Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-564cf476b6-4htn5 Total loading time: 0.227 Render date: 2021-06-21T18:01:43.462Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018


Scholars believe that mass partisanship in Brazil is comparatively weak. Using evidence from a 2002 national survey, however, this study finds that the aggregate level of party identification actually falls only slightly below the world average and exceeds levels found in many newer democracies. Yet this finding is misleading, because the distribution of partisanship is skewed toward only one party, the PT. This trend results from a combination of party organization and recruitment efforts and individual motivation to acquire knowledge and become involved in politicized social networks. Partisanship for other parties, however, derives substantially from personalistic attachments to party leaders. This finding has implications for current debates about the status of parties in Brazil. Also important is the impact of the 2005 corruption scandal implicating the PT and President Lula da Silva's administration.

Research Article
Copyright © University of Miami 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.


Almeida, Alberto C. 2004. A explicaçào do voto nas eleiçòes presidenciais de 2002. Unpublished mss. Rio de Janeiro: Fundaçào Getúlio Vargas.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney, Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture. Boston: Little, Brown.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2002. The Puzzle of Party Discipline in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society 44, 1 (Spring): 144.Google Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio, and Mathew, McCubbins. 2003. Agenda Power in Brazil's Cåmara dos Deputados, 1989–98. World Politics 55, 4: 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaulo ed. 2003. Radicals in Power: The Workers' Party and Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Baker, Andy. 2002. Free-Market Reform and Presidential Approval: the Politicization of Economic Policy Debates in Brazil. Dados 45, 1: 176.Google Scholar
Baker, Andy, and Lucio, Rennó 2005. Social Context and Voter Volatility in Weak-Party Systems: Networks and Neighborhoods in Brazil's 2002 Elections. Unpublished mss. Northeastern University.Google Scholar
Balbachevsky, Elizabeth. 1992. Identidade partidária e instituiçòes políticas no Brasil. Lua Nova 26: 133–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, Ted, and Joshua, Tucker. 2001. Pathways to Partisanship in New Democracies: Evidence from Russia. Unpublished mss. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Philip, Converse, Warren, Miller, and Donald, Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward, and James, Stimson. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carreirào, Yan 2002. A decisào do voto nas eleiçòes presidencias brasileiras. Rio de Janeiro: Editora da UFSC/Editora FGV.Google Scholar
Carreirào, Yan Souza, and Maria, D'Alva 2002. Os partidos políticos e a decisào de voto no Brasil. Paper presented at the meeting of the Brazilian Political Science Association, Niterói.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudos de Opiniào Pública (CESOP).. 2003. Estudo eleitoral brasileiro. Spss database. Campinas: Cesop. http:www.unicamp.brcesop.Google Scholar
Clarke, Harold, and Marianne, Stewart. 1998. The Decline of Parties in the Minds of Citizens. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 357–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES).. 2003. The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. Google Scholar
Converse, Phillip. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David, Apter.. New York: Free Press. 161.Google Scholar
Converse, Phillip. 1969. Of Time and Partisan Stability. Comparative Political Studies 2: 139–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criterium Pesquisas de Opiniào e Avaliacào de Políticas Públicas.. 2003. Expectativa governo Lula. Poll. Sào Paulo: Criterium.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Martin, Wattenberg eds. 2000. Parties Without Partisans: Political Changes in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Datafolha, 2003. Avaliaçào Lula—1 Ano. December 21, 2003. Sào Paulo: Datafolha Instituto de Pesquisas. Accessed April 12, 2005Google Scholar
Datafolha, 2004. Avaliaçào Presidente Luiz inácio Lula da Silva—14 a 17 dezembro 2004. Accessed April 12, 2005Google Scholar
Datafolha, 2005. Avaliaçào Presidente Luiz inácio Lula da Silva—10 de agosto 2005. Accessed October 24, 2005Google Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina, and Fernando, Limongi. 2000. Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil. Comparative Politics 32, 2 (January): 170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genoino, José. 2003. A campanha de filiaçào do Pt. ?cod=571 Accessed April 11, 2005.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Bradley, Palmquist, and Eric, Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2004. Civil Society in Lula's Brazil. Unpublished mss. Centre for Brazilian Studies, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Honaker, James, Anne, Joseph, Gary, King, Kenneth, Scheve, and Naunihal, Singh. 2001. Amelia: A Program for Missing Data. Microsoft Windows version. Cambridge: Harvard University. Available at Google Scholar
Jennings, , Kent, M., and Richard, Niemi. 1974. The Political Character of Adolescence: The Influence of Families and Schools. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, , Kent, M., and Richard, Niemi. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret. 1992. The Workers' Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kinzo, Maria 2005. Os partidos no eleitorado: percepçòes públicas e laços partidários no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais 20, 57: 181.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Stein, Rokkan. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy, Scully eds. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Rachel, Meneguello, and Timothy, Power. 2000. Conservative Parties, Democray, and Economic Reform in Contemporary Brazil. In Conservative Parties, the Right, and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Kevin, J. Middlebrook.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1222.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., and Thomas, F. Klobucar. 2000. The Development of Party Identification in Post-Soviet Societies. American Journal of Political Science 44, 4: 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Martin, Wattenberg., and Oksana, Malanchuk. 1986. Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates. American Political Science Review 80, 2: 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Willian, Reisinger., and Vicki, Hesli. 1998. Leader Popularity and Party Development in Post-Soviet Russia. In Elections and Voters in Post-Communist Russia, ed. Matthew, Wyman.. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 1135.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren, and Shanks, J. Merrill 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moisés, José Álvaro. 1992. Os brasileiros e a democracia. Sào Paulo: Paz e Terra.Google Scholar
Opiniào Pública (Campinas). 2003. Encarte Tendencias. Opiniào Pública 9, 2: 167.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy. 2000. Political Institutions in Democratic Brazil: Politics as a Permanent Consitutional Convention. In Democratic Brazil, ed. Power, and Peter, Kingstone.. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. 135.Google Scholar
Primeira Leitura On-Line.. 2004. Pt-empresa se prepara para eleiçòes municipais. No. 1061 (January 30). Accessed April 11, 2005Google Scholar
Reis, Fábio W. ed. 1978. Os partidos e o regime. Sào Paulo: Símbolo.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2004. From Socialism to Social Democracy?Party Organization and the Transformation of the Workers' Party in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies 37, 9: 11024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, W. Phillips. 1979. The Development of Party Identification among Adults: Exploration of a Functional Model. American Political Science Review 73, 4: 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, André. 1990. Collor na periferia: a volta por cima do populismo?In De Geisel a Collor: o balanço da transiçào, Sào Paulo: Sumaré/IDESP. 152.Google Scholar
Singer, André. 1999. Esquerda e direita no eleitorado brasileiro. Sào Paulo: EdUSP/FAPESP.Google Scholar
Soares, Gláucio 1961. As bases ideológicas do lacerdismo. Revista Civilizaçào Brasileira 1, 4: 170.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Jason, Wittenberg, and Gary, King. 2003. Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. January 5. Available at Google Scholar
Tribunal Superior Eleitoral (TSE).. 2002. Resultados das eleiçòes de 2002. Microsoft Access computer files. Brasília: Tse.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Program (UNDP).. 2003. Atlas do desenvolvimento humano no Brasil. Cd-Rom. Version 1.0.0. Brasília: Undp for Brazil.Google Scholar
von Mettenheim, Kurt. 1995. The Brazilian Voter: Mass Politics in Democratic Transition (1974–1986). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Sources of Mass Partisanship in Brazil
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *