Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T09:37:02.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prolonged Armed Conflict and Diminished Deference to the Military: Lessons from Israel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

We examine whether the level of deference shown by the Israeli Supreme Court to military decisions has changed over time by empirically analyzing the entire body of Supreme Court decisions in petitions against the military commander between 1990 and 2005. Setting forth a number of different factors that might generally affect the degree of deference to state agencies, we hypothesized that there would be a decrease in deference in the relationship between the Court and the military commander during the examined period. Our findings show that deference to the military commander has indeed diminished significantly. We argue that this is best explained by the continuation of the armed conflict (and its aftermath, namely, the routinization and increase in the number of petitions by the civilian population) and also—to some extent—by the rise of a substantive rule‐of‐law legal consciousness, central to which is the importance of human rights.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Allan, T. R. S. 2006. Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of “Due Deference.” Cambridge Law Journal 65:671–95.Google Scholar
Arian, Asher, Atmor, Nir, and Hadar, Yael. 2006. The 2006 Israeli Democracy Index. Jerusalem: Israel Democracy Institute.Google Scholar
Barzilai, Gad. 2004. How Far Do Justices Go: The Limits of Judicial Decisions. In Critical Issues in Israeli Society, ed. Dowty, Alan, 5567. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Barzilai, Gad. 2007. The Ambivalent Voice of Lawyers as Political Actors: Between Liberal Politics, Liberal Economics, and Dissent. In Political Lawyering, Judiciaries, and Political Liberalism, ed. Feeley, Malcolm, Halliday, Terry, and Karpik, Lucien, 247–79. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1961. The Supreme Court: 1960 Term—Forward: The Passive Virtues. Harvard Law Review 75 (1): 40244.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1970. The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. 1986. Neither the Purse nor the Sword: The Dynamics of Public Confidence in the United States Supreme Court. American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1209–26.Google Scholar
Choper, Jesse H. 1980. Judicial Review and the National Political Process: A Functional Reconsideration of the Role of the Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cole, David. 2003. Judging the Next Emergency: Judicial Review and Individual Rights in Times of Crisis. Michigan Law Review 101 (8): 2565–95.Google Scholar
Davidov, Guy. 2001. The Paradox of Judicial Deference. National Journal of Constitutional Law 12 (2): 133–64.Google Scholar
Dotan, Yoav. 1999. Judicial Rhetoric, Government Lawyers and Human Rights: The Case of the Israeli High Court of Justice during the Intifada. Law & Society Review 33 (2): 401–45.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 1997. The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy. In The Province of Administrative Law, ed. Taggart, Michael, 279307. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 2006. The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 2007. Deference, Security and Human Rights. In Security and Human Rights, ed. Goold, Benjamin J. and Lazarus, Liora, 125–56. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, Hunt, Murray, and Taggart, Michael. 2001. The Principle of Legality in Administrative Law: Internationalisation as Constitutionalisation. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 1 (1): 534.Google Scholar
Edelman, Martin. 1994. Courts, Politics, and Culture in Israel. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Ho, Daniel E., King, Gary, and Segal, Jeffrey A. 2005. The Supreme Court during Crisis: How War Affects Only Non‐war Cases. New York University Law Review 80 (1): 1116.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm, and Rubin, Edward. 1998. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed American Prisons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1978. The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. Harvard Law Review 92 (2): 353409.Google Scholar
Gross, Aeyal M. 2007. Human Proportions: Are Human Rights the Emperor's New Clothes of the International Law of Occupation? European Journal of International Law 18 (1): 135.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren. 2003. Chaos and Rules: Should Responses to Violent Crises Always be Constitutional? Yale Law Journal 112 (5): 1011–134.Google Scholar
Gross, Oren, and Ní Aoláin, Fionnauala. 2001. From Discretion to Scrutiny: Revisiting the Application of the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the Context of Article 15 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 23 (3): 625–49.Google Scholar
Gunther, Gerald. 1964. The Subtle Vices of the “Passive Virtues”: A Comment on Principle and Expediency in Judicial Review. Columbia Law Review 64 (1): 125.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Walton H., and Braden, George D. 1941. The Special Competence of the Supreme Court. Yale Law Journal 50 (8): 1319–75.Google Scholar
Hunt, Murray. 2003. Sovereignty's Blight: Why Contemporary Public Law Needs the Concept of “Due Deference.” In Public Law in a Multi‐layered Constitution, ed. Bamforth, Nicholas and Leyland, Peter, 337–70. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Imseis, Ardi. 2001. “Moderate” Torture on Trial: Critical Reflections on the Israeli Supreme Court Judgment Concerning the Legality of the General Security Service Interrogation Methods. International Journal of Human Rights 5 (3): 7196.Google Scholar
Kavanagh, Aileen. 2008. Deference or Defiance? The Limits of the Judicial Role in Constitutional Adjudication. In Expounding the Constitution: Essays in Constitutional Theory, ed. Huscroft, Grant, 184216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kimmerling, Baruch. 1983. Making Conflict a Routine: The Cumulative Effects of the Arab‐Jewish Conflict upon Israeli Society. Journal of Strategic Studies 6 (3): 1345.Google Scholar
King, Jeff A. 2008. Institutional Approaches to Judicial Restraint. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (3): 409–41.Google Scholar
Kretzmer, David. 1993. Bikoret Bagatz Al Harisatam ve‐Atimatam Shel Batim ba‐Shtachim [Judicial Review over Demolition and Sealing of Houses in the Occupied Territories.] In Sefer Klinghoffer Al ha‐Mishpat ha‐Tsiburi [Klinghoffer Book on Public Law], ed. Zamir, Itzhak, 305–57. Jerusalem: Sacher Institute.Google Scholar
Kretzmer, David. 2002. The Occupation of Justice: The Supreme Court of Israel and the Occupied Territories. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lichtman, Steven B. 2006. The Justices and the Generals: A Critical Examination of the U.S. Supreme Court's Tradition of Deference to the Military, 1918–2004. Maryland Law Review 65:907–65.Google Scholar
Ní Aoláin, Fionnauala, and Gross, Oren. 2008. A Skeptical View of Deference to the Executive in Times of Crisis. Israel Law Review 41:545–61.Google Scholar
Nonet, Phillippe, and Selznick, Philip. 2001. Law & Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
O'Connor, John F. 2000. The Origin and Application of the Military Deference Doctrine. Georgia Law Review 35:161311.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J. 1994. The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and Vermeule, Adrian. 2007. Terror in the Balance: Security, Liberty and the Courts. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rehnquist, William H. 1998. All the Laws but One: Civil Liberties in Wartime. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Reichman, Amnon. 2001. “When We Sit to Judge We Are Being Judged”: The Israeli GSS Case, Ex Parte Pinochet and Domestic/Global Deliberation. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 9:41103.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, Stephen. 2006. The Judicial Role in National Security. Boston University Law Review 86 (5): 1309–13.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1992. Judicial Independence and the Reality of Political Power. Review of Politics 54 (3): 369–98.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim. 2004. Law in a Time of Emergency: States of Exception and the Temptations of 9/11. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 6 (5): 1001–83.Google Scholar
Scheindlin, Shira A., and Schwartz, Matthew L. 2004. With All Due Deference: Judicial Responsibility in a Time of Crisis. Hofstra Law Review 32:1605–62.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen. 1990. “Landmark Cases” and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel's High Court of Justice. Law & Society Review 24 (3): 781806.Google Scholar
Stone, Geoffrey R. 2006. Civil Liberties v. National Security in the Law's Open Areas. Boston University Law Review 86 (5): 1315–34.Google Scholar
Sultany, Nimer. 2007. The Legacy of Justice Aharon Barak: A Critical Review. Harvard International Law Journal Online 48:8392.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2003. Defending Korematsu? Reflections on Civil Liberties in Wartime. Wisconsin Law Review 2003 (2): 273307.Google Scholar
Vigoda‐Gadot, E., and Mizrahi, S. 2006. Bitzuey ha‐Migzar ha‐Tziburi be‐Israel: Nituach Emdot Leumi ve [The Performance of the Israeli Public Sector: A Citizens Survey and National Assessment.] Division of Public Administration and Policy, School of Political Sciences, University of Haifa, Research Paper No. 6.Google Scholar
Yoo, John C. 2006. Courts at War. Cornell Law Review 91 (2): 573601.Google Scholar
Young, Alison L. 2009. In Defence of Due Deference. Modern Law Review 72 (4): 554–80.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Abu‐Dahar v. IDF Military Commander in Judea and Samaria, PD 59(5) 368 (2005).Google Scholar
Ajuri v. IDF Military Commander in the West Bank, PD 56(6) 352 (2002).Google Scholar
Azoun City Council Chair v. Government of Israel, judgment of June 15, 2006.Google Scholar
Ganimat v. State of Israel, 49(4) 589 (1995).Google Scholar
Public Committee against Torture in Israel v. Government of Israel, PD 53(4) 817 (1999).Google Scholar
Surik Village Council v. Government of Israel, PD 58(5) 807 (2004)Google Scholar