Akard, Patrick J. 1992. Corporate Mobilization and Political Power: The Transformation of U.S. Economic Policy in the 1970s. American Sociological Review 57:597–615.Google Scholar

Alexander, Gregory S. 1997. Commodity and Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought, 1776–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Balkin, J. M. 1990. Some Realism about Pluralism: Legal Realist Approaches to the First Amendment. Duke Law Journal (1990): 375–430.Google Scholar

Barenberg, Mark. 1993. The Political Economy of the Wagner Act: Power, Symbol, and Workplace Cooperation. Harvard Law Review 106:1379–1496.Google Scholar

Bell, Daniel. 1960. The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar

Bentley, Arthur F. 1908. The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. 1928. Studies in the Law of Corporation Finance. Chicago: Callaghan and Company.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. 1931. Corporate Powers as Powers in Trust. Harvard Law Review 44:1049–74.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. 1932. For Whom Corporate Managers Are Trustees: A Note. Harvard Law Review 45:1365–72.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. 1952. The Developing Law of Corporate Concentration. University of Chicago Law Review 19:639–61.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. 1954. The 20th Century Capitalist Revolution. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. 1960. Foreword. In Mason 1960, ix–xv.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. 1962. Modem Functions of the Corporate System. Columbia Law Review 62:433–49.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. 1965. Property, Production, and Revolution. Columbia Law Review 65:1–20.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. 1967a. Power. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A. 1967b. Property, Production and Revolution: A Preface to the Revised Edition. In Berle and Means 1968, vii–xxvii.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A., and Gardiner, C. Means. 1930. Corporations and the Public Investor. American Economic Review 20:54–71.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A., and Gardiner, C. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Berle, Adolf A., and Gardiner, C. Means. 1968. The Modern Corporation and Private Property Rev. edition. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar

Berle, Beatrice Bishop, and Travis, Beal Jacobs, eds. 1973. Navigating the Rapids, 1918. 1971: From the Papers of Adolf A. Berle. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Blumberg, Phillip I. 1972. Corporate Responsibility in a Changing Society: Essays on Corporate Social Responsibility. Boston: Boston University School of Law.Google Scholar

Bowman, Scott R. 1996. The Modern Corporation and American Political Thought: Law, Power, and Ideology. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Bratton, William W. 1989a. The New Economic Theory of the Firm: Critical Perspectives from History. Stanford Law Review 41:1471–1527.Google Scholar

Bratton, William W. 1989b. The “Nexus of Contracts” Corporation: A Critical Appraisal. Cornell Law Review 74:407–65.Google Scholar

Bratton, William W. Jr. 2001. Berle and Means Reconsidered at the Century's Turn, Journal of Corporation Law 26:737–70.Google Scholar

Brinkley, Alan. 1989. The New Deal and the Idea of the State. In Fraser and Gerstle 1989, 85–121.Google Scholar

Brinkley, Alan. 1995. The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Brudney, Victor. 1997. Contract and Fiduciary Duty in Corporate Law. Boston College Law Review 38:595–665.Google Scholar

Butler, Henry N. 1989. The Contractual Theory of the Corporation. George Mason University Law Review 11:99–123.Google Scholar

Butler, Henry N., and Harry, E. Ribstein. 1990. Opting Out of Fiduciary Duties: Response to the Anti-contractarians. Washington Law Review 65:1–72.Google Scholar

Carver, Thomas N. 1925. The Present Economic Revolution in the United States. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Chayes, Abram. 1960. The Modern Corporation and the Rule of Law. In Mason 1960, 25–45.Google Scholar

Coase, Ronald H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica 4:386–405.Google Scholar

Coffee, John C 1989. The Mandatory/Enabling Balance in Corporate Law: An Essay on the Judicial Role. Columbia Law Review 89:1618–92.Google Scholar

Cohen, Morris R. 1927. Property and Sovereignty. Cornell Law Quarterly 13:8–30.Google Scholar

Columbia, Law Review. 1989. Symposium: Contractual Freedom in Corporate Law. Columbia Law Review 89:1395–1775.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A. 1959. Business and Politics: A Critical Appraisal of Political Science. In Robert, A. Dahl Mason Haire, and Paul, F. Lazarsfeld eds. Social Science Research on Business: Product and Potential. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, A., Mason, Haire, and Paul, F. Lazarsfeld. 1967. Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Demsetz, Harold. 1983. The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Law and Economics 26:375–90.Google Scholar

Dewey, John. 1927. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar

Dodd, Merrick E. 1932. For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees Harvard Law Review 45:1145–63.Google Scholar

Dodd, Merrick E. 1942. Book Review: Bureaucracy and Trusteeship in Large Corporations by Marshall E. Dimock. University of Chicago Law Review 9:538–49.Google Scholar

Dudziak, Mary L. 2001. Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, Frank H., and Daniel, R. Fischel. 1983. Voting in Corporate Law. Journal of Law and Economics 26:395–427.Google Scholar

Easterbrook, Frank H., and Daniel, R. Fischel. 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, Avigail I. 1995. Reconstructing Political Pluralism. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Ernst, Daniel R. 1993. Common Laborers? Industrial Pluralists, Legal Realists, and the Law of Industrial Disputes, 1915–1943. Law and History Review 11:59–100.Google Scholar

Fama, Eugene F., and Michael, C. Jensen. 1983a. Agency Problems and Residual Claims. Journal of Law and Economics 26:327–49.Google Scholar

Fama, Eugene F., and Michael, C. Jensen. 1983b. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics 26:301–25.Google Scholar

Follett, Mary Parker. 1918. The New State: Group Organization the Solution of Popular Government. New York: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar

Follett, Mary Parker. 1924. Creative Experience. New York: Longmans, Green and co.Google Scholar

Follett, Mary Parker. 1925. Power. In Metcalf and Urwick 1942.Google Scholar

Forbath, William E. 2000. Civil Rights and Economic Citizenship: Notes on the Past and Future of the Civil Rights and Labor Movements. University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law 2:697–718.Google Scholar

Forbath, William E. 2001. The New Deal Constitution in Exile. Duke Law Journal 51:165–222.Google Scholar

Frank, Jerome. 1933. Book Review: The Modem Corporation and Private Property Yale Law Journal 42:989–1000.Google Scholar

Fraser, Steve, and Gary, Gerstle, eds. 1989. The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, 1930–1980. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Friedlander, Joel Edan. 1996. Corporation and Kulturkampf: Time Culture as Illegal Fiction. Connecticut Law Review 29:31–115.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, Milton. 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times, Sept. 13.Google Scholar

Galbraith, John Kenneth. 1952. American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Genovese, Eugene D. 1997. Secularism in the General Crisis of Capitalism. American Journal of Jurisprudence 42:195–210.Google Scholar

Glasberg, Davita Silfen, and Michael, Schwartz. 1983. Ownership and Control of Corporations. Annual Review of Sociology 9:311–32.Google Scholar

Goluboff, Risa L. 2001. The Thirteenth Amendment and the Lost Origins of Civil Rights. Duke Law Journal 50:1609–85.Google Scholar

Gordon, Jeffrey N. 1989. The Mandatory Structure of Corporate Law. Columbia Law Review 89:1549–99.Google Scholar

Gordon, Robert W. 1995. Legal Realism. In Richard, Wightman Fox and James, T. Kloppenberg, eds., A Companion to American Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Graham, Pauline, ed. 1995. Mary Parker Follett: Prophet of Management. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Hager, Mark M. 1989. Bodies Politic: The Progressive History of Organizational “Real Entity” Theory. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 50:575–654.Google Scholar

Hale, Robert L. 1923. Coercion and Distribution in a Supposedly Non-coercive State. Political Science Quarterly 38:470–94.Google Scholar

Hawley, Ellis W. 1979. The Great War and the Search for Modem Order: A History of the American People and their institutions, 1917–1933. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Hessen, Robert. 1983. The Modern Corporation and Private Property: A Reappraisal. Journal of Law and Economics 26:273–289.Google Scholar

Hirst, Paul Q. ed. 1989. The Pluralist Theory of the State: Selected Writings of G. D. H. Cole, J. N. Figgis, and H. J. Laski. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Horwitz, Morton J. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870–1960: The Crisis of Legal Orthodoxy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert. 1988. The Classical Corporation in American Legal Thought. Georgetown Law Journal 76:1593–1689.Google Scholar

Hovenkamp, Herbert. 2000. Knowledge about Welfare: Legal Realism and the Separation of Law and Economics. Minnesota Law Review 84:805–62.Google Scholar

Isaacs, Nathan. 1933. Book Review: The Modem Corporation and Private Property Yale Law Journal 42:463–65.Google Scholar

Israels, Carlos L. 1964. Are Corporate Powers Still Held in Trust Columbia Law Review 64:1446–57.Google Scholar

Jaffe, Louis L. 1937. Law Making by Private Groups. Harvard Law Review 51:201–53.Google Scholar

Journal of Law and Economics. 1983. Conference: Corporations and Private Property (sponsored by the Hoover Institution). Journal of Law and Economics 26:235–496.Google Scholar

Kariel, Henry S. 1961. The Decline of American Pluralism. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Katz, Wilber G. 1958. The Philosophy of Midcentury Corporation Statutes. Law and Contemporary Problems 23:171–92.Google Scholar

Kitch, Edmund W., ed. 1983. The Fire of Truth: A Remembrance of Law and Economics at Chicago 1932–1970 (a transcript of a discussion held March 21–23, 1981, in Los Angeles). Journal of Law and Economics 26:163–234.Google Scholar

Kline, Joseph V. 1933. Book Review: The Modern Corporation and Private Property Columbia Law Review 33:557–60.Google Scholar

Kolko, Gabriel. 1963. The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900–1916. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Laski, Harold J. 1916. The Personality of Associations. Harvard Law Review 29:404–26.Google Scholar

Laski, Harold J. 1917. Studies in the Problem of Sovereignty. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Laski, Harold J. 1918. The Problem of Administrative Areas. Smith College Studies in History. Northampton, Mass.: Department of History at Smith College.Google Scholar

Laski, Harold J. 1925. A Grammar of Politics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Latham, Earl. 1952. The Group Basis of Politics: A Study in Basing-Point Legislation. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Lustig, Jeffrey R. 1982. Corporate Liberalism: The Origins of Modem American Political Theory, 1890–1920. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Manne, Henry G. 1962. The “Higher Criticism” of the Modern Corporation. Columbia Law Review 62:399–432.Google Scholar

Manning, Bayless. 1958. Book Review: The American Stockholder, by J. A. Livingston. Yak Law]oumal 67:1477–96.Google Scholar

Mark, Gregory A. 1987. The Personification of the Business Corporation in American Law. University of Chicago Law Review 54:1441–83.Google Scholar

Mason, Edward S., ed. 1960. The Corporation in Modem Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McCraw, Thomas K. 1990. In Retrospect: Berle and Means. Reviews in American History. 18:578–96.Google Scholar

Means, Gardiner C. 1935. The Distribution of Control and Responsibility in a Modern Economy. Political Science Quarterly 50:59–69.Google Scholar

Means, Gardiner C. 1967. Implications of the Corporate Revolution in Economic Theory. In Berle and Means 1968, xxix–xxxviii.Google Scholar

Means, Gardiner C. 1983a. Corporate Power in the Marketplace. Journal of Law and Economics 26:467–85.Google Scholar

Means, Gardiner C. 1983b. Hessen's “Reappraisal.” Journal of Law and Economics 26:297–300.Google Scholar

Metcalf, Henry C, and Urwick, L., eds. 1942. Dynamic Administration: The Collected Papers of Mary Parker Follett. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar

Miller, Arthur Selwyn. 1976. The Modern Corporate State: Private Governments and the American Constitution. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar

Millon, David. 1990. Theories of the Corporation. Duke Law Journal 1990:201–62.Google Scholar

Mills, Wright C. 1956. The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Lawrence E. 2001. Corporate Irresponsibility: America's Newest Export. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Moore, Thomas Gale. 1983. Introduction. Journal of Law and Economics 26:235–36.Google Scholar

Novak, William. 1996. The People's Welfare: Law and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

O'Melinn, Liam S. 2000. The Sanctity of Association: The Corporation and Individualism in American Law. San Diego Law Review 37:101–65.Google Scholar

Pells, Richard H. 1989. The Liberal Mind in a Conservative Age: American Intellectuals in the 1940s and 1950s. 2nd ed. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Phillips, Michael 1989. Freedom in Miller's Corporate State. George Washington Law Review 57:1533–55.Google Scholar

Pope, James Gray. 2002. The Thirteenth Amendment versus the Commerce Clause: Labor and the Shaping of American Constitutional Law, 1921–1957. Columbia Law Review 102:1–122.Google Scholar

Purcell, Edward A. 1973. The Crisis of Democratic Theory: Scientific Naturalism and the Problem of Value. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar

Reich, Charles A. 1964- The New Property. Yale Law Journal 73:733–87. Ricardo-Campbell, Rita. 1983. Comments on the Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Law and Economics 26:391–93.Google Scholar

Ripley, William Z. 1927. Main Street and Wall Street. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar

Roe, Mark. 1994. Strong Managers, Weak Owners: The Political Roots of American Corporate Finance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rostow, Eugene V. 1960. To Whom and for What Ends Is Corporate Management Responsible? In Mason 1960, 46–71.Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael J. 1998. Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of Public Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Schiller, Reuel E. 1999. From Group Rights to Individual Liberties: Post-War Labor Law, Liberalism, and the Waning of Union Strength. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law 20:1–73.Google Scholar

Schneiderman, David. 1998. Harold Laski, Viscount Haldane, and the Law of the Canadian Constitution in the Early-Twentieth Century. University of Toronto Law Journal 48:521–60.Google Scholar

Schwarz, Jordan A. 1987. Liberal: Adolf A. Berle and the Vision of an American Era. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Singer, Joseph W. 1988. Legal Realism Now. California Law Review 76:465–544.Google Scholar

Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Emergence of National Administrative Capacities, 1877–1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sommer, A. A. Jr. 1991. Whom Should the Corporation Serve? The Berle-Dodd Debate Revisited Sixty Years Later. Delaware Journal of Corporate Law 16:33–56.Google Scholar

Stewart, Richard B. 1987. Organizational Jurisprudence. Harvard Law Review 101:371–90.Google Scholar

Stigler, George J., and Claire, Friedland. 1983. The Literature of Economics: The Case of Berle and Means. Journal of Law and Economics 26:237–68.Google Scholar

Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1835. Democracy in America. Trans. Reeve, Henry. London: Saunders and Otley.Google Scholar

Tsuk, Dalia. 2001a. Pluralisms: The Indian New Deal as a Model. Margins: Maryland's Interdisciplinary Journal of Race, Class and Gender 1:393–449.Google Scholar

Tsuk, Dalia. 2001b. The New Deal Origins of American Legal Pluralism. Florida State University Law Review 29:189–268.Google Scholar

Tsuk, Dalia. 2002a. ”A Double Runner”: Felix S. Cohen and the Indian New Deal. Political and Legal Anthropolgy Review 25:48–68.Google Scholar

Tsuk, Dalia. 2002b. Legal Realism. In Herbert, M. Kritzer, ed., Legal Systems of the World: A Political, Social, and Cultural Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar

Tsuk, Dalia. 2003. Corporations without Labor: The Politics of Progressive Corporate Law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151:1861–1912.Google Scholar

Veblen, Thorstein. 1923. Absentee Ownership and Business Enterprise in Recent Times. New York: B. W. Huebsch.Google Scholar

Warren, William C. 1964. Adolf A. Berle. Columbia Law Review 64:1377–85.Google Scholar

Weiner, Joseph L. 1952. The New Deal and the Corporation. University of Chicago Law Review 19:724–38.Google Scholar

Weiner, Joseph L. 1969. The Berle-Dodd Dialogue on the Concept of the Corporation. Columbia Law Review 64:1458–67.Google Scholar

Weiss, Elliott J. 1984. Economic Analysis, Corporate Law, and the ALI Corporate Governance Project. Cornell Law Review 70:1–72.Google Scholar

Weiss, Leonard W. 1983. The Extent and Effects of Aggregate Concentration. Journal of Law and Economics 26:429–55.Google Scholar

Williamson, Oliver E. 1983. Organization Form, Residual Claimants, and Corporate Control. Journal of Law and Economics 26:351–66.Google Scholar

Wilson, Woodrow. 1910. The Lawyer and the Community. A.B.A. Reporter 35:419–39.Google Scholar

Wormser, Maurice. 1931. Frankenstein, Incorporated. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Whittlesey House.Google Scholar

Wren, Daniel A. 1987. The Evolution of Management Thought 3rd ed. New York: Wiley Series in Management.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, Maurice. 1974. Corporate Ownership and Control: The Large Corporation and the Capitalist Class. American Journal of Sociology 79:1073–1119.Google Scholar