Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T14:54:49.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tender Ties: Husbands' Rights and Racial Exclusion in Chinese Marriage Cases, 1882-1924

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Todd Stevens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When Congress ended the immigration of Chinese laborers in 1882, the Chinese population was over 95% male. While there has been much disagreement about why so few women came, the more fruitful question may be to ask how Chinese women were able to immigrate to the United States at all. Central to their immigration were legal arguments for lawful Chinese immigrants—primarily merchants and native-bom citizens—to bring their wives to the United States. Due to racial restrictions barring them from independent entry or marital naturalization, Chinese wives appealed to the uncodified gender privileges of their husbands in turn-of-the-century legal society: the natural right of a man to the company of his wife and children. In the face of a bureaucratic structure designed to sift immigrants by race, judges ruled that racial admission policies must conform to established gender privileges. The power of these arguments was tested in cases involving the deportation of Chinese women admitted as wives. While initially evading registration regulations for immigrants, Chinese women were unsuccessful at evading regulations concerning prostitution. This failure underscored the performative aspects of husbands' rights arguments, especially the image of the dutiful wife and husband and the class-based ideal of the elite merchant or citizen.

Type
Article
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , Spring 2002 , pp. 271 - 305
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonacich, Bona, and Cheng, Lucie, eds. 1984. Labor Immigration under Capitalism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bonner, Arthur. 1997. Alas What Brought Thee Hither: The Chinese in New York, 1800-1950. Madison, N. J.: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, Paul. 1978. Urban Masses and Moral Order in America, 1820-1920. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bredbenner, Candice Lewis. 1998. A Nationality of Her Own: Women, Marriage, and the Law of Citizenship. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Burnham, Margaret A. 1987. An Impossible Marriage: Slave Law and Family Law. Law and Inequality 5: 187-225.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 2000. The Paradoxes of Race, Class, Identity, and “Passing”: Enforcing the Chinese Exclusion Acts, 1882-1910. Law & Social Inquiry 25: 1–40.Google Scholar
Chan, Sucheng, ed. 1991a. Entry Denied: Exclusion and the Chinese Community in America, 1882-1943. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 1991b. Exclusion of Chinese Women. In Chan 1991a, 94–136.Google Scholar
Chinese Historical Society of Southern California and UCLA Asian American Studies Center. 1994. Origins and Destinations: 41 Essays on Chinese America. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Commissioner-General of Immigration. 19001930. Annual Reports of the Commissioner-General of Immigration. Washington, D. C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Coolidge, Mary. 1909. Chinese Immigration. New York: H. Holt.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy F. 1998. Marriage and Women's Citizenship in the United States, 1830-1934. American Historical Review 103: 1440–74.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy F. 2000. Public Vows: a History of Marriage and the Nation. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum 139–68.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1991. Women of Color at the Center: Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review 43: 1241–99.Google Scholar
Culin, Stewart. 1887. China in America: Social Life of the Chinese in Eastern Cities of the United States. Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Fritz, Christian. 1988. A Nineteenth Century “Habeas Corpus Mill”: The Chinese before the Federal Courts in California. American Journal of Legal History 32: 347–72.Google Scholar
Fritz, Christian. 1991a. Federal Justice in California: The Court of Ogden Hoffman, 1851–91. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Fritz, Christian. 1991b. Due Process and Treaty Rights and Chinese Exclusion. In Chan 1991a, 25–56.Google Scholar
General Case Files. 1925. U. S. District Court for the District of Washington. Records of District Courts of the United States, Record Group 21. National Archives and Records Administration-Pacific Alaska Region, Seattle.Google Scholar
Gyory, Andrew. 1998. Closing the Gate: Race, Politics, and the Chinese Exclusion Act. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 1997. Lawyering, Husband's Rights, and “The Unwritten Law. Journal of American History 84: 67–96.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 2000. Man and Wife in America: A History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hing Ong, Bill. 1993. Making and Remaking Asian America through Immigration Policy, 1850-1990. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirata, Lucy Cheng. 1984. Free, Indentured, Enslaved: Chinese Prostitutes in California in Nineteenth Century America. In Bonacich and Cheng 1984, 402–34.Google Scholar
Hsu, Madeline Yuan-yin. 2000. Dreaming of Gold, Dreaming of Home: Transnationalism and Migration between the United States and China, 1882-1943. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kaczorowski, Robert, 1987. To Begin the Nation Anew: Congress, Citizenship, and Civil Rights after the Civil War. American Historical Review 92: 45–68.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Randall. 1986. Race Relations Law and the Tradition of Celebration: The Case of Prof. Schmidt. Columbia Law Review 86: 1622–61.Google Scholar
Kettner, James H. 1978. The Development of American Citizenship, 1608-1870. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press,.Google Scholar
Lee, Erika. 1998. At America's Gates: Chinese Immigration during the Exclusion Era, 1882–1943. Ph. D. diss., University of California, Berkeley .Google Scholar
Lu, Huping. 1994. Chinese Merchant Wives in the United States, 1840–1945. In Chinese Historical Society of Southern California and UCLA Asian American Studies Center. 1994.Google Scholar
Lyman, Stanford. 1968. Marriage and the Family among Chinese Immigrants to America, 1850-1960. Phylon 29: 321–30.Google Scholar
Lyman, Stanford. 1974. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliation in San Francisco's Chinatown, 1880-1910. Pacific Historical Review 43: 473–99.Google Scholar
Ma, Eve Armentrout. 1983. Urban Chinese at the Sinitic Frontier: Social Organizations in United States' Chinatowns, 1849-1898. Modem Asian Studies 17: 107–135.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. A. C. 1996. Introduction. In Reid 1996, i–xx.Google Scholar
McClain, Charles. 1994. In Search of Equality: The Chinese Struggle against Discrimination in Nineteenth-Century America. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McCurdy, Charles. 1975. Justice Field and the Jurisprudence of Government-Business Relations: Some Parameters of Laissez-faire Constitutionalism, 1863-1897. Journal of American History 61: 970–1005.Google Scholar
McKee, Delber L. 1977. Chinese Exclusion versus the Open Door Policy, 1900-1906. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
McKeown, Adam. 1999. Transnational Chinese Families and Chinese Exclusion, 1875-1943. Journal of American Ethnic History 18: 73–110.Google Scholar
Miller, Stuart Creighton. 1969. The Unwelcome Immigrant: The American Image of the Chinese, 1785–1882. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Mooney, Ralph James. 1984. Matthew Deady and the Federal Judicial Response to Racism in the Early West. Oregon Law Review 63: 561–638.Google Scholar
Morris, Thomas D. 1996. Southern Slavery and the Law. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Osumi, Megumi Dick. 1982. Asians and California's Anti-Miscegenation Laws. In Asian and Pacific American Experiences: Women's Perspectives, ed. Tsuchida, Nobuya. Minneapolis: Asian/Pacific American Learning Resource Center and General College, University of Minnesota, 1–37.Google Scholar
Pascoe, Peggy. 1990. Relations of Rescue: The Search for Female Moral Authority in the American West, 1874–1939. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pascoe, Peggy. 1996. Miscegenation Law, Court Cases, and Ideologies of “Race” in Twentieth Century America. Journal of American History 83: 44–69.Google Scholar
Peffer, George Anthony. 1986. Forbidden Families: Emigration Experiences of Chinese Women under the Page Law, 1875-1882. Journal of American Ethnic History 6: 28–46.Google Scholar
Peffer, George Anthony. 1992. From Under the Sojourner's Shadow: A Historiographical Study of Chinese Female Immigration to America, 1852-1882. Journal of American Ethnic History 11: 41–67.Google Scholar
Peffer, George Anthony. 1999. If They Don't bring their Women Here: Chinese Female Immigration before Exclusion. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Anthony ed. 1996. Sojoumers and Settlers: Histories of Southeast Asia and the Chinese in Honour of Jennifer Cushman. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Salyer, Lucy. 1995. Laws Harsh as Tigers: Chinese Immigrants and the Shaping of Modem Immigration Law. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Saxton, Alexander. 1971. The Indispensable. Enemy: Labor and the Anti-Chinese Movement in California. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shah, Nayan. 2001. Contagious Diseases: Epidemics and Race in San Francisco's Chinatown. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva. 1994a. Home as Work: The First Woman's Rights Claims Concerning Wives' Household Labor, 1850-1880. Yale Law Journal 103: 1073–1219.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva. 1994b. The Modernization of Marital Status Law: Adjudicating Wives' Rights to Earnings, 1860-1930. Georgetown Law Journal 82: 2127–212.Google Scholar
Smith, Rogers. 1997. Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U. S. History. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Survey of Race Relations. 192325. Woo Gen, box 27, file 183. Hoover Institution of War, Revolution, and Peace; Stanford University, Stanford, Calif .Google Scholar
Torok, John Hayakawa. 1996. Reconstruction and Racial Nativism: Chinese Immigrants and the Debates on the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments and Civil Rights Laws. Asian Law Journal 3: 55–103.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Immigration and Naturalization. 192430. Letters. National Archives Record Group 85, Chinese Exclusion Act Case Files, Seattle District. National Archives-Pacific Alaska Region.Google Scholar
U. S. House. 1909. White Slave Traffic, Illegal Importation, and Interstate Transportation of Alien Women and Girls for Prostitution, with minority report, H. R. 47, 61st Cong., 2d sess.Google Scholar
U. S. House. 1926. Admission of Wives of American Citizens of Oriental Ancestry, Hearings before the Committee of Immigration and Naturalization. 69 Cong., 1st sess. H419–1.Google Scholar
U. S. House. 1928. Wives of American Citizens of the Oriental Race, Hearings before the Committee of Immigration and Naturalization. 70th Cong., 1st sess. H477–2.Google Scholar
U. S. House. 1930. Wives of American Citizens of Oriental Race, Hearings before the Committee of Immigration and Naturalization. 71st Cong., 2d sess. H559–3.Google Scholar
U. S. Senate. 1909. Importing Women for Immoral Purposes, 61st Cong., 2d. sess. S. Doc. No. 196.Google Scholar
U. S. Senate. 1910. White Slave Traffic. 61st Cong., 2d. sess. S. Rep. No. 886.Google Scholar
Volpp, Leti. 2001. “Obnoxious to their Very Nature”: Asian Americans and Constitution Citizenship. Asian Law journal 8: 71–87.Google Scholar
Wong, K. Scott. 1996. “The Eagle seeks a Helpless Quarry”: Chinatown, the Police, and the Press: The 1903 Boston Chinatown Raid Revisited. Amerasia Journal 22: 81–103.Google Scholar
Yung, Judy. 1995. Unbound Feet: A Social History of Chinese Women in San Francisco. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar