Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T01:17:12.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Organized Labor Strikes and Social Spending in Latin America: The Synchronizing Effect of Mass Protest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

Dongkyu Kim*
Affiliation:
Dongkyu Kim is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.
Mi-son Kim*
Affiliation:
Mi-son Kim is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley.
Cesar Villegas*
Affiliation:
Cesar Villegas is a graduate student in political science at the University of Rio Grande Valley.

Abstract

The theories and evidence about relationships between democracy and social spending in Latin America are highly contested. A recent study shows that collective protest by organized labor effectively increases social security and welfare spending, whereas mass protest does not have comparable effects on human capital spending in Latin American democracies. This article reexamines the analysis and demonstrates that organized labor alone cannot sway democratic governments. Labor strikes require the synchronizing effect of mass protest to obtain government concessions. Only through concurrent episodes of mass protest can organized labor overcome the numerical disadvantage of pressing democratic government for social welfare spending. In understanding the relationship between labor protests and social welfare spending through the lens of insider-outsider dichotomy, it is critical to consider the synchronizing effect of mass protests. The findings remain robust with alternative measures of democracy and various model specifications.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
© University of Miami 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: Dongkyu Kim, Mi-son Kim, and Cesar Villegas declare none.

References

Almeida, Paul D. 2007. Defensive Mobilization: Popular Movements Against Economic Adjustment Policies in Latin America. Latin American Perspectives 34, 3: 123–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avelino, George, David, S. Brown, and Hunter, Wendy. 2005. The Effects of Capital Mobility, Trade Openness, and Democracy on Social Spending in Latin America, 1980–1999. American Journal of Political Science 49, 3: 625–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, Arthur S., and Kenneth, A. Wilson. 2019. Cross-National Time-Series Data Archive. Jerusalem: Databanks International. https://www.cntsdata.comGoogle Scholar
Brambor, Thomas, Clark, William Roberts, and Golder, Matt. 2006. Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14, 1: 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, David S., and Hunter, Wendy. 1999. Democracy and Social Spending in Latin America, 1980—92. American Political Science Review 93, 4: 779–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Mesquita, Bueno, Bruce, Alastair Smith, Randolph, M. Siverson, and James, D. Morrow. 2003. The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheibub, José Antonio, Gandhi, Jennifer, and Vreeland, James Raymond. 2010. Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited. Public Choice 143, 1—2: 67101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Boef, Suzanna, and Keele, Luke. 2008. Taking Time Seriously. American Journal of Political Science 52, 1: 184200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eterovic, Dalibor S., and Cassandra, M. Sweet. 2014. Democracy and Education in Twentieth-century Latin America. Economics and Politics 26, 2: 237–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Robert, R. Kaufman. 2008. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and John, D. Stephens. 2012. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, John, D. Stephens, Mustillo, Thomas, and Pribble, Jennifer. 2008. Social Policy in Latin America and the Caribbean, 1960–2006. Dataset. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina. http://huberandstephens.web.unc.edu/common-works/data/Google Scholar
International Labor Organization (ILO). Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean. 2014. Transition to Formality in Latin America and the Caribbean. http://ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/americas/ro-lima/documents/publication/wcms_314469.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R., and Segura-Ubiergo, Alex. 2001. Globalization, Domestic Politics, and Social Spending in Latin America: A Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis, 1973—97. World Politics 53, 4: 553–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Daniel, M. Brinks, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2007. Classifying Political Regimes in Latin America, 1945–2004. In Regimes and Democracy in Latin America: Theories and Methods, ed. Munck, Gerardo L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 123–60.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Scott, F. Richard. 1981. A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy 89, 5: 914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueda, David. 2005. Insider-Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties. American Political Science Review 99, 1: 6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solt, Frederick, Kim, Dongkyu, Lee, Kyu Young, Willardson, Spencer, and Kim, Seokdong. 2014. Neoliberal Reform and Protest in Latin American Democracies: A Replication and Correction. Research and Politics 1, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2019. Employment in Agriculture (percent of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)—Latin America and Caribbean. ILOSTAT database. Data retrieved September 2019. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.AGR.EMPL.ZS?locations=ZJGoogle Scholar
Zárate-Tenorio, Barbara. 2014. Social Spending Responses to Organized Labor and Mass Protests in Latin America, 1970–2007. Comparative Political Studies 47, 14: 1945–72.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kim et al. supplementary material

Kim et al. supplementary material

Download Kim et al. supplementary material(File)
File 144.3 KB