Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T20:40:40.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Native Courts” and the Limits of the Law in Colonial Sudan: Ambiguity as Strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Jeffrey Adam Sachs
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article offers a way of thinking about colonial-era legal reform that departs from traditional narratives by highlighting the importance of legal ambiguity in state building projects. Following the establishment of “Native Administration” in the Sudan in the early 1920s, the British colonial government conferred expansive judicial and administrative powers on tribal sheikhs and nazirs (chiefs), while at the same time discouraging many attempts to formalize or standardize those powers, preferring instead that they remain informal and undefined. This policy, which I term “strategic ambiguity,” emerged out of a belief that tribal leaders would be more effective if they possessed maximum discretion and judicial flexibility, even though the result was a colonial government woefully ill-informed about much of its own judicial system. These findings point to a way of thinking about colonial-era legal reform in which governmental ignorance was actually productive of sovereignty, and not an obstacle to it.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , Fall 2013 , pp. 973 - 992
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abu Shouk, Ahmed Ibrahim. 1998. Kordofan: From Tribes to Nazirates. In Kordofan Invaded: Peripheral Incorporation and Social Transformation in Islamic Africa, ed. Stiansen, Endre and Kevane, Michael, 120–144. Leiden: Brill Press.Google Scholar
Abu Shouk, Ahmed Ibrahim. 2002. Native Courts at Work: A Case Study from Dar Bidayriyya in the Sudan. In Access to Justice: The Role of Court Administrators and Lay Adjudicators in the African and Islamic Contexts, ed. Jones‐Pauly, Christina and Elbern, Stefanie, 75–98. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Al‐Bashir, Hassan. 1966. al‐Idarah al‐Ahliyah fi al‐Sudan [Native Administration in Sudan]. Sudan Journal of Administration and Development 2:25–36.Google Scholar
Al‐Sudani. 2011. Interior Minister: Those Trying to Overthrow the Regime are Exploiting the Blood of Innocents.” Al‐Sudani, September 25 [Arabic].Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. 1970. The Kababish Arabs: Power, Authority and Consent in a Nomadic Tribe. London: C. Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
Awasom, Nicodemus Fru. 2003. “The Vicissitudes of Twentieth‐Century Mankon fons in Cameroon's Changing Social Order.” In The Dynamics of Power and the Rule of Law: Essays on Africa and Beyond, ed. van Binsbergen, Wim, 101–120. Leiden: African Studies Centre.Google Scholar
Bakhit, Ja'far Muhammad Ali. 1972. al‐Idarah al‐Baritaniyah wa al‐harakah al‐wataniyah fi al‐Sudan, 1919–1939 [The British Administration and the Nationalist Movement in Sudan, 1919–1939]. Beirut: Dar al‐Thaqafah.Google Scholar
Beck, Kurt. 1996. Nomads of Northern Kordofan and the State: From Violence to Pacification. Nomadic Peoples 38:73–98.Google Scholar
Beck, Kurt. 2003. Das vorläufige Ende der Razzien. Nomadisches Grenzkriegertum und staatliche Ordnung im Sudan. Difference and Integration 3:127–150.Google Scholar
Bell, Duncan. 2006. Historical Review: Empire and International Relations in Victorian Political Thought. Historical Journal 49:281–298.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. 2002. Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren. 2010. A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Sara. 1992. Hegemony on a Shoestring: Indirect Rule and Access to Agricultural Land. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 62:327–355.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John. 1998. Reflections on the Colonial State, in South Africa and Elsewhere: Factions, Fragments, Facts and Fictions. Social Identities 4:321–361.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John, and Comaroff, Jean. 2006. Law and Disorder in the Postcolony: An Introduction. In Law and Disorder in the Postcolony, ed. Comaroff, Jean and Comaroff, John, 1–56. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert. 1981. The Uses of Jurisdictional Redundancy: Interest, Ideology, and Innovation. William and Mary Law Review 22:639–682.Google Scholar
Daly, M. W. 1986. Empire on the Nile: The Anglo‐Egyptian Sudan, 1898–1934. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, M. W. 1998. Great White Chief: H.A. MacMichael and the Tribes of Kordofan. In Kordofan Invaded: Peripheral Incorporation and Social Transformation in Islamic Africa, ed. Stiansen, Endre and Kevane, Michael, 101–119. Leiden: Brill Press.Google Scholar
Das, Venna, and Poole, Deborah. 2004. Anthropology in the Margins of the State. Oxford: James Curry.Google Scholar
Davies, Reginald. 1957. The Camel's Back: Service in the Rural Sudan. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
El Nur, M. I. 1960. The Role of the Native Courts in the Administration of Justice in the Sudan. Sudan Notes & Records 41:78–87.Google Scholar
FluEhr‐Lobban, Carolyn. 1987. Islamic Law and Society in the Sudan. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Grandin, Nicole. 1982. Le Soudan Nilotique et l'Administration Britanique, 1896–1956. Leiden: Brill Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. A. de C., ed. 1935. The Anglo‐Egyptian Sudan from Within. London: Faber and Faber Limited.Google Scholar
Henderson, K. D. D. 1953. The Making of the Modern Sudan: The Life and Letters of Sir Douglas Newbold, K.B.E. of the Sudan Political Service. London: Faber and Faber Limited.Google Scholar
Herbst, Jeffrey. 2000. States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie. 2009. Emergency Politics: Paradox, Law, Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, Wilson Chacko. 2011. Working Out Egypt: Effendi Masculinity and Subject Formation in Colonial Egypt, 1870–1940. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lea, C. A. E. 1994. On Trek in Kordofan: The Diaries of a British District Officer in the Sudan: 1931–1933, ed. Daly, M. W. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lugard, F. D. 1922. The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa. London: Blackwood.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 1996. Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 2012. Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. 2010a. Alibis of Empire: Henry Maine and the Ends of Liberal Imperialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. 2010b. The Crisis of Liberal Imperialism. Historie@Politique. Politique, culture, société 11:1–25.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2013. Laws Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Technopolitics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Nagila, Hassan. 1964. Dhikriyati fi'l Badiya. Beirut: Manshurat Dar Maktaba Al‐Hiya.Google Scholar
Newbold, Douglas. 1926. Review of Austin Kennett. Sudan Notes & Records 9:140–143.Google Scholar
Otter, Sandra den. 2001. Rewriting the Utilitarian Market: Colonial Law and Custom in Mid‐Nineteenth‐Century British India. European Legacy 6:177–188.Google Scholar
Pitts, Jennifer. 2006. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Qasim, ‘Awn al‐Sharif. 1989. al‐Islam wa al‐‘Arabiyah fi al‐Sudan: dirasat fi al‐hadarah wa al‐lughah [Islam and the Arab in Sudan: Studies in the Civilization and the Language]. Bayrut: Diar al‐Jil.Google Scholar
Roitman, Janet. 2005. Fiscal Disobedience: An Anthropology of Economic Regulation in Central Africa. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sharkey, Heather. 2003. Living with Colonialism: Nationalism and Culture in the Anglo‐Egyptian Sudan. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Pasha, Slatin. 1898. Fire and Sword in the Sudan: A Personal Narrative of Fighting and Serving the Dervishes, 1875–1895. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. P. 1976. Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, E. A. B. 1992. The Togolese Chiefs: Caught Between Scylla and Charibdis? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 32:19–46.Google Scholar
van Rouveroy van Nieuwaal, E. A. B. 1996. State and Chiefs: Are Chiefs Mere Puppets? Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 38:39–78.Google Scholar
von Trotha, Trutz. 1996. From Administrative to Civil Chieftaincy: Some Problems and Prospects of African Chieftaincy. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 38:79–107.Google Scholar
Willis, Justin. 2005. Hukm: The Creolization of Authority in Condominium Sudan. Journal of African History 46:29–50.Google Scholar
Willis, Justin. 2011. Tribal Gatherings: Colonial Spectacle, Native Administration and Local Government in Condominium Sudan. Past and Present 211:243–268.Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

The Mohammedan Law Courts Ordinance, 1902.Google Scholar
The Mohammedan Law Courts Procedure Act, 1915.Google Scholar
The Native Courts Ordinance, 1932.Google Scholar
The Powers of Nomad Sheikhs Ordinance, 1922.Google Scholar
The Powers of Shaykhs Ordinance, 1928.Google Scholar
The Powers of Sheikhs Ordinance, 1927.Google Scholar