Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T17:28:02.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Public Security Forces with Private Funding: Local Army Entrepreneurship in Peru and Ecuador

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Maiah Jaskoski
Maiah Jaskoski*
Affiliation:
Naval Postgraduate School
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In Latin America's young democracies, actors in the private sector may influence military security work through resource transfers, with implications for state accountability and democracy in the region. This analysis finds that in Ecuador and Peru local army commanders—who frequently decide when and where army operations are conducted—make decisions not according to technical evaluations of security requirements but rather on the basis of how much local clients pay. The article's local political economy perspective enables us to identify client influence, even in cases in which client and national security interests overlap. The study also helps bridge two literatures: research on Latin American civil-military relations, which has devoted a great amount of attention to military autonomy vis-à-vis the government without systematically analyzing third-party influence on armed forces, and scholarship on security privatization, which has examined such third-party financing but without underscoring the fact that clients can engage with the military directly, bypassing the national government.

Resumo

Resumo

En las nuevas democracias latinoamericanas, los actores del sector privado pueden influir en el trabajo de seguridad militar, a través de la transferencia de recursos, con implicaciones para la responsabilidad estatal y la democracia regional. El presente análisis encuentra que en Ecuador y en el Perú, comandantes locales del ejército —quienes deciden directamente cuándo y dónde se realizan operaciones militares— no toman decisiones de acuerdo con las evaluaciones técnicas de los requisitos de seguridad, sino basadas en el monto que pagan los clientes locales. Centrándose en la economía política local, este artículo nos permite identificar la influencia de los clientes, incluso en casos de beneficio mutuo para los clientes y la seguridad nacional. El estudio ofrece un vínculo entre dos discursos académicos: investigaciones sobre las relaciones cívico-militares latinoamericanas, que se han enfocado en la autonomía militar en relación con el gobierno, sin analizar sistemáticamente la influencia de terceros sobre las fuerzas armadas; e investigaciones sobre la privatización de seguridad, que han examinado el financiamiento por terceros sin considerar que los clientes pueden contratar a esas fuerzas directamente, sobrepasando al gobierno nacional.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , 2012 , pp. 79 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

I thank Kent Eaton, J. Samuel Fitch, Candelaria Garay, Stephanie McNulty, Arturo Sotomayor, Harold Trinkunas, Zach Zwald, members of the Transnational and Local Dynamics in the Andes Research Cluster of the Chicano Latino Research Center at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and the three anonymous LARR reviewers for their exceptionally helpful feedback on earlier versions of this article. This study would not have been possible without the generosity of many individuals in Ecuador and Peru who shared with me their time and views, and for their help I am deeply grateful. Fieldwork was supported by a National Security Education Program David L. Boren Graduate Fellowship and the Naval Postgraduate School Research Initiation Program. The findings presented here are those of the author and do not represent positions of the US Navy, Department of Defense, or government.

References

Agüero, Felipe 1995 Soldiers, Civilians, and Democracy: Post-Franco Spain in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Andrade, Pablo 2002 “Diagnóstico de la frontera Ecuador-Colombia.” Comentario Internacional 4 (semester 2): 189–240.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Craig L. 2001 Bounded Missions: Military Regimes and Democratization in the Southern Cone and Brazil. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah D. 2005 The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, Carla D'Nan, and Forero, Juan 2005 “Amid Tight Oil Markets, Protests Cut Back Output in Ecuador.” New York Times, August 24.Google Scholar
Beltrán, Bolívar, and Oldham, Jim 2005 “Oil Multinationals Privatize the Military in Ecuador.” Synthesis/Regeneration 38 (Fall) (available at http://www.greens.org/s-r/index.html).Google Scholar
Benton, Allyson 2008 “Political Institutions, Hydrocarbons Resources, and Economic Policy Divergence in Latin America.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 28–31.Google Scholar
Comité Especial del Proyecto Camisea, Comisión de Promoción de la Inversión Privada, del Perú, República 2000 Contrato de licencia para la explotación de hidrocarburos en el Lote 88. November 28, Lima (accessed December 19, 2011, at http://www.minem.gob.pe/minem/archivos/contratogas.pdf).Google Scholar
Cruz, Consuelo, and Diamint, Rut 1998 “The New Military Autonomy in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 9 (4): 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollery, Brian, Spindler, Zane, and Parsons, Craig 2004 “Nanshin: Budget-Maximizing Behavior, the Imperial Japanese Navy and the Origins of the Pacific War.” Public Organization Review 4 (2): 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 1985 Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreyra, Aleida, and Segura, Renata 2000 “Examining the Military in the Local Sphere: Colombia and Mexico.” Latin American Perspectives 27 (2): 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, John Samuel 1998 The Armed Forces and Democracy in Latin America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew 2005 Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gerlach, Allen 2003 Indians, Oil, and Politics: A Recent History of Ecuador. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Haugaard, Lisa, Isacson, Adam, and Olson, Joy 2005 “Erasing the Lines: Trends in US Military Programs with Latin America.” December. Washington, DC: Latin America Working Group Education Fund, Center for International Policy, and Washington Office on Latin America.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy 1996 “State and Soldier in Latin America: Redefining the Military's Role in Argentina, Brazil, and Chile.” Peaceworks 10 (October) (accessed at http://www.usip.org/files/resources/pwkslO.pdf).Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy 1997 Eroding Military Influence in Brazil: Politicians against Soldiers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel 1957 The Soldier and the State. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group 2004 “Colombia's Borders: The Weak Link in Uribe's Security Policy.” Latin America Report no. 9 (September 23). Quito and Brussels: International Crisis Group.Google Scholar
Isaacs, Anita 1993 Military Rule and Transition in Ecuador, 1972–92. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarrín Roman, Oswaldo R. 2001 “Directiva No. 2001–13 para el cumplimiento del convenio de cooperación de seguridad militar entre el Ministerio de Defensa Nacional y las empresas petroleras que operan en la región amazónica.” Quito.Google Scholar
Jaskoski, Maiah 2008 “Mission Impossible? Military Politics in Peru and Ecuador.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Jaskoski, Maiah 2012 “The Ecuadorian Army: Neglecting a Porous Border While Policing the Interior.” Latin American Politics and Society 54 (1): 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimerling, Judith 2006 “Indigenous Peoples and the Oil Frontier in Amazonia: The Case of Ecuador, ChevronTexaco, and Aguinda v. Texaco.” International Law and Politics 38:413–664.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred 1996 Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Loveman, Brian 1999 For La Patria: Politics and the Armed Forces in Latin America. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.Google Scholar
Mani, Kristina 2007 “Militaries in Business: State-Making and Entrepreneurship in the Developing World.” Armed Forces and Society 33 (4): 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mani, Kristina 2011 “Military Entrepreneurs: Patterns in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 53 (3): 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClintock, Cynthia 1998 Revolutionary Movements in Latin America: El Salvador's FMLN and Peru's Shining Path. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
McClintock, Cynthia 2005 “The Evolution of Internal War in Peru: The Conjunction of Need, Creed, and Organizational Finance.” In Rethinking the Economics of War: The Intersection of Need, Creed, and Greed, edited by Arnson, Cynthia J. and Zartman, I. William, 52–83. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ministerio de Defensa Nacional, Ecuador 2001 “Convenio de cooperación de seguridad militar entre el Ministerio de Defensa Nacional y las empresas petrleras [sic] que operan en el Ecuador.” Quito: Ministerio de Defensa Nacional.Google Scholar
Montúfar, César 2003 “El Ecuador entre el Plan Colombia y la Iniciativa Andina: Del enfoque de los ‘efectos’ a una perspectiva de regionalización.” In Turbulencia en los Andes y Plan Colombia, edited by Montúfar, César and Whitfield, Teresa, 205–234. Quito: Centro Andino de Estudios Internacionales, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar Ecuador.Google Scholar
Narcotics Affairs Section, US Department of State 2005 “Project Budgets, 2001–04.” Quito: US Department of State.Google Scholar
Norden, Deborah L. 1996 Military Rebellion in Argentina: Between Coups and Consolidation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Perelli, Carina, and Rial, Juan 1996 “Changing Military World Views: The Armed Forces of South America in the 1990s.” In Beyond Praetorianism: The Latin American Military in Transition, edited by Millett, Richard L. and Gold-Biss, Michael, 59–82. Miami: North-South Center Press, University of Miami.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David 1997 Through Corridors of Power: Institutions and Civil-Military Relations in Argentina. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, and Arceneaux, Craig 2000 “Decision-Makers or Decision-Takers? Military Missions and Civilian Control in Democratic South America.” Armed Forces and Society 26 (3): 413–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rial, Juan 1996 “Armies and Civil Society in Latin America.” In Civil-Military Relations and Democracy, edited by Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F., 47–65. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Richani, Nazih 2005 “Multinational Corporations, Rentier Capitalism, and the War System in Colombia.” Latin American Politics and Society 47 (3): 113–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robles Montoya, José 2003 “Metodología de análisis para la asignación de recursos de la defensa: Presupuestos y adquisiciones.” In Transparencia y eficiencia en gastos para la defensa, by Suárez, Gustavo, Hernández, Wilson, and Robles, José, 121–189. Lima: Instituto de Defensa Legal.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Suzana 2004 Crude Chronicles: Indigenous Politics, Multinational Oil, and Neoliberalism in Ecuador. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Soberón Garrido, Ricardo 2006 “Listado de bases antisubversivas en el Perú.” Lima.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred 1971 The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred 1973 “The New Professionalism of Internal Warfare and Military Role Expansion.” In Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, Policies, and Future, edited by Stepan, Alfred, 47–65. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred 1978 The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred 1988 Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trinkunas, Harold A. 2005 Crafting Civilian Control of the Military in Venezuela: A Comparative Perspective. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdivia, Gabriela 2008 “Governing Relations between People and Things: Citizenship, Territory, and the Political Economy of Petroleum in Ecuador.” Political Geography 27 (4): 456–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, Michael J. 2005 “Righteous Oil? Human Rights, the Oil Complex, and Corporate Social Responsibility.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30 (November): 373–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, Gregory 2003 The Military and Politics in Postauthoritarian Chile. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Wintrobe, Ronald 1990 “The Tinpot and the Totalitarian: An Economic Theory of Dictatorship.” American Political Science Review 84 (3): 849–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wirpsa, Leslie, and Dunning, Thad 2004 “Oil and the Political Economy of Conflict in Colombia and Beyond: A Linkages Approach.” Geopolitics 9 (1): 81–108.Google Scholar
Youngers, Coletta A., and Rosin, Eileen, eds. 2005 Drugs and Democracy in Latin America: The Impact of US Policy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Zisk, Kimberly Marten 1993 Engaging the Enemy: Organization Theory and Soviet Military Innovation, 1955–1991. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar