Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T23:01:52.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

After the “Social Meaning Turn”: Implications for Research Design and Methods of Proof in Contemporary Criminal Law Policy Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Bernard E. Harcourt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The social norm movement in criminal justice has received a lot of attention in academic and public policy circles. This essay critically examines social norm writings and explores some of the implications for methods of proof and research design in the social sciences. In the process, the essay offers an alternative theoretical approach. This alternative focuses on the multiple ways in which the social meaning of practices (such as juvenile gun possession, gang membership, or disorderly conduct) and the social meaning of policing techniques (such as juvenile snitching policies, youth curfews, or order-maintenance policing) may shape us as contemporary subjects of society. This alternative theoretical approach has its own important implications for methods of proof and research design, and the essay develops these implications into a four-prong research agenda.

Type
Symposium on Norms, Law, and Order in the City
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , 2000 , pp. 179 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to Bruce Ackerman, Seyla Benhabib, Suzie Dovi, David Garland, Dan Kahan, Duncan Kennedy, Toni Massaro, Tracey Meares, Frank Michelman, Martha Minow, Stephen Morse, Ted Schneyer, Stephen Schulhofer, Carol Steiker, Dalia Tsuk, and Richard Tuck for insightful comments and criticisms, as well as to the participants at the 2000 Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum. Special thanks to Susan Silbey.

Editor's comment: This paper was accepted through juried review for presentation at the Stanford/Yale Junior Faculty Forum May 12–13, 2000.

References

References

Alschuler, Albert W., & Schulhofer, Stephen J. (1998) “Antiquated Procedures or Bedrock Rights?: A Response to Professors Meares and Kahan,” 1998 Univ. of Chicago Legal Forum 215–44.Google Scholar
Balsdon, Sam (1996) “Improving the Management of Juvenile Informants,” Policing & Reducing Crime, Home Office, Research, Development & Statistics Directorate (unpublished manuscript on file with author).Google Scholar
Blumstein, Alfred, & Cork, Daniel (1996) “Linking Gun Availability to Youth Gun Violence,” 59 Law and Contemporary Problems 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice (Richard Nice trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990) In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology (Matthew Adamson, trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1994) Raisons Pratiques: Sur la theorie de Faction. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, with Wacquant, Loic J.D. (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burnham, Margaret A. (1999) “Twice Victimized,” 24 Boston Rev. 16–17 (Apr.-May).Google Scholar
Butterfield, Fox (1996) “Police Chief's Success in Charleston, S.C., Is What's Raising Eyebrows Now,” New York Times, 28 Apr., p. 16.Google Scholar
Cole, David (1999) Foreword: “Discretion and Discrimination Reconsidered: A Response to the New Criminal Justice Scholarship,” 87 Georgetown Law J. 1059–93.Google Scholar
Dershowitz, Alan M. (1999) “Rights and Interests,” 24 Boston Rev. 10 (Apr.-May).Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1991) Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. (1998) “Law and Economics Discovers Social Norms,” 27 Journal of Legal Studies 537–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (1999) “Getting it Right,” 24 Boston Rev. 11 (Apr.–May 1999).Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1989) The Cement of Society: A Study of Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagan, Jeffrey (1999) “Social Contagion of Violence.” Presented at the Fortunoff Colloquium Series, Center for Research on Crime and Justice, New York University Law School, 19 Apr.Google Scholar
Farge, Arlette & Foucault, Michel (1982) Le Desordre des Familles: Lettres de cachet des Archives de la Bastille au XVIIIe siecle. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1970) The Order of Things (translation of 1966 Les mots et les choses Paris: Gallimard). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc & Edwards, Mark Alan (1997) “Introduction: The Path of the Law Ands” 1997 Wisconsin Law Rev. 375–87.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1972) “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight,” 101 Daedalus 1–37 (winter).Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays by Clifford Geertz. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1995) After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, Michael R., & Hirschi, Travis (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian (1999) The Social Construction of What? Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E. (1998) “Reflecting on the Subject: A Critique of the Social Influence Conception of Deterrence, the Broken Windows Theory, and Order-Maintenance Policing New York Style,” 97 Michigan Law Rev. 291–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E. (1999a) “Matrioshka Dolls,” 24 Boston Rev. 19–20 (Apr.-May).Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E. (1999b) “The Collapse of the Harm Principle,” 90 J. of Criminal Law & Criminology 109–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington-Lueker, Donna (1992) “Metal Detectors: Schools Turn to Devices Once Aimed Only at Airport Terrorists,” The American School Board J. (May), pp. 26–27.Google Scholar
Huber, Steve (1999) Interview with Officer Steve Huber at Magee Middle School conducted on 16 Nov. by Bernard Harcourt (transcript in author's file).Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. (1997a) “Social Influence, Social Meaning, and Deterrence,” 83 Virginia Law Rev. 349–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. (1997b) “Between Economics and Sociology: The New Path of Deterrence,” 95 Michigan Law Rev. 2477–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. (1998) “Social Meaning and the Economic Analysis of Crime,” 27 J. of Legal Studies 609–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. (1999) “Privatizing Criminal Law: Strategies for Private Norm Enforcement in the Inner City,” 46 U.C.L.A. Law Rev. 1859–72.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., & Meares, Tracey L. (1998a) Foreword: “The Coming Crisis of Criminal Procedure,” 86 Georgetown Law J. 1153–84.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., & Meares, Tracey L. (1998b) “Law and (Norms of) Order in the Inner City,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 805–38.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., & Meares, Tracey L. (1999) “When Rights Are Wrong,” 24 Boston Rev. 4-8 (Apr.-May), and “Meares and Kahan Respond,” 24 Boston Rev. 22-23 (Apr.-May).Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., & Verba, Sidney (1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., & Verba, Sidney (1995) “The Importance of Research Design in Political Science,” 89 American Political Science Rev. 475–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFree, Gary, & Birkbeck, Christopher (1998) Working Paper No. 27. “Controlling New Mexico Juveniles' Possession of Firearms,” New Mexico Criminal Justice Statistical Analysis Center, Univ. of NM Institute for Social Research (unpublished manuscript on file with author).Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence (1995) “The Regulation of Social Meaning,” 62 Univ. of Chicago Law Rev. 943–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence (1996) “Social Meaning and Social Norms,” 144 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 2181–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence (1998) “The New Chicago School,” 27 J. of Legal Studies 661–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massaro, Toni M. (1990) “Shame, Culture, and American Criminal Law,” 89 Michigan Law Rev. 1880–1944.Google Scholar
Massaro, Toni M. (1997) “The Meanings of Shame: Implications for Legal Reform,” 3 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 645–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massaro, Toni M. (1998) “The Gang's Not Here,” 2 The Green Bag 25–34.Google Scholar
Massaro, Toni M. (1999) “Show (Some) Emotions,” in Bandes, S., ed., The Passions of Law. New York: NY Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Meares, Tracey L. (1998a) “Social Organization and Drug Law Enforcement,” 35 American Criminal Law Rev. 191–227.Google Scholar
Meares, Tracey L. (1998b) “Place and Crime,” 73 Chicago-Kent Law Rev. 669–705.Google Scholar
Pattillo, Mary E., & May, Reuben A.B. (1994) “Gun Talk: Culture and Social Control in an African-American Community,” Center for the Study of Urban Inequality, Irving B. Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies, Univ. of Chicago (unpublished manuscript on file with author).Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1998) “Social Norms, Social Meaning, and Economic Analysis of Law: A Comment,” 27 J. of Legal Studies 553–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichardt, Charles S., & Rallis, Sharon F. (1994) “The Relationship Between the Qualitative and Quantitative Research Traditions,” 5–11, in C. S. Reichardt & S. F. Rallis, eds., The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives, in New Directions for Program Evaluation No. 61 (spring).Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy E. (1999) Foreword: “Race, Vagueness, and the Social Meaning of Order-Maintenance Policing,” 89 J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 775–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneyer, Theodore J. (1971) “Problems in the Cost-Benefit Analysis of Marijuana Legislation,” 24 Stanford Law Rev. 200–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneyer, Theodore J. (1993) “Policymaking and the Perils of Professionalism: The ABA's Ancillary Business Debate as a Case Study,” 35 Arizona Law Rev. 363–96.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J. (1984) “Is Plea Bargaining Inevitable?” 97 Harvard Law Rev. 1037–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J. (1986) “No Job Too Small: Justice Without Bargaining in the Lower Criminal Courts,” 1985 American Bar Foundation Research J. 519–98.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J., & Alschuler, Albert W. (2000) “Getting the Facts Straight: Crime Trends, Community Support, and the Police Enforcement of ‘Social Norms’.” (unpublished manuscript, on file with author).Google Scholar
Seale, Clive (1998) Introduction to Clive Seale, ed., Researching Society and Culture. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Skogan, Wesley G. (1999) “Everybody's Business,” 24 Boston Rev. 15–16 (Apr.–May).Google Scholar
Steiker, Carol S. (1999) “More Wrong Than Rights,” 24 Boston Rev. 13–14 (Apr.–May).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1999) “To Follow a Rule ...”, in R. Shusterman, ed., Bourdieu: A Critical Reader. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (1998) “‘Everything Old Is New Again’: Early Reflections on the ‘New Chicago School,‘” 1998 Wisconsin Law Rev. 579–90.Google Scholar
Wilson, James Q., & Kelling, George L. (1982) “Broken Windows,” The Atlantic Monthly, March 1982, pp. 29–38.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. (1999) “Mystery Terms,” 24 Boston Rev. 17–18 (Apr.-May).Google Scholar

Cases Cited

City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41 (1999).Google Scholar