Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-7nlkj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T00:28:23.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why the Japanese Law School System Was Established: Co‐optation as a Defensive Tactic in the Face of Global Pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Mayumi Saegusa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the face of pressures to expand the rule of law, in 2004, Japan introduced a new law school system in order to produce more and better qualified lawyers. This article explains why the new law school system solution was selected from among other alternatives such as reforming the national bar exam, abolishing mandatory legal training, reforming existing legal education, or redefining the jurisdiction of lawyers. I argue that the law school system was adopted because the legal establishment co‐opted pro‐law school scholars and other reformists. Although American‐style law schools have been introduced in Japan, power has not yet shifted entirely from the legal establishment to the pro‐law school scholars; while the legal establishment may no longer have absolute control of the Japanese judicial arena, it remains powerful because it successfully co‐opted pro‐American elites into judicial reform. By analyzing the case of the Japanese law school system, this article indicates that transplants of global institutions may often be more symbolic than practical due to co‐optation tactics used by powerful local actors.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , Spring 2009 , pp. 365 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Administrative Reform Committee [Gyosei Kaikaku Iinnkai]. 1995. Gyosei Kaikaku Iinkai Ikensho: Kisei‐kanwa No Suishin Ni Kansuru Ikensho, hikari kagayaku kuni wo mezashite [Administrative Reform Committee's recommendation: the first comments on promoting regulatory reform]. http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/kaikaku.html#2‐11 (Web site no longer available).Google Scholar
Bremner, Brian, Thornton, Emily, with Kunii, Irene M. 1999. Mitsubishi: A Fall of Keiretsu. BusinessWeek, March 15. http://www.businessweek.com/1999/99_11/b3620009.htm (accessed November 17, 2008.Google Scholar
Campbell, John L., and Pedersen, Ove K., eds. 2001. The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48:147–60.Google Scholar
Endo, Naoya. 2000. Law School Kyoikuron [Law school education] . Tokyo: Shinzansha.Google Scholar
Expert Advisory Committee on Internationalization [Kokusaika Kentokai]. 20022004. Headquarters of Justice System Reform Promotion [Shiho Seido Kaikaku Suishin Honbu]. Minutes of the 1st‐18th sessions. http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/sihou/kentoukai/08kokusaika.html (accessed November 18, 2008.Google Scholar
Expert Advisory Committee on the Legal Training System [Hoso Yosei Kentokai]. 20022004. Headquarters of Justice System Reform Promotion [Shiho Seido Kaikaku Suishin Honbu]. Minutes of the 1st‐24th sessions. http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/sihou/kentoukai/09yousei.html (accessed November 18, 2008 Google Scholar
Foote, Daniel H. 2003. Japanese Justice System Reform in Comparative Perspective. Hoshakaigaku 58:204–34.Google Scholar
Foote, Daniel H. 2005. Forces Driving and Shaping Legal Training Reform in Japan. Australian Journal of Asian Law 7 (3): 215–40.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion. 2006. The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics. American Journal of Sociology 112 (1): 145–94.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion, and Savelsberg, Joachim J., eds. 2006. Introduction: Global Processes, National Institutions, Local Bricolage: Shaping Law in an Era of Globalization. Special issue, Law & Social Inquiry 31 (3): 513–19.Google Scholar
Fourcade‐Gourinchas, Marion, and Babb, Sarah L. 2002. The Rebirth of the Liberal Creed: Paths to Neoliberalism in Four Countries. American Journal of Sociology 103:553–79.Google Scholar
Frank, David J., and Meyer, John W. 2002. The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Post‐War Period. Sociological Theory 20:86–105.Google Scholar
Furukawa, Teijiro. 2004. Shiho Seido Kaikaku ni Tsuite [About judicial system reform]. Shiho Seido Chosa Shitsuho [Research on Judicial System] 3:2–24.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Osinsky, Pavel. 2006. Globalization of Law. Annual Review Sociology 33:447–70.Google Scholar
Japan Association of Corporate Executives [Keizai Doyukai]. 1994. Gendai Nihon no Byori to Shoho [Remedies for current Japan's pathology] . Tokyo: Keizai Doyukai.Google Scholar
Japan Federation of Bar Associations [Nihon Bengoshi Rengokai]. 2000. Nichibenren Rinji Soukai Ketsugian Kaketsu [The ad hoc meeting's resolution is passed]. http://www.nichibenren.or.jp/jp/katsudo/syuppan/shinbun/2000/322_1.html (Web site no longer available).Google Scholar
Japan Federation of Bar Associations [Nihon Bengoshi Rengokai]. 2001. Nihongata Law School Wo Dou Tsukurunoka [How we can make Japanese‐style law schools] . Tokyo: Gendai Jinbunsha.Google Scholar
Japan Federation of Bar Associations [Nihon Bengoshi Rengokai]. 2006. Kigyo, Kankocho, Chihojichitai Ankeito no Bunseki Kekka [Survey results of corporations, ministries, and local goverments' interests in hiring in‐house lawyers]. http://www.nichibenren.or.jp/ja/committee/list/data/enquete_data3.pdf (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Japan Federation of Economic Organizations [Nihon keizai Dantai Rengokai]. 1998. Shiho Seido Kaikaku Ni Tsuiteno Iken [Comments on judicial reform] . Tokyo: Keidanren.Google Scholar
Japan Times. 2008. Law Schools Come Under Friendly Fire. January 29. http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi‐bin/fl20080129zg.html (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Justice System Reform Council [Shiho Seido Kaikaku Shingikai]. 19992001. Minutes of the 1–63rd sessions. http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/sihouseido/gijiroku‐dex.html (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Justice System Reform Council [Shiho Seido Kaikaku Shingikai]. 2001. Shiho seido kaikaku shingikai ikensho—21seiki no nihon wo kaeru shiho seido [Recommendations of the Justice System Reform Council: for a justice system to support Japan in the 21st century]. http://www.kantei.go.jp/foreign/policy/sihou/singikai/990612_e.html (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Kakiuchi, Shusuke, Machimura, Yasutaka, Matsumura, Yuji, and Yamamoto, Kazuhiko. 2002. France Bengoshi‐Shoku no Gyomu to Shunyu ni Kansuru Genjyo [Current situation of lawyers' services and remuneration]. In Ho to Jitsumu [Law and Practice] , ed. Japan Law Foundation. Tokyo: Shoji Houmu.Google Scholar
Kawamura, Akira. 1997. WTO Taiseika ni Okeru Bengoshigyo no Houteki Wakugumi [Legal service systems under WTO]. In Atarashii Seiki Heno Bengoshizo [Lawyers in a New Century] , ed. Japan Federation of Bar Associations, 82–99. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Sibbitt, Eric C. 2002. The Americanization of Japanese Law. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 269:4–12.Google Scholar
Liberal Democratic Party [Jiyu Minshuto], Special Committee on Judicial System Reform [Shiho Seido Tokubetsu Chosakai]. 1997. Shiho Seido Kaikaku no Kihonteki na Hoshin [Basic policies for judicial system reform]. http://www.yasuoka.org/doc_seisaku/siho/01.htm (accessed November 18, 2008.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida. 2006. Beyond Global Convergence: Conflicts of Legitimacy in a Chinese Lower Court. Law & Social Inquiry 31 (1): 76–108.Google Scholar
Menkhaus, Heinrich. 2004. Doitsu Ni okeru 2002nen no Houso Yousei Kaisei ni tsuite [German's 2002 legal education reform]. Houritsu Jiho [Legal Times] 76 (5): 65–71.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2003. From Law and Colonialism to Law and Globalization. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (2): 569–90.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W. 2001. Globalization, National Culture, and the Future of the World Polity. Wei Lun Lecture at Chinese University of Hong Kong, November 28, in Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83:340–63.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 1998. Shiho Shiken Dainiji Shiken Daigakubetsu Goukakusha Ichiranhyou [The bar exam results by universities]. http://www.moj.go.jp/PRESS/981029/1920‐s3.html (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 1999. Shiho Shiken Dainiji Shiken Daigakubetsu Goukakusha Ichiranhyou [The bar exam results by universities]. http://www.moj.go.jp/PRESS/991029/1920‐s3.html (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2000. Shiho Shiken Dainiji Shiken Daigakubetsu Goukakusha Ichiranhyou [The bar exam results by universities]. http://www.moj.go.jp/PRESS/001110/11012000‐103.html (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2001. Shiho Shiken Dainiji Shiken Daigakubetsu Goukakusha Ichiranhyou [The bar exam results by universities]. http://www.moj.go.jp/PRESS/011109/13‐2univ.html (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2002. Shiho Shiken Dainiji Shiken Daigakubetsu Goukakusha Ichiranhyou [The bar exam results by universities]. http://www.moj.go.jp/PRESS/021113/14‐2univ.html (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2003. Shiho Shiken Dainiji Shiken Daigakubetsu Goukakusha Ichiranhyou [The bar exam results by universities]. http://www.moj.go.jp/PRESS/031112‐1/15‐2univ.html (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2005. Heiko Jisshi Kikanchu no Shinkyu Shiho Shiken Goukakushasuu ni Tsuite [About the allocation of the new and existing bar exam]. http://www.moj.go.jp/SHINGI/SHIHOU/050228‐1‐1.html (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 1986. Legal Departments of Japanese Corporations in the United States: A Study on Organizational Adaptation to Multiple Environments. Kobe University Law Review 20:99–162.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 2000. Legal Education and the Reproduction of the Elite in Japan. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 1:1–32.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 2001. The Politics of Judicial Reform in Japan: The Rule of Law at Last? Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 2:89–121.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo. 2002. Education and Training of Lawyers in Japan: A Critical Analysis. South Texas Law Review 43:491–98.Google Scholar
Miyazawa, Setsuo, Chan, Kay‐Wah, and Lee, Ilhyung. 2008. The Reform of Legal Education in East Asia. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 4:333–60.Google Scholar
Nagashima, Yasuharu, and Zaloom, E. Anthony. 2007. The Rise of the Large Japanese Business Law Firm and its Prospects for the Future. In Law in Japan: A Turning Point, ed. Foote, Daniel, 135–52. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Omura, Atsushi. 2001. Kihon Minpou I [Basic civil law I] . Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
Sato, Koji. 2000. Saishu Iken ni Komerareta Imi [Explanation of the recommendation of the Justice System Reform Council]. In Series shiho kaikaku I [Series judicial reform] , ed. Jiho, Horitsu and Henshubu, Hogaku Seminar, 1–10. Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha.Google Scholar
Sato, Koji, Takeshita, Morio, and Inouye, Masahito. 2002. Shiho seido kaikaku [Judicial system reform] . Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
Schofer, Evan. 2003. The Global Institutionalization of Geological Science, 1800 to 1990. American Sociological Review 68 (5): 730–60.Google Scholar
Sekioka, Hideyuki. 2004. Kyohi Dekinai Nihon [Japan, a country that cannot resist] . Tokyo: Bunshun Shinsho.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1949. TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1993. The Globalization of Law. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 1:37–64.Google Scholar
Forum, Shiho Kaikaku. 2000. Shiho Kaikaku no Zentei (daiichiji teigen) [Premises of judicial reform]. http://www.nasu‐u.ac.jp/kume/pdf/shihou0421.pdf (Web site no longer available).Google Scholar
Suami, Takao. 2003. Houka Daigakuin Koso no Genjyo to Kadai [Current situations and issues around the law school proposal]. Geppo Shiho Shoshi [Monthly Judicial Scriveners 376:60–65.Google Scholar
Supreme Court. 2002. Atarashii Shiho Shushu no Naiyo to ni tsuite [About the new apprenticeship training]. http://www.kantei.go.jp/jp/singi/sihou/kentoukai/yousei/dai12/12siryou_s.pdf (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar
Suzuki, Yoshio. 1995. Nihon No Shiho Kokoga Mondai [Problems of Japan's justice system] . Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shinbunsha.Google Scholar
Tamura, Jiro. 2003. Shiho Seido Kaikaku to Houka Daigakuin [Judicial reform and law schools] . Tokyo: Nihon Hyoronsha.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Shigeaki. 1999a. Nihon Gata Houka Daigakuin Koso ni tsuite [Japanese law school proposal]. Jiyu to Seigi [Freedom and Justice] 50:14–25.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Shigeaki. 1999b. Hoso Yosei Seido Kaikaku to Daigaku no Hougaku Kyoiku [Legal training system reform and undergraduate education]. In Kyoto Daigaku Hougakubu Souritsu Hyakushunen Kinen Ronbunshu. Vol. 1 [100th anniversary of faculty of law, Kyoto University. Vol. I], 53–89. Tokyo: Yuhikaku.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Chihara, Kuzuno, Hiroyuki, Wada, Shinichi, and Ueda, Ken. 2000. Shiryo Kaisetsu: Shiho Seido Kaikaku no Keii to Toutatsuten [Expository document: processes and accomplishment of justice system reform]. Series shiho kaikaku I [Special series, Judicial Reform I] 2000:10–45.Google Scholar
Westney, D. Elearnor. 1987. Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer of Western Organizational Patterns to Meiji Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Yanagida, Yukio. 1998a. Nihon no Atarashi Hoso Yosei Seido I [Japan's new legal training system I]. Jurist 1127:111–18.Google Scholar
Yanagida, Yukio. 1998b. Nihon No Atarashi Hoso Yosei Seido II [Japan's new legal training system II]. Jurist 1128:65–70.Google Scholar
Yomiuri Shinbun. 2008. Bengoshi kyuzou de yureru housoukai [A rapid increase in the bar shakes the legal profession]. February 5. http://job.yomiuri.co.jp/news/jo_ne_08020504.cfm (accessed November 18, 2008).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Foreign Lawyers Law, Law No. 128 of 2003.Google Scholar
Practicing Attorney Law (Article 72, Prohibition of the practice of law by non‐lawyers), Law No. 205 of 1949.Google Scholar