Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T11:06:42.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Contours of Party Patronage in Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

Gerardo Scherlis
Gerardo Scherlis*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Buenos Aires and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Studies on the Argentine public administration have usually underlined the weakness of Argentine state bureaucracies. On the basis of these assertions, scholars have tended to equate the number of state jobs with cases of patronage. By doing so, they have neglected the crucial issue of the scope of appointments effectively controlled by political parties. This article applies an innovative empirical inquiry to measure the extent of party patronage, assessing where, how deeply, and to what extent parties reach into the Argentine federal state structures. While the results by and large confirm the widespread notion of the broad scope of political appointments in Argentina, they refute the conventional hypothesis of a state thoroughly colonized by parties. Overall, the results suggest that parties' distribution of public jobs in the Argentine federal state is oriented less to mass-style patronage than to gaining effective and broad control over state institutions.

Resumo

Resumo

Los estudios sobre la administración pública argentina suelen destacar la debilidad de las burocracias estatales. Sobre esta base, resulta habitual encontrar trabajos académicos en los que el número de empleos públicos se asimila al número de casos de patronazgo. De este modo se ha desatendido la cuestión crucial del alcance de las designaciones efectivamente bajo control de los partidos políticos. Este artículo se vale de una metodología novedosa para medir la extensión del patronazgo partidario, estableciendo dónde, cuán profundamente, y con qué extensión los partidos penetran las estructuras del estado federal argentino. Mientras por un lado los resultados confirman la noción de un amplio alcance de las designaciones políticas en Argentina, ellos también refutan la hipótesis convencional de un estado completamente colonizado por los partidos. Los resultados sugieren finalmente que la asignación de empleos por parte de los partidos en el estado federal argentino está menos orientada a un patronazgo de masas que a lograr un control amplio y efectivo sobre las instituciones estatales.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , 2013 , pp. 63 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 by the Latin American Studies Association

Footnotes

I am grateful to Peter Mair for his inspiration, guidance, and support. I also wish to thank the three anonymous LARR reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.

References

Aberbach, Joel D., and Rockman, Bert A. 1994 “Civil Servants and Policymakers: Neutral or Responsive Competence?” Governance 7 (4): 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambaci, Juliana, Spiller, Pablo, and Tommasi, Mariano 2007 “The Bureaucracy.” In Spiller, Pablo T. and Tommasi, Mariano, The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy in Argentina, 151–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biezen, Ingrid van 2004 “Political Parties as Public Utilities.” Party Politics 10 (6): 701–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria 2004 “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 742–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camou, Antonio 2007 “El saber detrás del trono: Intelectuales-expertos, tanques de pensamiento y políticas económicas en la Argentina democrática 1985-2001.” In Think Tanks y políticas públicas en Latinoamérica, edited by Garcé, Adolfo and Uña, Gerardo, 139–176. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
Dalbosco, Hugo Luis 2003 “Crisis de representatividad y burocracia en la Argentina.” Colección, no. 14: 99–123.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Wattenberg, Martin P. 2002 Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Kent 2003 “Can Politicians Control Bureaucrats? Applying Theories of Political Control to Argentina's Democracy.” Latin American Politics and Society 45 (4): 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, Agustín 2006 “Una idea muy precaria: El nuevo servicio civil y los viejos designados políticos en Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 41 (2): 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flinders, Matthew 2009 “The Politics of Patronage in the United Kingdom: Shrinking Reach and Diluted Permeation.” Governance 22 (4): 547–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara 1994 Politician's Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordin, Jorge 2002 “The Political and Partisan Determinants of Patronage in Latin America, 1960-1994: A Comparative Perspective.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (4): 513–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorgal, Diego 2002 “Estado y seguridad: Apuntes para una reformulación del sistema de seguridad interior en la Argentina.” Colección, no. 13:281–369.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen 2005 Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jalali, Carlos, Silva, Patricia, and Moreira, Diogo 2012 “Party Patronage in Portugal: Treading in Shallow Water.” In Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies, edited by Kopecký, Petr, Mair, Peter, and Spirova, Maria, chap. 15. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jordana, Jacint, and Ramió, Carles 2010 “Delegation, Presidential Regimes, and Latin American Regulatory Agencies.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 2 (1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard 1986 “Party Government: A Rationalistic Conception.” In Visions and Realities of Party Government, edited by Castles, Francis G. and Wildenmann, Rudolf, 31–71. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S., and Mair, Peter 1995 “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1 (1): 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemahlioglu, Ozge 2011 “Jobs in Politicians' Backyards: Party Leadership Competition and Patronage.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 23 (4): 480–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, Petr, and Mair, Peter 2012 “Patronage as an Organizational Resource.” In Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies, edited by Kopecký, Petr, Mair, Peter, and Spirova, Maria, 3–16. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, Petr, Mair, Peter, and Spirova, Maria, eds. 2012 Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, Petr, Scherlis, Gerardo, and Spirova, Maria 2008 “Conceptualizing and Measuring Party Patronage.” Working Paper 25, Committee on Concepts and Methods, International Political Science Association, September.Google Scholar
Leiras, Marcelo 2007 Todos los caballos del rey: La integración de los partidos políticos y el gobierno democrático de la Argentina, 1995-2003. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven 2007 “From Populism to Clientelism? The Transformation of Labor-Based Party Linkages in Latin America.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, edited by Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven, 206–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria 2008 “Argentina: From Kirchner to Kirchner.” Journal of Democracy 19 (2): 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, Andrea, and Zeller, Norberto 2006 “La administración pública nacional en Argentina (1983-2001): El impacto de las reformas sobre su estructura y personal.” Revista Argentina de Sociología 4 (6): 129–158.Google Scholar
Minsky, Rafael 2001 “Obstáculos para la profesionalización de la gestión pública.” VI Congreso Internacional del Centro Latinoamericano de Administración para el Desarrollo (CLAD), Buenos Aires, November 5–9.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang 2006 “Party Patronage and Party Colonization of the State.” In Handbook of Party Politics, edited by Katz, Richard S. and Crotty, William J., 189–195. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlansky, Dora 1989 “Empleo público y condiciones de trabajo: Argentina 1960-1986.” Desarrollo Económico 29 (113): 63–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlansky, Dora 2009 “¿Validez de una demostración? Patronazgo y empleo público provincial.” Desarrollo Económico 48 (192): 557–558.Google Scholar
Oszlak, Oscar 1994 “Estado y sociedad: Las nuevas fronteras.” In El rediseño del Estado, edited by Kliksberg, Bernardo, 45–78. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Oszlak, Oscar 1999 “The Argentine Civil Service: An Unfinished Search for Identity.” Research in Public Administration 5:267–326.Google Scholar
Oszlak, Oscar 2003 “El mito del estado mínimo: Una década de reforma estatal en Argentina.” Desarrollo Económico 42 (168): 519–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. Guy 1988 Comparing Public Bureaucracies: Problems of Theory and Method. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Peters, B. Guy, and Pierre, Jon, eds. 2004 Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmer, Karen L. 2007 “The Political Economy of Patronage: Expenditure Patterns in the Argentine Provinces, 1983-2003.” Journal of Politics 69 (2): 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rock, David 2005 “Argentina: A Hundred and Fifty Years of Democratic Praxis.” Latin American Research Review 40: (2): 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, Laura C. 2007 “Acerca de la independencia judicial en Argentina: La creación del Consejo de la Magistratura y su desempeño entre 1994 y 2006.” Desarrollo Económico 47 (186): 285–318.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin 1977 “Party and Patronage: Germany, England and Italy.” Politics and Society 7:403–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorauf, Frank J. 1959 “Patronage and Party.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 3 (2): 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano 2007 The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy in Argentina: A Transactions Cost Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano 2008 “Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes in Argentina.” In Policymaking in.Latin America: How Politics Shapes Policies, edited by Stein, Ernesto and Tommasi, Mariano, with Scartascini, Carlos and Spiller, Pablo, 69–110. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano Paul, Webb, and White, Stephen, eds. 2007 Party Politics in New Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul 2011 “Is the Party Over? The Decline of Party Activism and Membership across the Democratic World.” Party Politics 17 (1): 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar