Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T17:47:00.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bright-Line Fever: Simple Legal Rules and Complex Property Customs among the Fataluku of East Timor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

Recent law and economics scholarship has revived a debate on bright-line rules in property theory. Economic analysis asserts a baseline preference for bright-line property rules because of the information costs if “all the world” had to understand a range of permitted uses, or deal with multiple interest holders in a resource. A baseline preference for bright-line rules of property arises from the cost of communicating information: all else being equal, complex rules suit smaller audiences (e.g., contracting parties) and simple rules suit large audiences (e.g., property transactors, violators, and enforcers). This article explores the circumstances in which a simple rule, purportedly for a large audience, takes on interpretive complexity as it traverses specialized audience segments. The argument draws on two heuristic strands of recent sociolegal scholarship: systems theory notions of autopoiesis, and concepts of negotiability in plural property relations. The potential for complex interpretations of simple legal rules is illustrated through a case study of the Fataluku language group in the district of Lautem, East Timor.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2013 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors wish to thank Henry Smith, Susana Barnes, Rebecca Monson, and two anonymous reviewers for their insights and comments. The authors owe a considerable debt of gratitude to the people of Lautem and to members of East Timor's Land and Property Unit. Research for this article was funded by a grant from the Australian Research Council (Discovery Project DP0556531).

References

References

Atuahene, Bernadette (2010a) “Property and Transitional Justice,” 58 UCLA L. Rev. Disc 65.Google Scholar
Atuahene, Bernadette (2010b) “Property Rights and the Demands of Transformation,” 31 Michigan J. of International Law 765820.Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter, Fox, James J., & Tryson, Darrell (1995) The Austronesians: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National Univ.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, Franz von, von Benda-Beckmann, Keebet, & Wiber, Melanie G. (2006) “The Properties of Property,” in von Benda-Beckman, F., von Benda-Beckmann, K., & Wiber, M., eds., Changing Properties of Property. New York: Berghahn Books. 139.Google Scholar
Benda-Beckmann, Keebet von (1981) “Forum Shopping and Shopping Forums, Dispute Processing in a Minangkabau Village in North Sumatra,” 19 J. of Legal Pluralism 117160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, Sara (1993) No Condition Is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change in Sub-Saharan Africa. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Sara (1997) “Tomatoes, Land and Hearsay, Property and History in Asante in the Time of Structural Adjustment,” 25 World Development 12251241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomley, Nicholas (2003) “Law, Property and the Geography of Violence: The Frontier, the Survey, and the Grid,” 93 Annals of the Association of American Geographers 121141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John Bradford (2002) “Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty,” 27 Australian J. of Legal Philosophy 4782.Google Scholar
Budiardjo, Carmel, & Liong, Liem Soei (1984) The War Against East Timor. London, UK: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Chanock, Martin (1991) “A Peculiar Sharpness: An Essay on Property in the History of Customary Law in Colonial Africa,” 32 The J. of African History 6588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukeminier, Jesse, & Krier, James E. (1993) Property, 3rd ed. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Dunn, James (1983) Timor: A People Betrayed. Sydney: ABC Books.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1986) Law's Empire. Harvard: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. (1989) “A Hypothesis of Wealth-Maximizing Norms: Evidence from the Whaling Industry,” 5 J. of Law, Economics, and Organization, 8397.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. (1979) “Possession as the Root of Title,” 13 Georgia Law Rev. 12211243.Google Scholar
Fairhead, James, & Leach, Melissa (1996) Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fennell, Lee Anne (2007) “Property and Half-Torts,” 116 The Yale Law J. 14001471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Daniel (2002) Land Claims in East Timor. Canberra: Asia Pacific Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Daniel (2006) “Evolution and Chaos in Property Systems: The Third World Tragedy of Contested Access,” 115 The Yale Law J. 9961048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Daniel, & Barnes, Susana (2010) “The Relative Resilience of Property: First Possession and Order Without Law in East Timor,” 44 Law & Society Rev. 205238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Daniel, McWilliam, Andrew, & Barnes, Susana (2013) Property and Social Resilience in Times of Conflict: Land, Custom and Law in East Timor. Surry, UK: Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
Forbes, H.O. (1885) A Naturalist's Wanderings in the Eastern Archipelago: A Narrative of Travel and Exploration from 1876–1883. London, UK; New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Forman, Shephard (1980) “Descent, Alliance and Exchange Ideology among the Makassae of East Timor,” in Fox, J. J., ed., The Flow of Life: Essays on Eastern Indonesia. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press. 152177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, James J. (1996) “The Transformation of Progenitor Lines of Origin: Patterns of Precedence in Eastern Indonesia,” in Fox, J. J., & Sather, C., eds., Origins, Ancestry and Alliance: Explorations in Austronesian Ethnography. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National Univ. 130153.Google Scholar
Gillespie, John (2008) “Towards a Discursive Analysis of Legal Transfers into Developing East Asia,” 40 New York Univ. J. of International Law and Politics 658718.Google Scholar
Gillespie, John (2011) “Exploring the Limits of the Judicialization of Urban Land Disputes in Vietnam,” 45 Law & Society Rev. 241276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of Timor Leste (2010) Timor-Leste Strategic Development Plan 2011–2030. Dili: Timor Leste.Google Scholar
Hicks, David (1976) Tetum Ghosts and Kin: Fieldwork in an Indonesian Community. Palo Alto: Mayfield.Google Scholar
Knetsch, Jack, & Trebilcock, Michael (1981) “Land Policy and Economic Development in Papua New Guinea,” Institute of National Affairs Discussion Paper No 6. Port Moresby, PNG: Institute of National Affairs.Google Scholar
Krier, James E. (2009) “Evolutionary Theory and the Origin of Property Rights,” 95 Cornell Law Rev. 139159.Google Scholar
Lavigne Delville, Phillipe (2000) “Harmonizing Formal Law and Customary Land Rights in French-Speaking West Africa,” in Toulmin, C., & Quan, J., eds., Evolving Land Rights, Policy and Tenure in Africa. London, UK: DFID/IIED/NRI. 97122.Google Scholar
Lencastre, Julio Garcez de (1929) “Aspectos da Administracão de Timor,” 54 Boletim de Agência Geral das Colonias 3254.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1995) Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press [Trans. John Bednarz, Jr. with Dirk Baecker].Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (2004) Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press [Trans. Klaus A. Ziegert].Google Scholar
Lund, Christian (2002) “Negotiating Property Institutions: On the Symbiosis of Property and Authority in Africa,” in Juul, K., & Lund, C., eds., Negotiating Property in Africa. Portsmouth: Heinemann. 1142.Google Scholar
Lund, Christian (2008) Local Politics and the Dynamics of Property in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliam, Andrew R. (2002) Paths of Origin, Gates of Life: A Study of Place and Precedence in Southwest Timor. Leiden: KITLV Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliam, Andrew R. (2007a) “Austronesians in Linguistic Disguise: Fataluku Cultural Fusion in East Timor,” 38 J. of Southeast Asian Studies 355375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliam, Andrew R. (2007b) “Harbouring Traditions: Marginality in a Lowland Entrepôt,” 41 Modern Asian Studies 11131143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliam, Andrew R. (2007c) “Customary Claims and the Public Interest: On Fataluku Resource Entitlements in Lautem,” in Kingsbury, D., & Leach, M., eds., East Timor: Beyond Independence. Melbourne: Monash Asia Institute Press. 165178.Google Scholar
McWilliam, Andrew R. (2011a) “Fataluku Living Landscapes,” in McWilliam, A, & Traube, E.G., eds., Land and Life in Timor-Leste: Ethnographic Essays. Canberra: ANU E-Press. 6168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliam, Andrew R. (2011b) “Exchange and Resilience in Timor-Leste,” 17 J. of the Royal Anthropological Institute (n.s.) 745763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas (1984) “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Adverse Possession,” 79 Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 1122.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas, & Smith, Henry (2000) “Optimal Standardization in the Law of Property: The Numerus Clausus Principle,” 110 The Yale Law J. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas, & Smith, Henry (2001) “What Happened to Property in Law and Economics?,” 111 The Yale Law J. 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrill, Thomas, & Smith, Henry (2007) “The Morality of Property,” 48 William & Mary Law Rev. 1849.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas, & Smith, Henry (2011) “Making Coasean Property More Coasean,” (February 9, 2011). 54 J. of Law and Economics s77s104; Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Sally F. (1978) Law as Process: An Anthropological Approach. London, UK; Boston: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, Sally F. (1998) “Changing African Land Tenure: Reflections on the Incapacities of the State,” 10 European J. of Development Research 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, Sue, et al. (2012) “Examining the Origin of Fortifications in East Timor: Social and Environmental Factors,” 7 J. of Island and Coastal Archaeology 118.Google Scholar
Paterson, John, & Teubner, Gunther (1998) “Changing Maps: Empirical Legal Autopoiesis,” 7 Social & Legal Studies 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penner, James E. (1997) The Idea of Property in Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Pauline (2002) “The Limits of Negotiability: Security, Equity and Class Formation in Africa's Land Systems,” in Juul, K., & Lund, C., eds., Negotiating Property in Africa. Portsmouth: Heinemann. 4556.Google Scholar
Platteau, Jean-Phillipe (1996) “The Evolutionary Theory of Land Rights as Applied to Sub-Saharan Africa: A Critical Assessment,” 27 Development and Change 2986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Carol (1985) “Possession as the Origin of Property,” 52 Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Boaventura De Sousa (1987) “Law: A Map of Misreading; Toward a Postmodern Conception of Law,” 14 J. of Law and Society 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. (1998) Seeing Like a State: How How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven; London, UK: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shipton, Parker (1994) “Land and Culture in Tropical Africa: Soils, Symbols, and the Metaphysics of the Mundane,” 23 Annual Rev. of Anthropology 347377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry E. (2000) “Semicommon Property Rights and Scattering in the Open Fields,” 29 J. of Legal Studies 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Henry E. (2003) “The Language of Property: Form, Context, and Audience,” 55 Stanford Law Rev. 11051191.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry E. (2009) “Community and Property: Community and Custom in Property,” 10 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 5.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert (1986) The Economics of Rights, Cooperation, and Welfare. New York; Oxford: B. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert (1989) “Spontaneous Order,” 3 J. of Economic Perspectives, 8890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. (1999) East Timor: The Price of Freedom (Politics in Contemporary Asia). Annandale: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1988) “Introduction to Autopoietic Law,” in Teubner, G., ed., Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1992) “The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism,” 13 Cardozo Law Rev. 14431462.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers [Trans. Anne Bankowska and Ruth Adler].Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1998) “Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergences,” 61 Modern Law Rev. 1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traube, Elizabeth (1986) Cosmology and Social Life: Ritual Exchange among the Mambai of East Timor. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael (1984) “Communal Property Rights: The Papua New Guinean Experience,” 34 Univ. of Toronto Law J. 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trebilcock, Michael, & Veel, Peter (2008) “Property Rights and Development: The Contingent Case for Formalization,” 30 Univ. of Pennsylvania J. of International Law 397.Google Scholar
Vandergeest, Peter, & Peluso, Nancy (1995) “Territorialization and State Power in Thailand,” 24 Theory and Society 385426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank (2009) 2009 Update of Poverty Incidence in Timor-Leste Using the Survey-to-Survey Imputation Method. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Zerbe, Richard O., & Anderson, C. Leigh (2001) “Culture and Fairness in the Development of Institutions in the California Gold Fields,” 61 J. of Economic History 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cases Cited

Ghen v. Rich, 8 F. 159, 159–160 (D. Mass. 1881).Google Scholar
Pierson v. Post, 3 Cai. R. 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1805).Google Scholar
Swift v. Gifford, 23 Fed. Cas. 558 (D. Mass. 1872).Google Scholar