Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T21:21:54.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dworkin, Hart, and the Problem of Theoretical Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Michael Mandel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The following article analyzes the dispute between legal philosophers Ronald Dworkin and H.L.A. Hart over the nature of legal rights. The author argues that central to this dispute is a pervasive methodological problem of social theory, the “problem of theoretical perspective.” He makes use of a distinction between “internal” and “external” perspectives to defend what he conceives to be Hart's more fully social approach to the conceptualization of legal rights.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , Fall 1979 , pp. 57 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to Harry Glasbeek, Reuben Hasson, Allan Hutchinson and the editors of the Law and Society Review for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

References

DWORKIN, R.M. (1963) “Judicial Discretion,” 60 Journal of Philosophy 624.Google Scholar
DWORKIN, R.M. (1967) “The Model of Rules,” 35 University of Chicago Law Review 14.Google Scholar
DWORKIN, R.M. (1975) “Hard Cases,” 88 Harvard Law Review 1057.Google Scholar
DWORKIN, R.M. (1977a) “No Right Answer,” in Hacker, P.M.S. and Raz, J. (eds.), Law, Morality, and Society: Essays in Honour of H.L.A. Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1977b) “No Right Answer,” 53 New York University Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Raz, J.(1977c) “Seven Critics,” 11 Georgia Law Review 1201.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1977d) Taking Rights Seriously. London: Gerald Duckworth.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1977e) “Why Bakke Has No Case,” 24 (18) New York Review of Books 11.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1978a) “The Bakke Decision: Did it Decide Anything?” 25 (13) New York Review of Books 20.Google Scholar
Raz, J. (1978b) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
EHRENZWEIG, Albert A. (1971) Psychoanalytic Jurisprudence. Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
FINNIS, J.M. (1973) “Revolutions and the Continuity of Law,” in Simpson, A.W.B. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (second series). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
HART, H.L.A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
MACKIE, J.L. (1977) Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
MacPHERSON, C.B. (1978) Property, Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
MARX, Karl (1859) Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, reprinted in Bottomore, T.B. (trans.) and Rubel, M. (ed.) (1964), Selected Writings in Sociology and Social Philosophy. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
MUNZER, Stephen R. (1977) “Right Answers, Preexisting Rights, and Fairness,” 11 Georgia Law Review 1055.Google Scholar
RAZ, J. (1973) “On the Functions of Law,” in Simpson, A.W.B. (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (second series). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
SOPER, E. Philip (1977) “Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge: The Hart/Dworkin Dispute,” 75 Michigan Law Review 473.Google Scholar
SPARSHOTT, F.E. (1972) Looking for Philosophy. London: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
STONE, Julius (1964) Legal Systems and Lawyers' Reasonings. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
UNGER, Roberto M. (1976) Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
WHITELEY, C.H. (1969) What Philosophy is About. Inaugural Lecture, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England.Google Scholar
WISDOM, J.O. (1975) Philosophy and Its Place in Our Culture. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (98 S. Ct. 2733, 1978a).Google Scholar
* These articles are included in Taking Rights Seriously, 1977.Google Scholar
** This article is included in the 1977 paperback edition only, under the title “A Reply to Critics.”.Google Scholar