Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T09:38:35.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social Movements and the Politics of Bureaucratic Rights Enforcement: Insights from the Allocation of Disability Rights in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Anne Revillard
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While research on legal mobilization shows how social movements contribute to the definition and implementation of rights, it remains excessively centered on litigation to the detriment of administrative rights enforcement. This article maps out how street-level bureaucracies impact rights enforcement by distinguishing between allocation, access, and process, and analyzes how social movements intervene in these three aspects. It then focuses on allocation, using the case of French disability policy to analyze the forms of advocacy deployed by movement actors who take part in the rights allocation process at the local level. The article argues that conformity to institutional norms derives not so much from a pressure to conform as from the knowledge and experience of the limited means locally available to make rights effective. Further, it shows how advocacy is reframed from the defense of individual claims to a role of scrutiny and control of the bureaucratic allocation of rights.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , Spring 2017 , pp. 450 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Act‐Up. 2015. Séropos: LA MDPH du Lot vous préfère mortEs. http://www.actupparis.org/spip.php?page=portfolio&id_document=7940 (accessed June 15, 2015).Google Scholar
Anagnostou, Dia, ed. 2014. Rights and Courts in Pursuit of Social Change. Legal Mobilisation in the Multi‐Level European System. Onati International Series in Law and Society. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Anagnostou, Dia, and Millns, Susan. 2013. Gender Equality, Legal Mobilization, and Feminism in a Multilevel European System. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 28 (2): 115–31.Google Scholar
Astier, Isabelle. 2000. Droit À L'emploi et Magistratures Sociales#8239;: Vers Une Politique Des Situations. Droit et Société 44/45:143–55.Google Scholar
Astier, Isabelle, and Duvoux, Nicolas. 2006. La Société Biographique: Une Injonction À Vivre Dignement. Paris: L'Harmattan/Logiques sociales.Google Scholar
Azéma, Bernard. 1999. La Personne Handicapée, L'associatif et Le Politique: Esquisse D'une Géopolitique Du Handicap En France. Hérodote 92:161–86.Google Scholar
Bagenstos, Samuel R. 2009. Law and the Contradictions of the Disability Rights Movement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Barclay, Scott, Bernstein, Mary, and Marshall, Anna‐Maria. 2009. Queer Mobilizations. LGBT Activists Confront the Law. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Barral, Catherine. 2007. Disabled Persons' Associations in France. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 9 (3–4): 214–36.Google Scholar
Barral, Catherine, Paterson, Florence, Stiker, Henri‐Jacques, and Chauvière, Michel. 2000. L'institution Du Handicap. Le Rôle Des Associations, XIXème‐XXème Siècles. Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar
Baudot, Pierre‐Yves, Duvoux, Nicolas, Lejeune, Aude, Perrier, Gwenaëlle, and Revillard, Anne. 2013. Les MDPH#8239;: Un Guichet Unique À Entrées Multiples. Paris: MiRe‐DREES/CNSA.Google Scholar
Baudot, Pierre‐Yves, and Revillard, Anne. 2014a. L'autonomie de L’équilibriste. Contribution À Une Sociologie de La Production Institutionnelle Des Droits. Gouvernement et Action Publique 3 (4): 83–113.Google Scholar
Baudot, Pierre‐Yves, and Revillard, Anne. 2014b. Entre Mobilisations et Institutions#8239;: Les Politiques Des Droits Dans L'action Publique. Gouvernement et Action Publique 3 (4): 9–33.Google Scholar
Baudot, Pierre‐Yves, and Revillard, Anne. 2015. L'Etat Des Droits. Politique Des Droits et Pratiques Des Institutions. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po/Gouvernances.Google Scholar
Baudot, Pierre‐Yves, and Revillard, Anne. Forthcoming. Faire Campagne sans Prendre Parti#8239;: Opportunités et Contraintes Des Campagnes Électorales Pour Les Associations de Personnes Handicapées. In Le lobbying électoral. Groupes en campagne dans l'élection présidentielle de 2012, ed. Guillaume Courty and Julie Gervais. Lille: Presses du Septentrion/Espaces politiques.Google Scholar
Bereni, Laure. 2015. La Bataille de La Parité. Mobilisations Pour La Féminisation Du Pouvoir. Paris: Economica/Etudes politiques.Google Scholar
Bertrand, Louis, Caradec, Vincent, and Eideliman, Jean‐Sébastien. 2011. Saisir Les Personnes. Le Fonctionnement Des Commissions Dans L'aide Au Logement et Aux Personnes Handicapées. In Reconfigurations de l'Etat Social En Pratique, ed. Bureau, Marie‐Christine and Sainsaulieu, Ivan, 153–66. Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Universitaire du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Borelle, Céline. 2015. Qualifier Des Cas, Produire Concrètement Des Droits. Le Cas Du Handicap. In L'Etat Des Droits. Politique Des Droits et Pratiques Des Institutions, ed. Baudot, Pierre‐Yves and Revillard, Anne, 211–54. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po/Gouvernances.Google Scholar
Bureau, Marie‐Christine, and Rist, Barbara. 2011. Professionnels, Associatifs et Personnes Handicapées Réunis Autour de La Table: Un Droit En Train de Se Faire? In Reconfigurations de l'Etat Social En Pratique, ed. Bureau, Marie‐Christine and Sainsaulieu, Ivan, 119–32. Villeneuve d'Ascq: Presses Universitaire du Septentrion.Google Scholar
Bureau, Marie‐Christine, and Rist, Barbara. 2013. Questions de Santé et Questions de Travail#8239;: Quelles Conciliations Dans Les Commissions D'attribution Des Droits Aux Personnes Handicapées? Sociologies Pratiques 26:85–99.Google Scholar
Burke, Thomas F. 2002. Lawyers, Lawsuits, and Legal Rights. The Battle Over Litigation in American Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1991. Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology 96 (5): 1201–25.Google Scholar
Buton, François. 2009. L'administration Des Faveurs: L’État, Les Sourds et Les Aveugles (1789–1885). Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Campbell, Jane, and Oliver, Mike. 1996. Disability Politics: Understanding Our Past, Changing Our Future. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chappe, Vincent‐Arnaud. 2011. Le Cadrage Juridique, Une Ressource Politique? La Création de La HALDE Comme Solution Au Problème de L'effectivité Des Normes Anti‐Discrimination. (1998–2005). Politix 94:107–30.Google Scholar
Charlton, James I. 1998. Nothing About Us Without Us—Disability Oppression and Empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cova, Anne. 2000. Généalogie D'une Conquête#8239;: Maternité et Droits Des Femmes En France, Fin XIXe‐XXe Siècles. Travail, Genre et Société 3:139–59.Google Scholar
de Blic, Damien. 2008. De La Fédération Des Mutilés Du Travail À La Fédération Nationale Des Accidentés Du Travail et Des Handicapés. Une Longue Mobilisation Pour Une “Juste et Légitime Réparation” Des Accidents Du Travail et Des Maladies Professionnelles. Revue Française des Affaires Sociales 2–3:119–40.Google Scholar
Dubois, Vincent. 2010. The Bureaucrat and the Poor. Encounters in French Welfare Offices. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. 1990. Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace. American Journal of Sociology 95 (6): 1401–40.Google Scholar
Engel, David M., and Munger, Frank W. 2003. Rights of Inclusion. Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution#8239;: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 2009. Making Rights Real. Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Erkulwater, Jennifer. 2006. Disability Rights and the American Social Safety Net. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan S. 1998. The Common Place of Law#8239;: Stories from Everyday Life. Language and Legal Discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, W., Abel, R. L., and Sarat, A. 1980. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming. Law & Society Review 15:631–54.Google Scholar
Fischer, Nicolas. 2009. Une frontière “négociée”. L'assistance juridique associative aux étrangers placés en rétention administrative. Politix 87 (3): 71–92.Google Scholar
Fleury‐Steiner, Benjamin, and Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2006a. Introduction. A Constitutive Perspective of Rights. In The New Civil Rights Research. A Constitutive Approach, 1–14. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fleury‐Steiner, Benjamin, and Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2006b. The New Civil Rights Research: A Constitutive Approach. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead#8239;: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95–160.Google Scholar
Heyer, Katharina. 2002. The ADA on the Road: Disability Rights in Germany. Law & Social Inquiry 27 (4): 723–63.Google Scholar
Heyer, Katharina. 2005. Rights or Quotas? The ADA as a Model for Disability Rights. In Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research, ed. Nielsen, Laura Beth and Nelson, Robert L., 237–57. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Israël, Liora. 2009. L'arme Du Droit. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po/Contester.Google Scholar
Jakšić, Milena. 2013. Le Mérite et Le Besoin Critères de Justice et Contraintes Institutionnelles Des Associations D'aide Aux Victimes de La Traite. Terrains & Travaux 22:201–16.Google Scholar
James, Deborah, and Killick, Evan. 2012. Empathy and Expertise: Case Workers and Immigration/Asylum Applicants in London. Law & Social Inquiry 37 (2): 430–55.Google Scholar
Jenson, Jane. 1989. Paradigms and Political Discourse: Protective Legislation in France and the United States Before 1914. Canadian Journal of Political Science 22 (2): 235–58.Google Scholar
Jones, Lynn, and Marshall, Anna‐Maria. 2013. Legal Actors and Legal Strategies: Structure and Agency in Strategic Choice. Paper presented at the 2013 Law and Society Association Meeting, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Kelemen, R. Daniel, and Vanhala, Lisa. 2010. The Shift to the Rights Model of Disability in the EU and Canada. Regional and Federal Studies 20 (1): 1–18.Google Scholar
King, Brayden G., Cornwall, Marie, and Dahlin, Eric C. 2005. Winning Woman Suffrage One Step at a Time: Social Movements and the Logic of the Legislative Process. Social Forces 83 (3): 1211–34.Google Scholar
Lafore, Robert. 2010. Le Rôle Des Associations Dans La Mise En Oeuvre Des Politiques D'action Sociale. Informations Sociales 162:64–71.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Sandra. 2006 . To Lead with Law: Reassessing the Role of Legal Advocacy Organizations in Social Movements. In Cause Lawyers and Social Movements, ed. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stuart A, 145–63. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Sandra. 2008. “What Rights?” The Construction of Political Claims to American Health Care Entitlements. Law & Society Review 42 (3): 551–89.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Sandra. 2014. Caring for Our Own: Why There is No Political Demand for New American Social Welfare Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lipsky, Michael. 1980. Street‐Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lovell, George. 2012. This is Not Civil Rights: Discovering Rights Talk in 1939 America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Manfredi, Christopher P. 2004. Feminist Activism in the Supreme Court: Legal Mobilization and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna‐Maria. 2003. Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment. Law & Social Inquiry 28:659–89.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna‐Maria. 2005. Confronting Sexual Harassment: The Law and Politics of Everyday Life. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna‐Maria, and Barclay, Scott. 2003. In Their Own Words: How Ordinary People Construct the Legal World. Law & Social Inquiry 28 (3): 617–28.Google Scholar
Maynard‐Moody, Steven, and Musheno, Michael. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors. Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1991 . Legal Mobilization and Social Reform Movements#8239;: Notes on Theory and its Application. In Studies in Law, Politics & Society 11, ed. McCann, Michael W, 225–54. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work#8239;: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Language and Legal Discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 2004. Law and Social Movements. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. Sarat, Austin, 506–22. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 2006a. Introduction (Law and Social Movements). In Law and Social Movements, ed. McCann, Michael, xi–xxvi. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 2006b. Law and Social Movements. The International Library of Essays in Law and Society. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 2014. The Unbearable Lightness of Rights: On Sociolegal Inquiry in the Global Era. Law & Society Review 48 (2): 245–73.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working‐Class Americans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence#8239;: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2014. Inequality and Rights: Commentary on Michael Mc Cann's “The Unbearable Lightness of Rights.” Law & Society Review 48 (2): 285–95.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha. 1987. Interpreting Rights: An Essay for Robert Cover. Yale Law Journal 96 (8): 1860–1915.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2014. Of Rights and Favors. Law & Society Review 48 (2): 275–84.Google Scholar
Ni pauvre ni soumis [Neither Poor nor Submissive]. 2008. Naissance du mouvement [Birth of the Movement]. http://www.nipauvrenisoumis.org/f._histoire/(accessed January 3, 2016).Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2004. The Work of Rights and the Work Rights Do: A Critical Empirical Approach. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, ed. Sarat, Austin, 63–79. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Non au report collective (2014) Non au report de 2015. http://nonaureport.tumblr.com/(accessed January 3, 2016).Google Scholar
O'Brien, Ruth. 2001. Crippled Justice. The History of Modern Disability Policy in the Workplace. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Paterson, Florence, Stiker, Henri‐Jacques, Chauvière, Michel, and Barral, Catherine. 2000. L'institution Du Handicap . Le Rôle Des Associations. Rennes: PUR.Google Scholar
Pedriana, Nicholas. 2006. From Protective to Equal Treatment#8239;: Legal Framing Processes and Transformation of the Women's Movement in the 1960s. American Journal of Sociology 111 (6): 1718–61.Google Scholar
Perrier, Gwenaëlle. 2013. “Mettre L'usager Au Cœur Du Dispositif”? Regards Croisés Sur Quatre Maisons Départementales Des Personnes Handicapées. Terrains & Travaux 23:93–112.Google Scholar
Rao, Gautham. 2012. Administering Entitlement: Governance, Public Health Care, and the Early American State. Law & Social Inquiry 37 (3): 627–56.Google Scholar
Revillard, Anne, Baudot, Pierre‐Yves, Chappe, Vincent‐Arnaud, and Ribémont, Thomas. 2011. La Fabrique D'une Légalité Administrative. Sociologie Du Médiateur de La République. Paris: Mission de recherche Droit et Justice Report.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin. 1990. “… The Law Is All Over”: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 2 (2): 343–79.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scotch, Richard K. 2001. From Good Will to Civil Rights: Transforming Federal Disability Policy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Skrentny, John David. 2002. The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., Rochford, E. Burke, Worden, Steven, and Benford, Robert D. 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review 51 (4): 464–81.Google Scholar
Spire, Alexis. 2008. Accueillir Ou Reconduire. Enquête Sur Les Guichets de L'immigration. Paris: Seuil/Liber.Google Scholar
Stapleton, David C., O'Day, Bonnie L., Livermore, Gina A., and Imparato, Andrew J. 2006. Dismantling the Poverty Trap: Disability Policy for the Twenty‐First Century. Milbank Quarterly 84 (4): 701–32.Google Scholar
Stiker, Henri‐Jacques. 2009. Les Métamorphoses Du Handicap de 1970 À Nos Jours: Soi‐Même, Avec Les Autres. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.Google Scholar
Stryker, Robin. 2007. Half Empty, Half Full or Neither? Law, Inequality and Social Change. Annual Review of Law & Social Science 3:69–97.Google Scholar
Switzer, Jacqueline Vaughn. 2003. Disabled Rights: American Disability Policy and the Fight for Equality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2009. Disability Rights Activists in the Supreme Court of Canada: Legal Mobilization Theory and Accommodating Social Movements. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 981–1002.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2011. Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weill, Pierre‐Edouard. 2014. Quand Les Associations Font Office de Street‐Level Bureaucracy. Le Travail Quotidien En Faveur de L'accès Au Droit Au Logement Opposable. Sociologie Du Travail 56 (3): 298–319.Google Scholar
Weller, Jean‐Marc. 1999. L'Etat Au Guichet. Sociologie Cognitive Du Travail et Modernisation Administrative Des Services Publics. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.Google Scholar
Weller, Jean‐Marc. 2000. Droit de La Sécurité Sociale et Réalité de L'organisation, L'exemple de La Branche Famille. Droit et Société 44:45–91.Google Scholar
Winance, Myriam, Ville, Isabelle, and Ravaud, Jean‐François. 2007. Disability Policies in France: Changes and Tensions Between the Category‐Based, Universalist and Personalized Approaches. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 9 (3–4):160–81.Google Scholar
Décret n° 2005‐1589 du 19 décembre 2005 relatif à la commission des droits et de l'autonomie des personnes handicapées [Decree on the Disabled Persons' Rights and Autonomy Committee, 19 December 2005].Google Scholar
Loi n° 75‐534 du 30 juin 1975 d'orientation en faveur des personnes handicapées [Framework Law in Favor of Disabled Persons, 30 June 1975].Google Scholar
Loi n° 2005‐102 du 11 février 2005 pour l’égalité des droits et des chances, la participation et la citoyenneté des personnes handicapées [Law on the Equal Rights and Opportunities, the Participation and the Citizenship of Disabled Persons, 11 February 2005.]Google Scholar
Loi n° 2015‐988 du 5 août 2015 ratifiant l'ordonnance n° 2014‐1090 du 26 septembre 2014 relative à la mise en accessibilité des établissements recevant du public, des transports publics, des bâtiments d'habitation et de la voirie pour les personnes handicapées et visant à favoriser l'accès au service civique pour les jeunes en situation de handicap [Law Ratifying the 26/09/2014 Ordinance and Favoring Access to Civic Service for Disabled Youths, 5 August 2015].Google Scholar
Ordonnance n° 2014‐1090 du 26 septembre 2014 relative à la mise en accessibilité des établissements recevant du public, des transports publics, des bâtiments d'habitation et de la voirie pour les personnes handicapées [Ordinance on the Accessibility of Public Buildings and Transportation, Housing Units and Streets, for Disabled Persons, 26 September 2014].Google Scholar
Décret n° 2005‐1589 du 19 décembre 2005 relatif à la commission des droits et de l'autonomie des personnes handicapées [Decree on the Disabled Persons' Rights and Autonomy Committee, 19 December 2005].Google Scholar
Loi n° 75‐534 du 30 juin 1975 d'orientation en faveur des personnes handicapées [Framework Law in Favor of Disabled Persons, 30 June 1975].Google Scholar
Loi n° 2005‐102 du 11 février 2005 pour l’égalité des droits et des chances, la participation et la citoyenneté des personnes handicapées [Law on the Equal Rights and Opportunities, the Participation and the Citizenship of Disabled Persons, 11 February 2005.]Google Scholar
Loi n° 2015‐988 du 5 août 2015 ratifiant l'ordonnance n° 2014‐1090 du 26 septembre 2014 relative à la mise en accessibilité des établissements recevant du public, des transports publics, des bâtiments d'habitation et de la voirie pour les personnes handicapées et visant à favoriser l'accès au service civique pour les jeunes en situation de handicap [Law Ratifying the 26/09/2014 Ordinance and Favoring Access to Civic Service for Disabled Youths, 5 August 2015].Google Scholar
Ordonnance n° 2014‐1090 du 26 septembre 2014 relative à la mise en accessibilité des établissements recevant du public, des transports publics, des bâtiments d'habitation et de la voirie pour les personnes handicapées [Ordinance on the Accessibility of Public Buildings and Transportation, Housing Units and Streets, for Disabled Persons, 26 September 2014].Google Scholar