Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:35:28.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Still Hazy after All These Years

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Section Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1997 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Gregory S. 1996. Ten Years of Takings. Journal of Legal Education 46: 586–95.Google Scholar
Black's Law Dictionary. 1990. 6th ed. St. Paul: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Blume, Lawrence E., and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. 1984. Compensation for Takings: An Economic Analysis. California Law Review 72: 569628.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, and Melamed., A. Douglas 1972. Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review 85: 10891128.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald A. 1960. The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 144.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D. 1985. Unity in Tort, Contract, and Property: The Model of Precaution. California Law Review 73: 151.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert D., and Ulen, Thomas S. 1997. Law and Economics. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1986. Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution among Neighbors in Shasta County. Stanford Law Review 38: 623–87.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 1996. Takings Legislation: A Comment. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 20: 7584.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1991. Another Such Victory: Constitutional Theory and Practice in a World Where Courts Are No Different from Legislatures. Virginia Law Review 77: 833–79.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1985. Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplow, Louis. 1986. An Economic Analysis of Legal Transitions. Harvard Law Review 99: 509617.Google Scholar
Korobkin, Russell. 1995. Policymaking and the Offer/Asking Price Gap: Toward a Theory of Efficient Entitlement Allocation. Stanford Law Review 46: 663708.Google Scholar
Levmore, Saul. 1990. Just Compensation and Just Politics. Connecticut Law Review 22: 285322.Google Scholar
Merrill, Thomas. 1986. The Economics of Public Use. Cornell Law Review 72: 61116.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1967. Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of “Just Compensation” Law. Harvard Law Review 80: 11651258.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1987. Takings, 1987. Columbia Law Review 88: 16001629.Google Scholar
Rachlinski, Jeffrey. 1997. Gains, Losses, and the Psychology of Litigation. Southern Califomia Law Review 70: 113–85.Google Scholar
Rose, Carol M. 1984. Mohan Reconsidered: Why the Takings Issue Is Still a Muddle. Southern California Law Review 57: 561–99.Google Scholar
Rubinfield, Jed. 1993. Yak Law Journal 102: 10771163.Google Scholar
Sax, Joseph. 1964. Takings and the Police Power. Yale Law Journal 74: 3676.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 1997. Analysis of Law. Working paper no. 46 (2d ser.), John M. Olin Progra. In Law and Economics, University of Chicago.Google Scholar