Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:03:15.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kaye Scholer as Original Sin: The Lawyer's Duty of Candor and the Bar's Temptations of Evasions and Apology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Geoffrey P. Miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
“From the Trenches and Towers”
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , Spring 1998 , pp. 305 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Bar Association (ABA). 1983. Model Rules of Professional Conduct. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R., and Miller, Geoffrey P. 1993. Kaye, Scholer, FIRREA, and the Desirability of Early Closure: A View of the Kaye, Scholer Case from the Perspective of Bank Regulatory Policy. Southern California Law Review 66:1115–1143.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R., and Miller, Geoffrey P. 1997. Banking Law and Regulation. 2d ed. New York: Aspen Law and Business.Google Scholar
Simon, William H. 1998. The Kaye Scholer Affair: The Lawyer's Duty of Candor and the Bar's Temptations of Evasion and Apology. Law & Social Inquiry 23:243–95.Google Scholar