Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-lkk24 Total loading time: 0.232 Render date: 2021-09-22T03:40:55.537Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Reply to Commentators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bilz, Kenworthey. 2007. The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge. Boston University Law Review 87:10591112.Google Scholar
Brooks, Richard R. W., and Rose, Carol M. 2013. Saving the Neighborhood: Racially Restrictive Covenants, Law, and Social Norms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 2008. The Household: Informal Order Around the Hearth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ellickson, Robert C. 2016. Forceful Self‐Help and Private Voice: How Schauer and McAdams Exaggerate a State's Ability to Monopolize Violence and Expression. Law & Social Inquiry 42:4959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1970. The Expressive Function of Punishment. In Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility, 95–118. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and McAdams, Richard H. 2004. Adjudicating in Anarchy: An Expressive Theory of International Dispute Resolution. William and Mary Law Review 45:12291339.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K., 2016. The Problem of Social Order: What Should We Count as Law? Law & Social Inquiry 42:1627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K., and Weingast, Barry R. 2012. What Is Law? A Coordination Model of the Characteristics of Legal Order. Journal of Legal Analysis 4:471514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1989. Why a Constitution? In The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism, ed. Bernard Grofman and Donald Wittman, 101–20. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Herzog, Don. 2017. Democracy, Law, Compliance. Law & Social Inquiry 42:615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahan, Dan M. 1997. Social Influence, Social Meaning, and Deterrence, Virginia Law Review 83:349–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kar, Robin Bradley. 2017. The Evolutionary Game‐Theoretic Foundations of Law. Law & Social Inquiry 42:3848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 1995 The Regulation of Social Meaning. University of Chicago Law Review 62:9431045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, Lawrence. 1996. Social Meaning and Social Norms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144:2181–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Daryl. 2017. The Inevitability and Indeterminacy of Game‐Theoretic Accounts of Legal Order. Law & Social Inquiry 42:2837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, Richard H. 2001. Signaling Discount Rates: Law, Norms, and Economic Methodology. Yale Law Journal 110:625–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, Richard H. 2015. The Expressive Powers of Law: Theories and Limits. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Janice. 2017. Expressive Law, Social Norms, and Social Groups. Law & Social Inquiry 42:6075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., and Darley, John M. 2007. Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy. Southern California Law Review 81:167.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2015. The Force of Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunshine, Jason, and Tyler, Tom R. 2003. The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing. Law & Society Review 37:513–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry R. 1997 . The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. American Political Science Review 91:245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Reply to Commentators
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Reply to Commentators
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Reply to Commentators
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *