Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T10:12:09.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Capital Punishment and Contemporary Values: People's Misgivings and the Court's Misperceptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

William Bowers
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Twenty years after the Supreme Court struck down existing death penalty statutes (Furman v. Georgia 1972) and a day after Justice Thurgood Marshall's death, the senior Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Harry Blackmun, charged the Court with coming “perilously close to murder” in its latest death penalty ruling. He made this charge in an unusual oral dissent from a decision which held that a federal appeals court could not hear newly developed evidence of a death row inmate's possible innocence (Herrera v. Collins 1992). The Court, nine months earlier, had barred a lower federal court from hearing new evidence challenging execution by asphyxiation as cruel punishment (Gomez v. U.S. District Court 1992) and had then taken the unprecedented step of ordering no further stays of execution (Vasquez v. Harris 1992).1 How did we reach this point when 20 years earlier the Court had declared that the death penalty as applied was too arbitrary to be constitutionally acceptable, and when virtually all other modern industrialized nations of the free world either had already, or soon would, do away with capital punishment?

Type
Symposium: Research on the Death Penalty
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , 1993 , pp. 157 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I wish to thank Margaret Vandiver, Ken Haas, and Joe Hoffmann for helpful comments on short notice, and Patricia Dugan, Andrea Waldo, Heather MacAskill, and Peter Wong for helping me get the data and references together.

References

References

Baldus, David C., Woodworth, George, & Pulaski, Charles A. Jr. (1990) Equal Justice and the Death Penalty: A Legal and Empirical Analysis. Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Bass, Jack (1990) Unlikely Heroes. Tuscaloosa: Univ. of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Black, Charles L. Jr. (1981) Capital Punishment: The Inevitability of Caprice and Mistake. 2d ed. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Bohm, Robert M. (1991) “American Death Penalty Opinion, 1936–1986: A Critical Examination of the Gallup Polls,” in Bohm, R. M., ed., The Death Penalty in America: Current Research. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bowers, William J., & Vandiver, Margaret (1991a) New Yorkers Want an Alternative to the Death Penalty: Executive Summary of a New York State Survey. Boston: Criminal Justice Research Center, Northeastern Univ. (April).Google Scholar
Vandiver, Margaret (1991b) Nebraskans Want an Alternative to the Death Penalty: Executive Summary of Nebraska State Survey. Boston: Criminal Justice Research Center, Northeastern Univ. (May).Google Scholar
Bowers, William J., Vandiver, Margaret, & Dugan, Patricia H. (in press) “People Want an Alternative to the Death Penalty: A New Look at Public Opinion.” Criminal Justice Research Center, Northeastern Univ.Google Scholar
Cambridge Survey Research (1986) An Analysis of Political Attitudes Towards the Death Penalty in the State of Florida: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: Cambridge Survey Research.Google Scholar
Cambridge Survey Research (1989) New York Public Opinion Poll—The Death Penalty: An Executive Summary. Washington DC: Cambridge Survey Research.Google Scholar
Death Penalty Information Center (1992) Millions Misspent: What Politicians Don't Say about the High Costs of the Death Penalty. Washington, DC: The Center.Google Scholar
Institute, Field (1990) Press Release: Continuing Strong Support for Death Penalty. San Francisco: Field Institute (27 March).Google Scholar
Fox, James Alan, Radelet, Michael L., & Bonsteel, Julie L. (1990–91) “Death Penalty Opinion in the Post-Furman Years,” New York Univ. Rev. of Law & Social Change 18.Google Scholar
Good, Andrew (1993) “Book Review,” 17 Champion (in press).Google Scholar
Gross, Samuel R., & Mauro, Robert (1989) Death and Discrimination: Racial Disparities in Capital Sentencing. Boston: Northeastern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Haney, Craig, & Hurtado, Aida (1989) Californian's Attitudes about the Death Penalty: Results of a Statewide Survey. Santa Cruz: Univ. of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Joseph L. (1993) “The ‘Cruel and Unusual Punishment’ Clause: A Limit on the Power to Punish, or Constitutional Rhetoric?” in Bodenhamer, D. J. & Ely, J. W. Jr., eds., The Bill of Rights in Modern America: After 200 Years. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Jurow, George L. (1971) “New Data on the Effect of a ‘Death Qualified’ Jury on the Guilt Determination Process,” 84 Harvard Law Rev. 567.Google Scholar
Lane, J. Mark (1993) “Is There Life without Parole? A Capital Defendant's Right to a Meaningful Alternative Sentence,” 26 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Rev. 325.Google Scholar
NAACP Legal & Educational Defense Fund (1993) Death Row U.S.A. Reporter. New York: NAACP Legal & Educational Defense Fund.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Michael (1990) “The Political Stampede on Execution,” New York Times, 4 April, sec. A, p. 16.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Stephen (1992) “The Supreme Court, the Death Penalty, and the Harris Case,” 102 Yale Law J. 205.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Vidmar, Neil (1976) “Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Eighth Amendment: Testing the Marshall Hypothesis,” 1976 Wisconsin Law Rev. 171.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L., Adams, Rebecca, Heimer, Carol A., Scheppele, Kim Lane, Smith, Tom W., & Taylor, D. Garth (1980) Crime and Punishment—Changing Attitudes in America. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Thomas, Robert H., & Hutchinson, John D. Jr. (1986) Georgia Residents' Attitudes toward the Death Penalty, the Disposition of Juvenile Offenders, and Related Issues. Atlanta: Center for Public & Urban Research, Georgia State Univ..Google Scholar
Vidmar, Neil, & Ellsworth, Phoebe (1974) “Public Opinion and the Death Penalty,” 26 Stanford Law Rev. 1245.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Robert (1983) “Deregulating Death,” 1983 The U. S. Supreme Court Review 305.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E., & Hawkins, Gordon (1986) Capital Punishment and the American Agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496 (1987).Google Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
Fowler v. North Carolina, 285 N.C. 90, cert. granted, 419 U.S. 963 (1974), order for reargument revoked, 424 U.S. 903 (1976).Google Scholar
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez v. U.S. District Court, 112 S.Ct. 1652, 119 L.Ed.2d 561 (1992).Google Scholar
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).Google Scholar
Herrera v. Collins, 112 S.Ct. 2936, 119 L.Ed.2d 561 (1993).Google Scholar
Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart v. McCree, 476 U.S. 162 (1976).Google Scholar
McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).Google Scholar
McGautha v. California, 402 U.S. 183 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne v. Tennessee, 111 S.Ct. 2597, 115 L.Ed.2d 720 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penry v. Lynaugh, 492 U.S. 302 (1989).Google Scholar
Proffitt v. Florida, 428 U.S. 242 (1976).Google Scholar
Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989).Google Scholar
State v. Simmons, S.C. S.Ct., #23784, 1 Feb. 1993 (unpub.).Google Scholar
Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez v. Harris, 112 S.Ct. 1713, 118 L.Ed.2d 419 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weems v. United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910).Google Scholar
Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968).Google Scholar
Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976).Google Scholar