Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T22:12:57.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community Organization, Migration, and Remittances in Oaxaca

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2022

Leah K. VanWey ,
Catherine M. Tucker  and
Eileen Diaz McConnell
Leah K. VanWey
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Catherine M. Tucker
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Eileen Diaz McConnell
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Researchers studying migration and development have argued over the potential that migration and associated remittances have to improve the economic and social conditions in origin communities. Past research on migration from indigenous communities in Oaxaca has similarly questioned the compatibility of traditional governance systems with high migration rates. We argue, using evidence from four Zapotec communities in rural Oaxaca, that communities can use the organizational capacity of traditional governance systems to access remittances from migrants for the benefit of the community as a whole. Communities can require payment from migrants in lieu of communal labor requirements (tequio) and may directly solicit remittances from migrants for community projects. The extent to which they enforce these requests depends on the existing organizational strength in the community. These findings imply that strong forms of community organization can make the difference between migration contributing to underdevelopment and migration contributing to development.

Resumen

Resumen

Especialistas sobre migración y desarrollo han estudiado el potencial que la migración y sus remesas asociadas brindan al mejoramiento de las condiciones sociales y políticas en las comunidades de origen. Asimismo, estudios previos sobre migración de comunidades indígenas en Oaxaca han cuestionado la compatibilidad de sistemas tradicionales de gobierno y altas tasas de migración. Sobre la base de evidencia de cuatro comunidades zapotecas en la zona rural de Oaxaca, sostenemos que las comunidades pueden utilizar la capacidad institucional de sistemas de gobierno tradicionales para acceder a remesas en favor de la comunidad en general. Las comunidades pueden exigir a los emigrantes pagos en lugar de participar en trabajos comunitarios obligatorios (tequio) y también pueden solicitar remesas a los emigrantes para proyectos comunitarios. El grado hasta el cual las comunidades exigen el cumplimiento de estos requisitos depende de la fuerza organizativa de la comunidad. Los resultados de esta investigación implican que la solidez organizacional puede definir a la migración como beneficiosa o perjudicial para el desarrollo comunitario.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Research Review , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , 2005 , pp. 83 - 107
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the University of Texas Press

Footnotes

∗

Acknowledgements: The authors express thanks to Lilian Marquez-Barrientos and Ever Canul Góngora for their invaluable assistance in the collection of data. They thank the LARR editors and reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions. In addition, they appreciate the similarly valuable comments offered by George Alter, Tim Bartley, Jeffrey Cohen, and Dennis Conway. The research received financial assistance from the College of Arts and Sciences at Indiana University, as well as the Center for the Study of Institutions, Population and Environmental Change (CIPEC) through a National Science Foundation grant (SBR-952191). Finally, and most importantly, the authors thank the people of the study communities; without their generous assistance and cooperation, this research would not have been possible. All errors and opinions remain the authors'.

References

Acheson, James M. 1987 “The Lobster Fiefs Revisited: Economic and Ecological Effects of Territoriality in Maine Lobster Fishing.” In The Question of the Commons, edited by McCay, B. J. and Acheson, J. M., 37–65. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Agrawal, Arun 2000 “Small Is Beautiful, but Is Larger Better? Forest-Management Institutions in the Kumaon Himalaya, India.” In People and Forests: Communities, Institutions and Governance, edited by Gibson, C. C., McKean, M. A. and Ostrom, E., 57–86. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aguilar, Jasmin, and Zapoteco, Albino Tlacotempa 1997 “Organización campesina y manejo de recursos naturales en el trópico seco.” In Semillas para el cambio en el campo: Medio ambiente, mercados y organización campesina, edited by L. Pare, D. B. Bray, J. Burstein and S. Martínez, 155–65. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, UNAM-IIS: Sociedad de Solidaridad Social “Sansekan Tinemi”: Saldebas, Servicios de Apoyo Local al Desarrollo de Base en México.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Luis Rodrigo 1998 Geografía general del Estado de Oaxaca, 3rd edición. Oaxaca: Carteles Editores.Google Scholar
Anta Fonseca, Salvador, Barrera, Antonio Planearte, and Terán, Juan Manuel Barrera, eds. 2000 Conservación y manejo comunitario de los recursos forestales en Oaxaca. Oaxaca: Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP), Delegación Oaxaca, Mexico.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Biswajit 1984 “The Probability, Size, and Uses of Remittances from Urban to Rural Areas in India.” Journal of Development Economics 16 (3): 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Dan 1987 “The Dynamics of Communal and Hereditary Land Tenure Among the Tigray of Ethiopia.” In The Question of the Commons, edited by McCay, B. J. and Acheson, J. M., 217–30. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Behar, Ruth 1986 The Presence of the Past in a Spanish Village: Santa María del Monte. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berkes, Fikret, ed. 1989 Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community-Based Sustainable Development. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
Bray, David Barton, Merino-Perez, Leticia, Negreros-Castillo, Patricia, Segura-Warnholtz, Gerardo, Torres-Rojo, Juan Manuel, and Vester, Henricus F. M. 2003 “Mexico's Community-Managed Forests as a Global Model for Sustainable Landscapes.” Conservation Biology 17 (3): 672–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, Daniel W., ed. 1992 Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice and Policy. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Brouwer, Roland. 1995 “Common Goods and Private Profits: Traditional and Modern Communal Land Management in Portugal.” Human Organization 54 (3): 283–303.Google Scholar
Carabias Lillo, Julia, Cervantes, J. Delvalle, and Warnholtz, Gerardo Segura, eds. 2000 Voces del monte: Experiencias comunitarias para el manejo sustentable de los bosques en Oaxaca. México: Proyecto de Conservación y Manejo Sustentable de Recursos Forestales en México (PROCYMAF), Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP).Google Scholar
Chance, John C. 1989 Conquest of the Sierra: Spaniards and Indians in Colonial Oaxaca. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, Colin 2000 Class, Ethnicity and Community in Southern Mexico: Oaxaca's Peasantries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey H. 1997 “Migration Matters: Household, Community and Transnational Movement in Rural Oaxaca, Mexico.” Paper read at Latin American Studies Association Conference, in Guadalajara, Mexico.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey H. 1999 Cooperation and Community Economy and Society in Oaxaca. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jeffrey H. 2001 “Transnational Migration in Rural Oaxaca, Mexico: Dependency, Development, and the Household.” American Anthropologist 103 (4):954–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, Dennis, and Cohen, Jeffrey H. 1998 “Consequences of Migration and Remittances for Mexican Transnational Communities.” Economic Geography 74 (1):26–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordero Avendaño de Durand, Carmen 1997 La vara de mando: Costumbre jurídica en la transmisión de poderes. Oaxaca: Honorable Ayuntamiento de Oaxaca de Juárez, Biblioteca del 465 Aniversario.Google Scholar
Díaz-Polanco, Hector, and Burguete, Araceli 1996 “Sociedad colonial y rebellion indígena en el Obispado de Oaxaca (1660).” In El fuego de la inobediencia: Autonomía y rebellion India en el obispado de Oaxaca, edited by Díaz-Polanco, H., 17–52. Oaxaca, México: Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
Dinerman, Ina 1978 “Patterns of Adaptation Among Households of US-Bound Migrants from Michoacan, Mexico.” International Migration Review 12:485–501.Google Scholar
Durand, Jorge, Massey, Douglas S., and Zentano, René M. 2001 “Mexican Immigration to the United States: Continuities and Changes.” Latin American Research Review 36 (1): 107–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, Jorge, Parrado, Emilio A., and Massey, Douglas S. 1996 “Migradollars and Development: A Reconsideration of the Mexican Case.” International Migration Review 30 (2):423–44.Google ScholarPubMed
Gómez-Pompa, Arturo, and Kaus, Andrea 1990 “Traditional Management of Tropical Forests in Mexico.” In Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use of the Amazon Rain Forest, edited by Anderson, A. B., 45–64. New York and Oxford: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gyves, Leopoldo de 2000 “Juchitán: A Free and Autonomous Municipality.” In Indigenous Autonomy in Mexico, edited by Cal y Mayor, A. Burguete, 117–33. Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.Google Scholar
Hirabayashi, Lane Ryo 1983 “On the Formation of Migrant Village Associations in Mexico: Mixtec and Mountain Zapotec Cases.” Urban Anthropology 12 (1):29–44.Google Scholar
Hirabayashi, Lane Ryo 1993 Cultural Capital: Mountain Zapotec Migrant Associations in Mexico City. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Hulshof, Marije 1991 Zapotec Moves: Networks and Remittances of US-Bound Migrants from Oaxaca, Mexico. Amsterdam: Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI) 1997a La explotación forestal en el estado de Oaxaca. Aguascalientes: INEGI.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI) 1997b Oaxaca: Perfíl Sociodemográfico. Aguascalientes: Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas, Geografía e Informática.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI) 2000 Anuario Estadístico: Oaxaca, Edición 2000, Tomos I & II. Oaxaca, Mexico: INEGI, Gobierno del Estado de Oaxaca.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI) 2001 Estados Unidos Mexicanos: Principales resultados por Localidad XII Censo General de Población y Vivienda 2000 (CDROM). Aguascalientes: INEGI.Google Scholar
Inter-American Development Bank 2003 Sending Money Home: An International Comparison of Remittance Markets. Washington, DC: Multilateral Investment Fund, Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Kearney, Michael. 1972 Winds of Ixtepeji: World View and Society in a Zapotec Town. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
Kearney, Michael. 1986 “From the Invisible Hand to Visible Feet: Anthropological Studies of Migration and Development.” Annual Review of Anthropology 15:331–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klaver, Jeanine 1997 From the Land of the Sun to the City of Angels: The Migration Process of Zapotec Indians from Oaxaca, Mexico to Los Angeles, California. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Klooster, Daniel 2003 “Campesinos and Mexican Forest Policy During the Twentieth Century.” Latin American Research Review 38 (2): 94–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstrom, David P. 1996 “Economic Opportunity in Mexico and Return Migration from the United States.” Demography 33 (3): 357–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massey, Douglas S., Arango, Joaquín, Hugo, Graeme, Kouaouci, Ali, Pellegrino, Adela, and Taylor, J. Edward 1993 “Theories of International Migration: A Review and Appraisal.” Population and Development Review 19 (3): 431–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas S., Arango, Joaquín, Hugo, Graeme, Kouaouci, Ali, Pellegrino, Adela, and Taylor, J. Edward 1994 “An Evaluation of International Migration Theory: The North American Case.” Population and Development Review 20 (4): 699–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas S., and Espinosa, Kristin E. 1997 “What's Driving Mexico-U.S. Migration? A Theoretical, Empirical, and Policy Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (4): 939–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas S., and Parrado, Emilio A. 1994 “Migradollars: The Remittances and Savings of Mexican Migrants to the United States.” Population Research and Policy Review 13:3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas S., and Parrado, Emilio A. 1998 “International Migration and Business Formation in Mexico.” Social Science Quarterly 79 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
McCay, Bonnie J., and Acheson, James M. 1987 “Human Ecology of the Commons.” In The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources, edited by McCay, B. J., and Acheson, J. M., 37–65. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
McKean, Margaret A. 1982 “The Japanese Experience with Scarcity: Management of Traditional Common Lands.” Environmental Review 6 (2): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino Pérez, Leticia, and Alatorre, Gerardo 1997 “Las condiciones de los aprovechamientos forestales en los casos de distintas comunidades en México.” In El manejo forestal comunitario en México y sus perspectivas de sustentabilidad, edited by Merino, L., 35–132. Cuernavaca: Universidad Autónoma de México, Secretaria de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca (SEMARNAP), Consejo Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible.Google Scholar
Merino Perez, Leticia, Fernández, Patricia Gerez, and Zubirán, Sergio Madrid 2000 “Políticas, instituciones comunitarias y uso de los recursos comunes en México. In Sociedad, derecho y medio ambiente, edited by Bañuelos, M., 57–144. Mexico, D.F.: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, SEMARNAP, PROFEPA, CONACYT, SEP.Google Scholar
Mines, Richard, and DeJanvry, Alain 1982 “Migration to the United States and Mexican Rural Development: A Case Study.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64 (3): 444–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mountz, Alison, and Wright, Richard 1996 “Daily Life in the Transnational Migration Community of San Agustín, Oaxaca and Poughkeepsie, New York.” Diaspora 5 (3): 403–28.Google Scholar
Mutersbaugh, Tad 2002 “Migration, Common Property, and Communal Labor: Cultural Politics and Agency in a Mexican Village.” Political Geography 21 (4): 473–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, Laura 1990 Harmony Ideology: Justice and Control in a Zapotec Mountain Village. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagengast, Carole, and Kearney, Michael 1990 “Mixtee Ethnicity: Social Identity, Political Consciousness and Political Activism.” Latin American Research Review 25 (2): 61–91.Google Scholar
National Research Council 2002 The Drama of the Commons. Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Ostrom, Elinor, Dolsak, Nives, Stern, Paul C., Stovich, Susan, Weber, E. U., eds. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Netting, Robert McC. 1976 “What Alpine Peasants Have in Common: Observations on Communal Tenure in a Swiss Village.” Human Ecology 4 (2): 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orellana, Carlos 1973 “Mixtee Migrants in Mexico City: A Case Study of Urbanization.” Human Organization 32 (3): 273–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor 1990 Governing the Commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor, Burger, Joanna, Field, Chrsitopher B., Norgaard, Richar B., and Policansky, David 1999 “Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons, Global Challenges.” Science 284 (5412): 278–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pew Hispanic Center 2003 “Remittance Senders and Receivers: Tracking the Transnational Channels.” Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.Google Scholar
Pisa, Rosaria Angela 1994 “Popular Response to the Reform of Article 27: State Intervention and Community Resistance in Oaxaca.” Urban Anthropology 23 (2–3): 267–306.Google Scholar
Reichert, Joshua S. 1981 “The Migrant Syndrome: Seasonal U.S. Wage Labor and Rural Development in Central Mexico.” Human Organization 40:56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivera Salgado, Gaspar 1999 “Migration and Political Activism: Mexican Transnational Indigenous Communities in a Comparative Perspective.” PhD diss., University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Rozelle, Scott, Taylor, J. Edward, and de Brauw, Alan 1999 “Migration, Remittances, and Agricultural Productivity in China.” American Economic Review 89 (2): 287–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenstein, Hymie 1992 “Migration, Development and Remittances in Rural Mexico.” International Migration 30 (2): 127–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stark, Oded 1991 The Migration of Labor. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stuart, James, and Kearney, Michael 1981 “Causes and Effects of Agricultural Labor Migration from the Mixteca of Oaxaca to California. Working Papers in U.S.-Mexican Studies No. 28. Program in United States-Mexican Studies: University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. Edward 1987 “Undocumented Mexico-U.S. Migration and the Returns to Households in Rural Mexico.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 69:616–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. Edward 1999 “The New Economics of Labour Migration and the Role of Remittances in the Migration Process.” International Migration 37 (1): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, J. Edward, Arango, Joaquín, Hugo, Graeme, Kouaouci, Ali, Massey, Douglas S., and Pellegrino, Adela 1996a “International Migration and Community Development.” Population Index 62 (3): 397–418.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. Edward, Arango, Joaquín, Hugo, Graeme, Kouaouci, Ali, Massey, Douglas S., and Pellegrino, Adela 1996b “International Migration and National Development.” Population Index 62:181–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weist, Raymond E. 1984 “External Dependency and the Perpetuation of Temporary Migration to the United States.” In Patterns of Undocumented Migration: Mexico and the United States, edited by Jones, R. E., 110–135. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allenheld.Google Scholar
Wilson, Paul N., and Thompson, Gary D. 1993 “Common Property and Uncertainty: Compensating Coalitions by Mexico's Pastoral Ejidatarios.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 41 (2): 299–318.Google Scholar