,” 18 J. of European Public Policy 690–708. (5)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zippel, Kathrin (2006) The Politics of Sexual Harassment: A Comparative Study of the United States, the European Union, and Germany. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zippel, Kathrin (2009) “The European Union 2002 Directive on Sexual Harassment: A Feminist Success?” 7 Comparative European Politics 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar