Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:19:45.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lawyers and the Conservative Counterrevolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Ann Southworth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What roles have lawyers played in the conservative counterrevolution in US law and public policy? Two recent books, Jefferson Decker's The Other Rights Revolution: Conservative Lawyers and the Remaking of American Government (2016), and Amanda Hollis-Brusky's Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution (2015), speak to the question. This essay explores how these books relate to a larger story of the conservative legal movement and the roles that lawyers and their organizations and networks have played in the conservative turn in American law and politics. It highlights four interrelated threads of the movement's development: creating a support structure for conservative legal advocacy; remaking the judiciary and holding judges accountable; generating, legitimizing, and disseminating ideas to support legal change; and embracing legal activism to roll back government. The essay then considers a continuing challenge for the movement: managing tensions among its several constituencies. Finally, it suggests how this story has played out in litigation to challenge campaign finance regulation.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , Fall 2018 , pp. 1698 - 1728
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abramowitz, Alan I., and Webster, Steven. “The Rise of Negative Partisanship and the Nationalization of U.S. Elections in the 21st Century.” Electoral Studies 41 (2015): 12–22.Google Scholar
Achenbach, Joel. “A Look at the List Helping Trump Reshape the Supreme Court.” Washington Post (2018). http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/politics/ct-trump-supreme-court-list-20180708-story.html.Google Scholar
Adler, Jonathan H. “The Conservative Record on Environmental Policy.” New Atlantis 39 (2013): 133–43.Google Scholar
AFL-CIO. “AFL-CIO Executive Council Statement on Citizens United.” 2012. http://www.aflcio.org/Press-Room/Press-Releases/AFL-CIO-Executive-Council-Statement-on-Citizens-United.Google Scholar
Alliance Defending Freedom. “Defending Your Most Fundamental Freedoms.” 2018a. https://www.adflegal.org/issues.Google Scholar
Alliance Defending Freedom. “We're Defending You, Our Attorneys.” 2018b. adflegal.org/about-us/attorneys.Google Scholar
American Civil Liberties Union. “Campaign Finance Reform.” 2018. https://www.aclu.org/issues/freespeech/campaign-finance-reform.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. “Constitutional Interpretation and Change in the United States: The Official and the Unofficial.” Jus Politicum 14 (2015):1–30.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack, and Levinson, Sanford. “Understanding the Constitutional Revolution.” Virginia Law Review 87 (2001): 1045–1109.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy. “An Originalism for Nonoriginalists.” Loyola Law Review 5 (1999): 611–54.Google Scholar
Barnett, Randy. Restoring the Lost Constitution: The Presumption of Liberty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Katharine T. “Tradition as Past and Present in Substantive Due Process Analysis.” Duke Law Journal 62 (2012): 535–78.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. Ideology in the Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence, and Devins, Neal. “Why the Supreme Court Cares About Elites, Not the American People.” Georgetown Law Review 98 (2010): 1515–44.Google Scholar
Bennett, Daniel. Defending Faith: The Politics of the Christian Legal Movement Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Berger, Raoul. Government by Judiciary: The Transformation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1977.Google Scholar
Beutler, Brian. “The Rehabilitationists.” New Republic. August 30, 2015. https://newrepublic.com/article/122645/rehabilitationists-libertarian-movement-undo-new-deal.Google Scholar
Blasi, Vincent. The Burger Court: The Counter-Revolution That Wasn't. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert. “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems .” Indiana Law Journal 47 (1971): 1–35.Google Scholar
Brown, Steven. Trumping Religion: The New Christian Right, the Free Speech Clause, and the Courts. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy A., and Segers, Mary C. The Catholic Church and the Politics of Abortion: A View from the States. Boulder, CO; Westview Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Steven. Originalism: A Quarter-Century of Debates. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
Cochrane, Emily. “Justice Department Settles with Tea Party Groups After I.R.S. Scrutiny.” New York Times, October 26, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/26/us/politics/irs-tea-party-lawsuit-settlement.html?_r=0).Google Scholar
Cole, David. Engines of Liberty: The Power of Citizen Activists to Make Constitutional Law. New York: Basic Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Collins, Ronald. 2014. “The ACLU & the McCutcheon Case.” SCOTUS Blog. 2014. http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/03/the-aclu-the-mccutcheon-case/.Google Scholar
Collins, Ronald, and Skover, David. When Money Speaks: The McCutcheon Decision, Campaign Finance Laws, and the First Amendment. Oak Park, IL: SCOTUS Books in Brief, 2014.Google Scholar
Decker, Jefferson. The Other Rights Revolution: Conservative Lawyers and the Remaking of American Government. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Dulk, Den, Kevin, R. Prophets in Caesar's Courts: The Role of Ideas in Catholic and Evangelical Rights Advocacy. Unpublished manuscript. University of Wisconsin–Madison, 2001.Google Scholar
Dershowitz, Alan M. “Antonin Scalia's Speeches, Collected for Argument's Sake.” New York Times, October 30, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/books/review/antonin-scalia-speaks-speeches-alan-dershowitz.html.Google Scholar
Devins, Neal, and Baum, Lawrence. “Split Definitive: How Party Polarization Turned the Supreme Court into a Partisan Court.” Supreme Court Review 2016 (2016): 301–77.Google Scholar
Dyche, John David. Republic Leader: A Political Biography of Senator Mitch McConnell. Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Program, 2010.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee. Conservatives in Court. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Kobylka, Joseph F. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard. “Judicial Review: Reckoning on Two Kinds of Error.” Cato Journal 4 (1985): 9–16.Google Scholar
Farber, Daniel A. “The Conservative as Environmentalist: From Goldwater and the Early Reagan to the 21st Century.” 2017. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2919633.Google Scholar
Farrell, Henry. “Trump's Values Are Abhorrent to the Federalist Society of Conservative Lawyers. That Doesn't Stop Them from Helping Him.” Washington Post, May 17, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/05/17/trumps-values-are-abhorrent-to-the-federalist-society-of-conservative-lawyers-that-doesnt-stop-them-from-helping-him/?utm_term=.e9c36978a917.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “Our Background.” 2018a. https://www.fed-soc.org/aboutus/page/our-background.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “Membership, Why Join.” 2018b. https://fedsoc.org/membership.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “Olin-Searle-Smith Fellows in Law (Full-Time).” 2018c. https://www.fed-soc.org/aboutus/page/olin-searle-smith-fellows-in-law-full-time.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “Journalist's Guide to Legal Policy Experts.” 2018d. https://www.fed-soc.org/publications/detail/journalists-guide-to-legal-policy-experts.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “The Federalist Society Pro Bono Center. Federalist Society.” 2018e. https://fedsoc.org/probono.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “Annual Report 2017.” 2018f. https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/annual-report-2017.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “Practice Groups.” 2018g. https://www.fed-soc.org/practice_groups/.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “2005 National Lawyers Convention—‘Originalism’.” 2018h. https://www.fed-soc.org/multimedia/page/2005-national-lawyers-convention-originalism.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “Originalism and the First Amendment.” 2018i. https://www.fed-soc.org/multimedia/detail/originalism-and-the-first-amendment-audiovideo.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “2017 National Lawyers Convention.” 2018j. https://fedsoc.org/events/2017-national-lawyers-convention.Google Scholar
Federalist Society. “Frequently Asked Questions.” 2018k. https://fedsoc.org/frequently-asked-questions.Google Scholar
Feldman, Noah. “Expect the Expected from Trump's Court Nominee.” Discours. November 17, 2016. https://www.discors.com/opinions/7470-expect-the-expected-from-trump-s-court-nominee.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Is There a Text in This Class? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Ford, Matt. “Trump Nominates Neil Gorsuch for the U.S. Supreme Court.” Atlantic. January 31, 2017. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/gorsuch-trump-supreme-court/515232/.Google Scholar
Foundation Center. “Foundation Directory Online.” 2017. https://fconline.foundationcenter.org.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. “The Ideal and the Actual in the Law”: Fantasies and Practices of New York City Lawyers, 1970–1910, in The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America, edited by Gerald W. Gewalt. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1984.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. Taming the Past: Essays on Law in History and History in Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. “The Coming Constitutional Yo-Yo? Elite Opinion, Polarization, and the Direction of Judicial Decision Making.” Howard Law Journal 56 (2013): 661–719.Google Scholar
Hacker, Hans. The Culture of Conservative Christian Litigation. Lanham, MD: Rowland & Littlefield, 2005.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard. Plutocrats United: Campaign Money, the Supreme Court, and the Distortion of American Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard. Justice of Contradictions: Antonin Scalia and the Politics of Disruption. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Southworth, Ann, and Paik, Anthony. “Lawyers for Conservative Causes: Clients, Ideology, and Social Distance.” Law and Society Review 37 (2003): 5–50.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda. Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda, and Wilson, Joshua C. “Playing for the Rules: How and Why New Christian Right Public Interest Law Firms Invest in Secular Litigation.” Law and Public Policy 39 (2017): 121–41.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Michael. “The Public Interest Law Movement: An Analysis with Special Reference to the Role and Practices of Conservative Public Interest Law Firms.” Unpublished memo prepared for the Scaife Foundation, 1980.Google Scholar
Hulse, Carl. “Easy Way to Appease Conservatives: Judicial Appointments.” New York Times, October 18, 2017, A18.Google Scholar
Institute for Free Speech. “About the Institute for Free Speech.” 2018. http://www.campaignfreedom.org/about/.Google Scholar
Institute for Justice. “Issues.” 2018. http://ij.org/issues/.Google Scholar
Institute for Justice. “Political Speech, IJ Defends the First Amendment from Political Censorship.” 1947b. http://ij.org/issues/first-amendment/political-speech/.Google Scholar
Ivers, Greg. “‘Please God, Save This Honorable Court’: The Emergence of the Conservative Religious Bar.” In The Interest Group Connection: Electioneering, Lobbying and Policymaking in Washington, edited by Herrnson, Paul S., Shaiko, Ronald G., and Wilcox, Clyde. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House, 1998.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Sood, Gaurav, and Lelkes, Yphtach. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” Public Opinion 76 (2012): 405–31.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kirk. “Siege Has Ended, But the Battle Over Public Lands Rages On.” New York Times, A1, April 14, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/14/us/public-lands-bundy-malheur-national-wildlife-refuge.html.Google Scholar
Krishnan, Jayanth K., and denDulk, Kevin R. “So Help Me God: A Comparative Study of Religious Interest Group Litigation.” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 30 (2002): 233–75.Google Scholar
Lawson, Gary. “Proving the Law.” Northwestern University Law Review 86 (1992): 859–903.Google Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. “What an Originalist Would Understand ‘Corruption’ to Mean.” California Law Review 102 (2014): 1–24.Google Scholar
Liebman, Robert C., and Wuthnow, Robert, eds. The New Christian Right: Mobilization and Legitimation. New York: Aldine Publishing Co., 1983.Google Scholar
McMahon, Kevin. Nixon's Court: His Challenge to Judicial Liberalism and Its Political Consequences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Mahler, Jonathan. “How One Conservative Think Tank Is Stocking Trump's Government.” New York Times, June 20, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/20/magazine/trump-government-heritage-foundation-think-tank.html.Google Scholar
Meese, Edwin III. “Speech Before the American Bar Association, July 9, 1985.” 1985. https://fedsoc.org/commentary/publications/the-great-debate-attorney-general-ed-meese-iii-july-9-1985.Google Scholar
Mencimer, Stephanie. “The Man Behind Citizens United Is Just Getting Started.” Mother Jones, May/June 2011. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/03/james-bopp-citizens-united.Google Scholar
Meyer, Frank. What Is Conservatism? New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964.Google Scholar
Mutch, Robert E. Buying the Vote: A History of Campaign Finance Reform. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Nash, George. The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America. Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute, 1996.Google Scholar
NeJaime, Douglas. “Constitutional Change, Courts, and Social Movements.” Michigan Law Review 111 (2013): 877–902.Google Scholar
Paik, Anthony, Southworth, Ann, and Heinz, John. “Lawyers of the Right: Networks and Organization.” Law and Social Inquiry 32 (2007): 883–917.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric. “Why Originalism Is So Popular.” New Republic. January 13, 2011. https://newrepublic.com/article/81480/republicans-constitution-originalism-popular.Google Scholar
Post, Robert, and Siegel, Reva. “Originalism as a Political Practice: The Right's Living Constitution.” Fordham Law Review 75 (2006): 545–73.Google Scholar
Powell, Lewis. “Confidential Memorandum: Attack on American Free Enterprise System.” Washington Report Supplement August 23 (1971): 2–8.Google Scholar
Reuters. “Chamber of Commerce Forms Its Own Elite Law Team.” Reuters. December 8, 2014. http://www.reuters.com/article/scotus-firms-chamber/chamber-of-commerce-forms-its-own-elite-law-team-idUSL1N0TS0J620141208.Google Scholar
Roeder, Oliver. “Just How Conservative Was Neil Gorsuch's First Term?” FiveThirtyEight. July 25, 2017. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/just-how-conservative-was-neil-gorsuchs-first-term/.Google Scholar
Savage, Charlie. “Court's Reshaped at Fastest Pace in Five Decades.” New York Times, November 12, 2017, A1.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva. “Dead or Alive: Originalism as Popular Constitutionalism in Heller .” Harvard Law Review 122 (2008): 190–245.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Gordon. Law's Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Smith, Bradley. Unfree Speech: The Folly of Campaign Finance Reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Smith, Bradley. “Politics, Money, and Corruption: The Story of McConnell v. Federal Election Commission.” In Election Law Stories, edited by Douglas, Joshua A. and Mazo, Eugene D., 313–58. St. Paul, MN: Foundation Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert J. “Antonin Scalia's Other Legacy.” Slate. February 16, 2016. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2016/02/antonin_scalia_was_often_a_friend_of_criminal_defendants.html.Google Scholar
Soper, J. Christopher. Evangelical Christianity in the United States and Great Britain: Religious Beliefs, Political Choices. New York: New York University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann. “Conservative Lawyers and the Contest Over the Meaning of ‘Public Interest Law.’” UCLA Law Review 52 (2005): 1223–78.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann. Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann. “What Is Public Interest Law? Empirical Perspectives on an Old Question.” DePaul Law Review 62 (2013): 493–518.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann. “Elements of the Support Structure for Campaign Finance Litigation in the Roberts Court.” Law and Social Inquiry 42 (2017): 1–41.Google Scholar
Teachout, Zephyr. Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin's Snuff Box to Citizens United. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M. The Rise of The Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle to Control the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M. “Transformative Bureaucracy: Reagan's Lawyers and the Dynamics of Political Investment.” Studies in American Political Development 23 (2009): 61–83.Google Scholar
Toobin, Jeffrey. “The Conservative Pipeline to the Supreme Court.” New Yorker. April 17, 2017. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/17/the-conservative-pipeline-to-the-supreme-court.Google Scholar
US Chamber Litigation Center. “About Us, Fighting for Business in the Courts.” 2018 http://www.chamberlitigation.com.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, Benjamin C. “President Trump's Feud with Charles Koch Shows the Conservative Coalition is Cracking up.” Washington Post August 3, 2018. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/made-by-history/wp/2018/08/03/why-the-trump-koch-feud-signals-a-crackup-of-the-conservative-coalition/?utm_term=.12b10857c9d7.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. Harvie. “The Lost Arts of Judicial Restraint.” Green Bag 2d 16 (2012): 51–57.Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam. We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corporation, 2018.Google Scholar
Wolf, Richard. “Justice Gorsuch Confirms Conservatives' Hopes, Liberals' Fears in First Year on Supreme Court.” USA Today. April 8, 2018. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/04/08/justice-gorsuch-confirms-conservatives-hopes-liberals-fears-first-year-supreme-court/486630002/.Google Scholar
Ziegler, Mary. “Originalism Talk: A Legal History.” Brigham Young Law Review 4 (2014): 869–926.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

American Express Co. et al. v. Italian Colors Restaurant, 570 U.S. 228 (2013).Google Scholar
American Tradition P'ship v. Bullock, 132 S. Ct. 2490 (2012).Google Scholar
Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, 564 U.S. 721 (2011).Google Scholar
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, (2011), 563 U.S. 333 (2011).Google Scholar
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 U.S. 652 (1990).Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).Google Scholar
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S. ___ (2014).Google Scholar
Citizens United v. Federal Election Comm'n, 558 U.S. 310 (2010).Google Scholar
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008).Google Scholar
Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, Dkt. 16-285 (2018).Google Scholar
Federal Election Comm'n v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 U.S. 449 (2007).Google Scholar
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978).Google Scholar
Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005).Google Scholar
Good News Club v. Milford Cent. Sch. Dist., 533 U.S. 98 (2001).Google Scholar
Greece v. Galloway, 572 U.S. (2014).Google Scholar
Harris v. Quinn, 543 U.S. ___ (2014).Google Scholar
Heller v. District of Columbia, 554 U.S. 570 (2008).Google Scholar
Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, Dkt. 16–980 (2018).Google Scholar
Janus v. AFSCME, Dkt. 16-1466 (2018).Google Scholar
Lair v. Motl, 16-35424 (9th Cir. en banc 2018).Google Scholar
McConnell v. Federal Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).Google Scholar
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 434 (2014).Google Scholar
McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010).Google Scholar
Nat'l Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra, Dkt. 16-1140 (2018).Google Scholar
NFIB et al. v. Sebelius, 567 U.S. ___ (2012).Google Scholar
Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997).Google Scholar
Randall v. Sorrell, 548 U.S. 230 (2006).Google Scholar
Republican Party of La. et al. v. Federal Election Comm'n, Dkt. 16–865 (2017).Google Scholar
Riddle v. Hickenlooper, 742 F.3d 922 (10th Cir. 2014).Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 2 (2013).Google Scholar
Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. 552 (2011).Google Scholar
SpeechNow.org v. FEC, 599 F.3d. 686 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (en banc).Google Scholar
Williams-Yulee V. Florida Bar, 135 S. Ct. 1656 (2015).Google Scholar
Zimmerman v. City of Austin, 16-51366 (5th Cir. 2018).Google Scholar