Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:17:26.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction to Symposium on “Critical Legal Histories”: Robert W. Gordon. 1984. Critical Legal Histories. Stanford Law Review 36:57–125

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Hendrik Hartog
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This introduction to a symposium on Robert Gordon's classic article “Critical Legal Histories” (1984) suggests that the article should be read in the first instance as a response to the distinctive historical and jurisprudential currents of the 1980s, even as it also remains a work that continues to challenge legal historians working today, a generation later.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , Winter 2012 , pp. 147 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gordon, R. W. 1975. J. Willard Hurst and the Common Law Tradition in American Legal Historiography. Law and Society Review 10:9–44.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. W. 1984. Critical Legal Histories. Stanford Law Review 36:57–125.Google Scholar
Hartog, H. 1994. Snakes in Ireland: A Conversation with Willard Hurst. Law and History Review 12 (2): 370–90.Google Scholar
Horwitz, M. 1977. The Transformation of American Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hurst, J. W. 1964. Law and Economic Growth: The Legal History of the Lumber Industry in Wisconsin, 1836–1915. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Macaulay, S. 1963. Non‐Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study. American Sociological Review 28:1–19.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. 1979. The Horwitz Thesis and the History of Contracts. University of Chicago Law Review 46 (3): 533–601 Google Scholar
Trubek, D. M. 1984. Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism. Stanford Law Review 36:575–622.Google Scholar
Yngvesson, B. 1997. Negotiating Motherhood: Identity and Difference in “Open” Adoptions. Law and Society Review 31 (1): 31–80.Google Scholar