Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-19T05:41:55.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hopi Tradition as Jurisdiction: On the Potentializing Limits of Hopi Sovereignty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Justin B. Richland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I reconsider Hopi tradition as jurisdiction—reflexive moments of Hopi legal discourse that orient to the limits of Hopi sovereignty, even as they presuppose its power. I explore these themes in two significant moments of Hopi political history. First, I consider the uses of tradition in the creation of the contemporary Hopi tribe through the field notes of the US agent charged with drafting the 1936 Hopi Constitution. Then I consider more contemporary uses of tradition in recent Hopi tribal court cases that extended judicial power over matters reserved for local village leadership. Both instances suggest efforts to potentialize tribal power even as they orient explicitly to the limits of that authority. These traditions are thus, ironically, understood not as replaying Euro‐American logics of nationalist totalities, but as indigenous sociopolitical actions that unsettle static representations of Hopi cultural identity and the sovereignty claimed through them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , Winter 2011 , pp. 201 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Agamben, Gorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Ed. and trans. Heller‐Roazen, Daniel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, Gorgio. 1999. Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Ed. and trans. Heller‐Roazen, Daniel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Agamben, Gorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Trans. Kevin Attell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Alfred, Taikake. 2001. From Sovereignty to Freedom: Toward an Indigenous Political Discourse. Indigenous Affairs 3:22–34.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1978. Critique of Violence. In Walter Benjamin, Reflections, Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, ed. Demetz, Peter, 277–300. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1973. Indo‐European Language and Society, Miami Linguistics Series, vol. 12. Miami, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
Biolsi, Thomas, 2005. Imagined Geographies: Sovereignty, Indigenous Space, and American Indian Struggle. American Ethnologist 32 (2): 239–59.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles. 1996. Politics of Discursive Authority in Research on the “Invention of Tradition. Cultural Anthropology 11 (4): 435–69.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F. 2007. Sovereignty's Betrayals. In Indigenous Experience Today, ed. de la Cadena, Marisol and Starn, Orin, 171–194 Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Bruyneel, Kevin. 2007. The Third Space of Sovereignty. The Postcolonial Politics of U.S.‐Indigenous Relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
de la Cadena, Marisol, and Starn, Orin, eds. 2007. Indigenous Experience Today. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Cattelino, Jessica. 2006. Florida Seminole Housing and the Social Meaning of Sovereignty. Comparative Studies in Society and History 48:699–26.Google Scholar
Clemmer, Richard O. 1995. Roads in the Sky: The Hopi Indians in a Century of Change. Denver, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Coffey, Wallace, and Tsosie, Rebecca. 2001. Rethinking the Tribal Sovereignty Doctrine: Cultural Sovereignty and the Collective Future of Indian Nations. Stanford Law and Policy Review 12:191–221.Google Scholar
Cormack, Bradin. 2008. A Power to Do Justice. Jurisdiction, English Literature, and the Rise of Common Law, 1509–1625. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1998 1976. Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Dirlik, Arif. 1999. The Past as Legacy and Project: Postcolonial Criticism in the Perspective of Indigenous Historicism. In Contemporary Native American Political Issues, ed. Johnson, Troy R. J., 73–97. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, Kirk, 2001. Against Culture: Development, Politics, and Religion in Indian Alaska. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, Kirk. 2002. The Praxis of Indigenism and Alaska Native Timber Politics. American Anthropologist 104 (4): 1062–73.Google Scholar
Dombrowski, Kirk. 2004. The Politics of Native Culture. In A Companion to the Anthropology of American Indians, ed. Biolsi, Thomas, 360–82. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Douzinas, Costas. 2007. The Metaphysics of Jurisdiction.” In Jurisprudence of Jurisdicition, ed. McVeigh, Shaun, 21–32. New York: Routledge Cavendish Press.Google Scholar
Eggan, Frederick R. 1950. Social Organization of the Western Pueblos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard T. 1999. Law's Territory (A History of Jurisdiction). Michigan Law Review 97 (4): 843–930.Google Scholar
Geertz, Armin. 1994. The Invention of Prophecy. Continuity and Meaning in Hopi Indian Religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ishii, Lomayumptewa. 2001. Voices from Our Ancestors: Hopi Resistance to Scientific Historicide. PhD diss., Dept. of History, Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. 1993. Language, History, and Identity. Ethnolinguistic Studies of the Arizona Tewa. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Levy, Jerrold. 1992. Orayvi Revisited. Social Stratification in an “Egalitarian” Society. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
McMillan, L. Jane. 2011. Colonial Traditions, Co‐optations, and Mi'kmaq Legal Consciousness. Symposium: Law & Social Inquiry 36 (1): 171–200.Google Scholar
McNickel, D'Arcy W. 1971. Indian Man: The Life of Oliver LaFarge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
McVeigh, Shaun, ed. 2007. Jurisprudence of Jurisdicition. New York: Routledge Cavendish Press.Google Scholar
Miller, Bruce G. 2001. The Problem of Justice: Tradition and Law in the Coast Salish World. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Nesper, Larry. 2011. Law and Ojibwe Indian “Traditional Cultural Property” in the Organized Resistance to the Crandon Mine in Wisconsin. Symposium: Law & Social Inquiry 36 (1): 151–69.Google Scholar
Richland, Justin B. 2005. “What Are You Going to Do with the Village's Knowledge?” Talking Tradition, Talking Law in Hopi Tribal Court. Law and Society Review 39:235–71.Google Scholar
Richland, Justin B. 2008a. Arguing with Tradition: The Language of Law in Hopi Tribal Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richland, Justin B. 2008b. The State of Hopi Exception. When Inheritance Is What You Have. Law and Literature Review 20 (2): 261–78.Google Scholar
Richland, Justin B. 2009. Hopi Sovereignty as Epistemological Limit. Wicazo Sa Review 24 (1): 89–112.Google Scholar
Sekaquaptewa, Patricia. 2000. Evolving the Hopi Common Law. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 9:761–91.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 1985. Political Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Titiev, Mischa. 1944. “Old Oraibi: A Study of the Hopi Indians of Third Mesa.” Harvard University Peabody Museum of American Archaeology and Ethnology Papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Udall, Sharyn R. 1992. The Irresistible Other: Hopi Ritual Drama and Euro‐American Audiences. The Drama Review 36 (2): 23–43.Google Scholar
United States Census. 2000. American Indian and Alaska Native Summary File (AIANSF). http://www.census.gov/census2000/AIANSF.html (accessed October 14, 2010).Google Scholar
Voth, Henry R. 1968 1903. The Oraibi Summer Snake Ceremony. Field Columbian Museum Publication, Anthropology Series No. 83 (4). Chicago: Field Museum Press.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Peter. 1985. Unpacking Hopi “Clans”: Another Vintage Model Out of Africa? Journal of Anthropological Research 41:359–74.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Peter. 1986. Unpacking Hopi “Clans” II: Further Questions about Hopi Descent Groups. Journal of Anthropological Research 42:69–79.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Peter. 1987. The Interpretation of Politics: A Hopi Conundrum. Man 22:696–714.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Peter. 1988. Deliberate Acts. Changing Hopi Culture through the Oraibi Split. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Peter. 1998. Rethinking Hopi Ethnography. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality. Ed. Carroll, J. B. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Hybrid Democracy: Iroquois Federalism and the Postcolonial Project. In Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, ed. Ivison, Duncan, Patton, Paul, and Sanders, Will, 237–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

All cases can be found at: http://www.hopicourts.com/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=50&group=13 (accessed October 16, 2010).Google Scholar
In The Matter of the Estate of: Neomi Komaquaptewa, 01AP000013, Hopi Appellate Court (2002).Google Scholar
Nutongla‐Sanchez v. Garcia et al., 98AP 0000014, Hopi Appellate Court (1999).Google Scholar
Ross v. Sulu, CIV‐023‐88, Hopi Apellate Court (1991).Google Scholar
Smith v. James, 98AP000011 (Hopi Appellate Court (1999).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Constitution and By‐Laws of the Hopi Tribe, Arizona. 1936. http://www.hopicourts.com/index.php?option=com_docman&Itemid=50&group=13 (accessed October 16, 2010)Google Scholar
Dawes General Allotment Act of 1887, 24 Stat. 388, 25 U.S.C. sec. 331 et seq.Google Scholar
Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 (Wheeler‐Howard Act), 48 Stat. 984, 25 U.S.C. secs. 461–479.Google Scholar

Archival Documents

Oliver La Farge Collection. Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center, University of Texas at Austin. All documents are unpublished.Google Scholar