Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T00:58:54.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Constituencies of Elite Urban Lawyers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

John P. Heinz ,
Edward O. Laumann ,
Robert L. Nelson  and
Paul S. Schnorr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study analyzes Chicago lawyers' networks of relationships with a selected set of prominent practitioners, drawing on 1994–95 interviews with 788 randomly selected respondents. Since the same technique was used 20 years earlier, the research sheds light on the extent to which the constituencies of elite Chicago lawyers have changed. The network is organized in three principal sectors—liberals, trial lawyers, and corporate lawyers. The structure implies a lack of integration within the bar. Minorities and women are now more widely dispersed across the segments of the network than they were in 1975, but they still have relatively few connections in the corporate sector of the bar.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , 1997 , pp. 441 - 472
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Support for this work was provided by grants from the American Bar Endowment, Northwestern University's Institute for Policy Research, the National Science Foundation (#SBR-9411515), and the Chicago Bar Foundation. The article is based on a report presented at the Law and Society Association Annual Meetings, Glasgow, Scotland, July 1996. The authors acknowledge, with gratitude, the contributions to this work of Brian Gran, Kathleen Hull, Rebecca Sandefur, and Stephanie Walke.

References

Guttman, Louis (1968) “A General Nonmetric Technique for Finding the Smallest Coordinate Space for a Configuration of Points,” 33 Psychometrika 469–506.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., & Laumann, Edward O. (1982) Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O.-(1994) Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. Rev. ed. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., Nelson, Robert L., & Salisbury, Robert H. (1993) The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., & Manikas, Peter M. (1992) “Networks among Elites in a Local Criminal Justice System,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 831–61.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. (1964) “Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis,” 29 Psychometrika 1–27.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O. (1973) Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., & Pappi, Franz Urban (1976) Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., & Simon, Herbert Alexander, with collaboration of Guetzkow, Harold (1958) Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L. (1994) “The Futures of American Lawyers: A Demographic Profile of a Changing Profession in a Changing Society,” 44 Case Western Reserve Law Rev. 345–406.Google Scholar
Powell, Michael (1979) “Anatomy of a Counter-Bar Association: The Chicago Council of Lawyers,” 1979 American Bar Foundation Research J. 501–41.Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E. (1976) “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems,” 21 Administrative Science Q. 1–19.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David B., & Gulati, G. Mitu (1996) “Why Are There So Few Black Lawyers in Corporate Law Firms? An Institutional Analysis,” 84 California Law Rev. 493–625.Google Scholar