Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T16:25:33.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond Global Convergence: Conflicts of Legitimacy in a Chinese Lower Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Sida Liu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the localization of global legal institutions by the case study of a lower court in China's Hebei Province. Using data on the changes in the formal organizational structure, the composition of personnel, the case docket, and case dispositions in this court between 1978 and 2000, the author demonstrates that global legal institutions have survived in China's judicial practice by adapting to indigenous social and political demands and becoming localized. The day-to-day judicial work of Chinese lower court judges is only loosely coupled with their formal roles, and the judicial decision-making process is contingent upon the historical origin of the judiciary, administrative influence, and the legal consciousness of local communities. The underlying reason for the localization process is the complexity of legitimacy at the local level. Global prescription, economic pressure, political influence, and local social order all require certain types of legitimacy from the legal institutions. As a result, beyond the symbolic functions of global convergence, the practical meanings of the legal institutions are socially constructed in the judicial practice to reconcile the conflicts between global and local sources of legitimacy.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , Winter 2006 , pp. 75 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2006 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajani, Gianmaria. 1995. By Chance and Prestige: Legal Transplants in Russia and Eastern Europe. American Journal of Comparative Law 43: 93–117.Google Scholar
Alford, William P. 1999. A Second Great Wall? China's Post-Cultural Revolution Project of Legal Construction. Cultural Dynamics 11: 193–213.Google Scholar
Berman, Jesse. 1969. The Cuban Popular Tribunals. Columbia Law Review 69: 1317–54.Google Scholar
Black, Donald. 1976. The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth H. 1998. Political Frames and Legal Activity. Law & Society Review 32: 141–74.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth H. 2000. Is Law the Rule? Using Political Frames to Explain Cross-National Variation in Legal Activity. Social Forces 79: 385–418.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth H., and Meyer, John W. 2002. Modern Law as a Secularized and Global Model: Implications for the Sociology of Law, 65–95. In Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy, Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B., eds. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Cai, Dingjian. 1999. Development of the Chinese Legal System Since 1979 and Its Current Crisis and Transformation. Cultural Dynamics 11: 135–66.Google Scholar
Clark, John P. 1989. Conflict Management Outside the Courtrooms of China. In Troyer, R. J., Clark, J. P., and Rojek, D. G., eds, Social Control in the People's Republic of China. New York: Praeger. Google Scholar
Clarke, Donald C. 1991. Dispute Resolution in China. Journal of Chinese Law 5: 245–96.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant. 1997. Law, Lawyers and Social Capital: “Rules of Law” versus Relational Capitalism. Social & Legal Studies 6: 109–41.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant, eds. 2002. Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Diamant, Neil J. 2000. Conflict and Conflict Resolution in China: Beyond Mediation-centered Approaches. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44: 523–46.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W. 1983. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–60.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. 1990. Legal Environment and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace. American Journal of Sociology 95: 1401–40.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. and Suchman, Mark C. 1999. When the “Haves” Hold Court: Speculations on the Organizational Internalization of Law. Law and Society Review 33: 941–91.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. 1991. The Structural Transformation of American Industry: An Institutional Account of the Causes of Diversification in the Largest Firms, 1919–1979, 293–311. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Powell, W. W. and DiMaggio, P., eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Frank, David J., Hironaka, Ann, and Schofer, Evan. 2000. The Nation-State and the Natural Environment over the Twentieth Century. American Sociological Review 65: 96–116.Google Scholar
Frank, David J., and Meyer, John W. 2002. The Profusion of Individual Roles and Identities in the Post-War Period. Sociological Theory 20: 86–105.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review 9: 95–160.Google Scholar
Griffiths, John. 1986. What Is Legal Pluralism? Journal of Legal Pluralism 24: 1.Google Scholar
Hannan, Michael T., and Freeman, John. 1984. Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociology Review 49: 149–64.Google Scholar
He Weifang. 1998a. Ershi Nian Fazhi Jianshe de Mei yu Buzu [Advantage and Disadvantage in the Construction of Legal System in the Recent Twenty Years]. Zhongwai Faxue [Peking University Law Journal], No. 5.Google Scholar
He Weifang. 1998b. Fuzhuan Junren Jin Fayuan [Installing Army Veterans in Courts]. Nanfang Zhoumo[Southern Weekend], January 2.Google Scholar
He Weifang. 1998c. Quanneng Xing Yamen: Chuantong yu Yingxiang [Omnipotent Government: Tradition and Effect]. Nanfang Zhoumo[Southern Weekend], January 16.Google Scholar
He Weifang. 1998d. Sifa de Linian yu Zhidu[The Concepts and Systems of Judicature]. Beijing: China Political Science and Law University Press. Google Scholar
Ji Weidong. 1993. Falü Chengxu de Yiyi—Dui Zhongguo Fazhi Jianshe de Lingyizhong Sikao [The Significance of Legal Procedures—Further Reflection on China's Construction of a Legal System]. Zhongguo Shehui Kexue[Social Sciences in China], No. 1.Google Scholar
Jiang Shigong. 1997. Xiangcun Shehui de Sifa Shijian: Zhishi, Jishu yu Quanli [Judicial Practice in the Rural Area: Knowledge, Technology and Power]. Beijing Daxue Yanjiusheng Xuekan[Peking University's Graduate Journal], No. 3.Google Scholar
Klein, David E., and Hume, Robert J. 2003. Fear of Reversal as an Explanation of Lower Court Compliance. Law & Society Review 37: 579–606.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M., and Silbey, Susan, eds. 2003. In Litigation: Do the “Haves” Still Come Out Ahead? Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
Levin, Martin A. 1977. Urban Politics and the Criminal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Li, Victor H. 1977. Law Without Lawyers: A Comparative View of Law in China and the United States. Stanford: Stanford Alumni Association. Google Scholar
Lubman, Stanley. 1967. Mao and Mediation: Politics and Dispute Resolution in Communist China. California Law Review 55: 1284–1359.Google Scholar
Lubman, Stanley. 1999. Bird in a Cage: Legal Reforms in China after Mao. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
Macauley, Melissa. 1998. Social Power and Legal Culture: Litigation Masters in Late Imperial China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar
McAleavy, Henry. 1962. The People's Courts in Communist China. American Journal of Comparative Law 11: 52–65.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 1988. Legal Pluralism. Law & Society Review 22: 869–96.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 1992a. Popular Justice and the Ideology of Social Transformation. Social & Legal Studies 1: 161–76.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 1992b. Anthropology, Law, and Transnational Processes. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 357–79.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 1995. Resistance and the Cultural Power of Law. Law & Society Review 29: 11–26.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–63.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 1998. Tradition in the Shadow of Modern Legal Practice: Continuity and Change in the Delivery of Justice in China. Chinese Law and Government 31(5):5–38.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 2002. When Organizations Subsume Formal Law: Work Units and the Structure of Disputing in Urban China. Presented at American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 2003. Unhooking from the State: Chinese Lawyers in Transition. Ph.D. diss. Department of Sociology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 2005. Global Institutions, Indigenous Meaning: Appropriation and Indigenization in the Chinese Legal System. Paper presented at the Workshop on Comparative Institutional Research, Peking University, October 14–16.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall. 2002. China's Long March Toward Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall. 2003. A Government of Laws: Democracy, Rule of Law and Administrative Law Reform in the PRC. Journal of Contemporary China 12(34):45–67.Google Scholar
Pei, Minxin. 1997. Citizen v. Mandarins: Administrative Litigation in China. China Quarterly 152: 832–62.Google Scholar
Pistor, Katharina, Wellons, Philip A., Sachs, Jeffrey D., and Scott, Hal S. 1998. The Role of Law and Legal Institutions in Asian Economic Development, 1960–1995. Executive Summary prepared for the Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman B. 2001. The Chinese Legal System: Globalization and Local Legal Culture. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
QN[Qinghe Nianjian (Qinghe Yearbook)]. 1996. Qinghe: Qinghe Difangzhi Bangongshi.Google Scholar
Robertson, John. 1974. Rough Justice: Perspectives on Lower Criminal Courts. Boston: Little Brown and Co. Google Scholar
Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1992. State, Law and Community in the World System: An Introduction. Social & Legal Studies 1: 131–42.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1966. TVA and the Grass Roots. New York: Harper & Row. Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. 1981. Making Sense of the Lower Courts. The Justice System Journal 6(1):13–27.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1990. Information and Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
Strang, David, and Meyer, John W. 1993. Institutional Conditions for Diffusion. Theory and Society 22: 487–511.Google Scholar
Su, Li. 1996. Fazhi jiqi Bentu Ziyuan[Rule of Law and its Indigenous Resources]. Beijing: China Political Science and Law University Press. Google Scholar
Su, Li . 1998. Weishenme Songfa Shangmen? [Why Hold a Court in Peasant's House?] Shehuixue Yanjiu[Sociological Research], No. 2.Google Scholar
Su, Li . 2000a. Songfa Xiaxiang—Zhonguo Jiceng Sifa Zhidu Yanjiu[Bring Law to Countryside—Research on the Grassroots Judicial System of China]. Beijing: China Political Science and Law University Press. Google Scholar
Su, Li . 2000b. Jiceng Faguan de Sifa Suzhi—Cong Yishen Panjue Shangsulv Toushi [The Trial Quality of Chinese Grassroots Judges—Reflections on the Appeal Rates of First Trials]. Faxue[Law Science Monthly], No. 3.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark C., and Edelman, Lauren B. 1996. Legal Rational Myths: The New Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition. Law & Social Inquiry 21: 903–41.Google Scholar
Waelde, Thomas W., and Gunderson, James L. 1994. Legislative Reform in Transition Economies: Western Transplants: A Short-Cut to Social Market Economy Status? International and Comparative Law Quarterly 43: 347–78.Google Scholar
Wall, James A. Jr., and Blum, Michael. 1991. Community Mediation in the People's Republic of China. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35: 3–20.Google Scholar
Wang, Liming. 1999. Sifa Gaige Yanjiu[Research on the Judicial Reform]. Beijing: Publishing House of Law. Google Scholar
Wang, Mingming and Feuchtwang, Stephan, eds. 1997. Xiangtu Shehui de Zhixu, Gongzheng yu Quanwei[Order, Justice and Authority in Rural Society]. Beijing: China Political Science and Law University Press. Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society, Roth, G. and Wittich, C., eds. Berkeley: University of California Press. Google Scholar
Weiss, Edith B. 1972. The East German Social Courts: Development and Comparison with China. American Journal of Comparative Law 20: 266–89.Google Scholar
Woo, Margaret Y. K. 1991. Adjudication Supervision and Judicial Independence in the P. R. C. American Journal of Comparative Law 39: 95–119.Google Scholar
Woo, Margaret Y. K. 1999. Law and Discretion in the Contemporary Chinese Courts. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal 8: 581–615.Google Scholar
ZFN [Zhongguo Falü Nianjian (China Law Yearbook)]. 19862000. Beijing: Zhongguo Falv Nianjian She.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qianfan. 2003. The People's Court in Transition: The Prospects of the Chinese Judicial Reform. Journal of Contemporary China 12(34):69–101.Google Scholar
Zhao, Zhenjiang. 1993. Lun Shehui Zhuyi Shichang Jingji Fazhi Jianshe [On the Development of a Legal System for Socialist Market Economy]. Beijing Daxue Xuebao[Journal of Peking University], No. 4.Google Scholar
Zhao, Xiaoli. 1999. Tongguo Falü de Zhili: Nongcun Jiceng Fayuan Yanjiu[Governmentality by Law: a Study of Chinese Grassroots Courts in Rural Area]. Ph.D. diss. School of Law, Peking University, Beijing, P. R. China.Google Scholar
Zhao, Xudong. 1998. Xiangtu Shehui zhong de Quanwei Duoyuan yu Jiufen Jiejue[Patterns of Dispute Resolution in Rural China: Authority Plurality and Dispute Resolution in a Northern China Village]. Ph.D. diss. Department of Sociology, Peking University, Beijing, P. R. China.Google Scholar
Zhong, Jianhua. 1993. An Guoji Biaozhun Wanshan Woguo de Jingji Lifa [Promoting Economic Legislation of China According to International Standard]. Zhongguo Faxue [Chinese Legal Science], No. 2.Google Scholar