Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T00:10:10.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toward a Natural History of Ethical Censorship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Comment on the Presidential Address
Copyright
© 2007 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AAUP (2006) “Research on Human Subjects: Academic Freedom and the Institutional Review Board,” http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/About/committees (accessed 20 May 2007).Google Scholar
Ballard, Rachel (2003) “BYU Declines Student's Study of Homosexuals,” The Daily Universe. 23 July p. 1.Google Scholar
Binson, Diane, et al. (2001) “Differential HIV Risk in Bathhouses and Public Cruising Areas,” 91 American J. of Public Health 1481–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bittner, Egon (1967) “The Police on Skid-Row: A Study of Peace Keeping,” 32 American Sociological Rev. 699715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosk, Charles (2001) “Irony, Ethnography, and Informed Consent,” in Hoffmaster, B., ed., Bioethics in Social Context. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Britton, Dennis (2003) “Wage and Benefits Report Authored by UCLA's Institute of Industrial Relations,” Desert Sun. 12 July, p. 1.Google Scholar
Ceci, Stephen J., et al. (1985) “Human Subjects Review, Personal Values, and the Regulation of Social Science Research,” 40 American Psychologist 9941002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citro, Constance F., et al. (2003) Protecting Participants and Facilitating Social and Behavioral Sciences Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey (2006). “OHRP and Oral History,” http://hrpp.blogspot.com/2006/11/ohrp-and-oral-history.html (accessed 20 May 2007).Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth Culp (1969) Discretionary Justice. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Dreger, Alice (forthcoming) “The Controversy Surrounding ‘The Man Who Would Be Queen’: A Case History of the Politics of Science, Identity and Sex in the Internet Age,” Archives of Sexual Behavior.Google Scholar
Emerson, Robert M., & Pollner, Melvin (1991) “Difference and Dialogue: Members' Readings of Ethnographic Texts,” in Holstein, J. & Miller, G., eds., Perspectives On Social Problems, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. (1979) The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. (2007) “Presidential Address: Legality, Social Research, and the Challenge of Institutional Review Boards,” 41 Law & Society Rev. 757–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. (1969) The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gunsalus, Kristina C., et al. (2003) “Human Subject Regulations: Whom Are We Protecting From What, and Why? Counteracting IRB ‘Mission Creep,’http://www.law.uiuc.edu/conferences/whitepaper/(accessed 2 June 2007)Google Scholar
Hall, Annie (2005) “Ohio State U. Takes Closer Look at Graduate Student's Dissertation,” The Lantern. 23 June, p. 1.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip (2005) “The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards,” Supreme Court Rev. 2004: 271354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Kendra (2003) “Going Deep,” 20 Black Issues in Higher Education, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0DXK (accessed 2 June 2007).Google Scholar
Hart, Herbert L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Institutional Review Blog (2007). http://institutionalreviewblog.blogspot.com/ (accessed 27 April 2007).Google Scholar
Jacobs, Samuel P. (2007) “Harvard Researcher Tangles with University Ethics,” Harvard Crimson. 30 March, p. 1.Google Scholar
Malone, Ruth E., et al. (2006) “‘It's Like Tuskegee in Reverse’: A Case Study of Ethical Tensions in IRB Review of Community Participatory Research,” 96 American J. of Public Health 1914–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Charles R. (1984) “The IRB and Social and Behavioral Research,” in Sieber, J. E., ed., NIH Readings on the Protection of Human Subjects in Behavioral and Social Science Research. Frederick, MD: University Publications of America.Google Scholar
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979) Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Pager, Devah (2003) “The Mark of a Criminal Record,” 108 American J. of Sociology 937–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plattner, Stuart (2003) “Human Subjects Protection and Cultural Anthropology,” 76 Anthropological Q. 287–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sahagun, Louis (2003) “Panel Rejects Study of Casino Benefits,” Los Angeles Times. 24 Aug., Metro Sec., p. 1.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Richard D., & Skolnick, Jerome H. (1962) “Two Studies of Legal Stigma,” 10 Social Problems 133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selznick, Philip (1949) TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip, et al. (1980) Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard A. (2006) “Protecting Human Subjects and Preserving Academic Freedom: Prospects at the University of Chicago,” 33 American Ethnologist 507–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieber, Joan E., et al. (2002) “How (Not) to Regulate Social and Behavioral Research,” 15 Professional Ethics Report 14.Google Scholar
Skolnick, Jerome H. (1966) Justice without Trial. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Stark, Laura (2006). “Morality in Science: How Research Is Evaluated in the Age of Human Subjects Regulation.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Princeton University.Google Scholar
University of Pennsylvania (2002) “Report of the Working Group on Human Subjects Research in the SocioBehavioral Sciences,” 49 University Almanac 68.Google Scholar