No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Searching for a New Formula: Brazilian Political Economy in Reform
Review products
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2022
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0023879100007561/resource/name/firstPage-S0023879100007561a.jpg)
- Type
- Review Essays
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2007 by the University of Texas Press
References
1. See Peter Kingstone and Timothy Power, Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1999).
2. For more on Cardoso's view on his experience with agrarian reform, see his recently published memoir: Fernando Henrique Cardoso, A arte da política: A historia que vivi (Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2006), 529–41.
3. Others have made fruitful comparisons between the Brazilian and South African political economies; for example, see Gay Seidman, Manufacturing Militance: Workers Movements in Brazil and South Africa, 1970–1985 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).
4. See, for example, Kathryn Sikkink's description of developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina in the 1950s, in her book Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991).
5. Peter Evans, Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979).
6. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada, http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/ipeaweb.dll/ipeadata?115960437 (accessed on March 17, 2006).
7. Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom (New York: Anchor Books, 2000).