Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-72kh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T09:50:56.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History, Race, and Prediction: Comments on Harcourt's Against Prediction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Ariela Gross
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reviews Bernard Harcourt's Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age (2007). It places the rise of actuarialism in criminal law in the United States in the context of trends in other areas of law, as well as in penology. It further suggests that this move toward actuarial thinking cannot in fact be separated from race; that prediction has always involved racial profiling, and that it is no accident that it does so.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , Winter 2008 , pp. 233 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Feeley, Malcolm M., and Simon, Jonathan. 1992. The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications. Criminology 30:449–74.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M., and Simon, Jonathan. 1994. Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law. In The Futures of Criminology, ed. Nelken, David, 173–201. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Garton, Stephen. 2003. Managing Mercy: African Americans, Parole and Paternalism in the Georgia Prison System, 1919–1945. Journal of Social History 36:675–99.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E. 2007. Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. Herman. 1940. Parole in Alabama. Social Forces 18:385–91.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Randall. 1997. Race, Crime and the Law. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Ogletree, Charles Jr., and Sarat, Austin, eds. 2006. From Lynch Mobs to the Killing State: Race and the Death Penalty in America. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Park, Robert E., and Burgess, Ernest W. 1921. Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Park, Robert E., Burgess, Ernest W., and McKenzie, Roderick D. 1925. The City: Suggestions for the Study of Human Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Park, Robert E., and Thompson, E. T. 1939. Race Relations and the Race Problem: A Definition and an Analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy. 2004. The Social and Moral Cost of Mass Incarceration in African American Communities. Stanford Law Review 56:1271–1305.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2003. Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 1988. The Ideological Effects of Actuarial Practices. Law & Society Review 22:771–800.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 2005. Reversal of Fortune: The Resurgence of Individual Risk Assessment in Criminal Justice. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1:397–421.Google Scholar
Tibbitts, Clark. 1931. Success or Failure on Parole Can Be Predicted. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 22:11–50.Google Scholar