Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-l48q4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-27T04:55:35.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Leader Without Followers? The Growing Divergence Between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Andrés Malamud*
Institute of Social Sciences of the University of Lisbon.


Brazilian diplomats and academics alike have long regarded regional leadership as a springboard to global recognition. Yet Brazil's foreign policy has not translated the country's structural and instrumental resources into effective regional leadership. Brazil's potential followers have not aligned with its main goals, such as a permanent seat on the UN Security Council and Directorship-General of the World Trade Organization; some have even challenged its regional influence. Nevertheless, Brazil has been recognized as an emergent global power. This article analyzes the growing mismatch between the regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy and shows how both theoretical expectations and policy planning were “luckily foiled” by unforeseen developments. It argues that because of regional power rivalries and a relative paucity of resources, Brazil is likely to consolidate itself as a middle global power before gaining acceptance as a leader in its region.

Research Article
Copyright © University of Miami 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abreu, Sergio. 2006. Protocolo de adhesión de Venezuela al MERCOSUR. Exposición en oportunidad de su aprobación en el Senado. Uruguay , Cámara de Senadores, October 31. Scholar
Almeida, Paulo Roberto. 2005. Políticas de integração regional no governo Lula. Política Internacional [Lisbon] 29: 3360.Google Scholar
Almeida, Paulo Roberto. 2007. Brazil as a Regional Player and an Emerging Global Power. FES Briefing Paper 8. July. São Paulo : Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Angel E. 2007. Venezuela 2007: los motores del socialismo se alimentan con petróleo. Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago) 27: 265–89. Special Issue.Google Scholar
Amorim, Celso. 2003. Discurso proferido pelo Embaixador Celso Amorim por ocasião da transmissão do Cargo de Ministro de Estado das Relações Exteriores. Brasília, January 1. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Amorim, Celso. 2008. Brasil pode suspender crédito a vizinhos. Estado de São Paulo, December 3.Google Scholar
Armijo, Leslie Elliott. 2007. The Brics Countries (Brazil, Russia, India, and China) as Analytical Category: Mirage or Insight? Asian Perspective 31, 4: 742.Google Scholar
Arraes, Virgílio. 2006. O Brasil e a ONU de 1990 a nossos dias: das grandes conferências às grandes pretensões. In Relações internacionais do Brasil. Temas e agendas, vol. 2, ed. Altemani, Henrique and Lessa, António Carlos. São Paulo : Saraiva. 741.Google Scholar
Bouzas, Roberto, Veiga, Pedro Da Motta, and Torrent, Ramón. 2002. In-Depth Analysis of Mercosur Integration, Its Prospectives and the Effects Thereof on the Market Access of Eu Goods, Services and Investment. Report presented to the Commission of the European Communities, Observatory of Globalization, Barcelona. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Brasil. Ministério da Defesa. 2008. Estratégia Nacional de Defesa (End). Brasília. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Burges, Sean W. 2005. Bounded by the Reality of Trade: Practical Limits to a South American Region. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18, 3: 437–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burges, Sean W. 2006. Without Sticks or Carrots: Brazilian Leadership in South America during the Cardoso Era, 1992–2002. Bulletin of Latin American Research 25, 1: 2342.Google Scholar
Burges, Sean W. 2007. Building a Global Southern Coalition: the Competing Approaches of Brazil's Lula and Venezuela's Chávez. Third World Quarterly 28, 7: 1343–58.Google Scholar
Burges, Sean W. 2008. Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War. International Relations 22, 1: 6584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cason, Jeffrey, and Power, Timothy. 2009. Presidentialization, Pluralization, and the Rollback of Itamaraty: Explaining Change in Brazilian Foreign Policy Making in the Cardoso-Lula Era. International Political Science Review 30, 2: 117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centro Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais-Centro de Estudos de Integração e Desenvolvimento (CEBRI-CINDES). 2007. Força-tarefa “O Brasil na América do Sul.” Relatório final. Rio de Janeiro, June. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Unión para la Nueva Mayoría (CEUNM). 2008. Balance militar de América del Sur 2008. Buenos Aires : CEUNM. Scholar
The Economist . 2008a. An Economic Superpower, and Now Oil Too. April 17.Google Scholar
The Economist . 2008b. Brazil's Foreign Policy: the Samba Beat, with Missteps. December 18.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai. 1975. A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations: On Power, Involvement, and Their Correlates. New York : Free Press.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2007. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: towards an Eu-Brazil Strategic Partnership (Com 281). Brussels, May 30. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Flemes, Daniel. 2007. Emerging Middle Powers' Soft Balancing Strategy: State and Perspectives of the IBSA Dialogue Forum. GIGA Working Paper 57. Hamburg : German Institute of Global and Area Studies. Scholar
Garcia, Marco Aurélio. 2008. Gobierno ecuatoriano cometió un error muy grave. El Comercio (Quito), November 22.Google Scholar
Gauthier, Amélie, and de Sousa, Sarah John. 2006. Brazil in Haiti: Debate over the Peacekeeping Mission. Fride Comment, November. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
O Globo (Rio de Janeiro). 2010. Serra se diz cético quanto ao Mercosul. September 10. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Gratius, Susanne. 2007. Brazil in the Americas: a Regional Peace Broker? FRIDE Working Paper 35, April. Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Hakim, Peter. 2002. Two Ways to Go Global. Foreign Affairs 81, 1: 148–62.Google Scholar
Higgott, Richard. 2007. Alternative Models of Regional Cooperation? The Limits of Regional Institutionalization in East Asia. In European Union and New Regionalism: Regional Actors and Global Governance in a Post-Hegemonic Era, ed. Telò, Mario. Aldershot : Ashgate. 75106.Google Scholar
Hirst, Monica. 2007. South American Intervention in Haiti. Fride Comment, April.Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew, Cooper, Andrew F., González González, Guadalupe, Sennes, Ricardo Ubiraci, and Sitaraman, Srini. 2000. Paths to Power: Foreign Policy Strategies of Intermediate States. Working Paper no. 244. Washington , DC : Woodrow Wilson International Center Latin American Program.Google Scholar
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). 2006. The Military Balance 2006. Oxford : Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inter Press Service. 2005. Paraguay: U.S. Military Presence Stirs Speculation. August 4. Accessed March 10, 2009.Google Scholar
Jaguaribe, Helio. 2001. La opción de hierro. Consolidar y expandir el Mercado Común del Sur. Encrucijadas 1, 4: 2639.Google Scholar
Jordaan, Eduard. 2003. The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 30, 2: 165–81.Google Scholar
Kennan, George F. 1993. Around the Cragged Hill: A Personal and Political Philosophy. New York : Norton.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1969. Lilliputian Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics. International Organization 23, 2: 291310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafer, Celso. 2001. A identidade internacional do Brasil e a política externa brasileira. São Paulo : Perspectiva.Google Scholar
Lima, Maria Regina Soares de. 2008. Brazil Rising. Multipolar World, Internationale Politik (Fall): 6267.Google Scholar
Lima, Maria Regina Soares de, and Hirst, Monica. 2006. Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice, and Responsibilities. International Affairs 82, 1: 2140.Google Scholar
Malamud, Andrés. 2005. Mercosur Turns 15: between Rising Rhetoric and Declining Achievement. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18, 3: 421–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malamud, Andrés, and Castro, Pablo. 2007. Are Regional Blocs Leading from Nation States to Global Governance? a Skeptical View from Latin America. Iberoamericana: Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies 37, 1: 115–34.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter. 1999. The Logic of Regional Integration: Europe and Beyond. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newsweek . 2008. Weathering the Storm. July 26. Scholar
Nolte, Detlef. 2007. How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops. Helsinki, May 7–12.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph. 1990. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York : Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pinheiro, Letícia. 2000. Traídos pelo desejo: um ensaio sobre a teoria e a prática da política externa brasileira contemporânea. Contexto Internacional 22, 2: 305–35.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1990. The State: Its Nature, Development and Prospects. Cambridge : Polity Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Roberto, and Tokatlian, Juan Gabriel. 2003. El lugar de Brasil en la política exterior argentina. Buenos Aires : Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Saraiva, Miriam Gomes. 2007. As estratégias de cooperação sul-sul nos marcos da política externa brasileira de 1993 a 2007. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 50: 4259.Google Scholar
Saraiva, Miriam Gomes. 2009. O Brasil entre a União Européia e a América do Sul: limites para uma relação triangular. Paper presented at the 28th Conference of the Latin American Studies Association, Rio de Janeiro, June 11–14.Google Scholar
Schirm, Stefan A. 2007. Emerging Power Leadership in Global Governance: Assessing the Leader-Follower Nexus for Brazil and Germany. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops. Helsinki, May 7–12.Google Scholar
Sotero, Paulo, and Armijo, Leslie Elliott. 2007. Brazil: to Be or Not to Be a Bric? Asian Perspective 31, 4: 4370.Google Scholar
Souza, Amaury de. 2008. O Brasil na região e no mundo: percepções da comunidade brasileira de política externa. Rio de Janeiro : CEBRI.Google Scholar
United Nations. 2005. In Larger Freedom: towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All. Report of the Secretary-General. March 21. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Vaillant, Marcel. 2007. ¿Por qué Uruguay necesita negociar con Estados Unidos? Obreal/Eularo Specialist Paper. October. European Union-Latin America Observatory. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Vaz, Alcides Costa. 2007. Brasil y sus vecinos: ¿del descubrimiento a la interdependencia? In La percepción de Brasil en el contexto internacional: perspectivas y desafíos. Tomo I: América Latina, ed. Hofmeister, Wilhelm, Rojas, Francisco, and Solís, Luis Guillermo. Rio de Janeiro : Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. 2340.Google Scholar
Vigevani, Tullo, Favaron, Gustavo, Ramanzini, Haroldo, and Correia, Rodrigo A.. 2008. O papel da integração regional para o Brasil: universalismo, soberania e percepção das elites. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 51, 1: 527.Google Scholar
Vizentini, Paulo Fagundes. 2006. O G-3 e o G-20: o Brasil e as novas coalizões internacionais. In Relações internacionais do Brasil. Temas e agendas, Volume 2, ed. Altemani, Henrique and Lessa, António Carlos. São Paulo : Editora Saraiva. 159–93.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal . 2008. Brazil Joins Front Rank of New Economic Powers. May 13.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal . 2009. Economy Fuels Brazil's Ambitions beyond South America. February 6.Google Scholar
Wilson, Dominic, and Purushothaman, Roopa. 2003. Dreaming With BRICs: The Path to 2050. Global Economics Paper no. 99. October 1. New York : Goldman Sachs. Accessed July 7, 2011.Google Scholar