Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:19:49.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Invention of Taxation in the Inka Empire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 December 2018

Gary Urton  and
Alejandro Chu
Gary Urton*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
Alejandro Chu
Affiliation:
Escuela profesional de Arqueología, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, Peru (achub@unmsm.edu.pe).
*
(gurton@fas.harvard.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several khipus—Inka knotted-string recording devices—were recently excavated at a storage facility at the Peruvian south coast site of Inkawasi, found buried under agricultural produce (i.e., chili peppers, peanuts, and black beans). These khipus contain a formulaic arrangement of numerical values not encountered on khipus from elsewhere in Tawantinsuyu (the Inka Empire). The formula includes first, a large number, hypothesized to record the sum total of produce included in a deposit, followed by a “fixed number,” and then one or more additional numbers. The fixed number plus the additional number(s) sum to the original large number. It is hypothesized that the fixed number represents an amount deducted from the deposit to support storage facility personnel. As such, it represented a tax assessed on deposits, the first evidence we have for a system of taxation on goods in the Inka Empire. It is proposed that the size and complexity of the storage facility at Inkawasi prompted the “invention” of a kind of financing instrument—taxation—not known previously from Inka administration. We also consider, but provisionally set aside, the alternative hypothesis that the fixed values recorded on the Inkawasi khipus could have represented amounts of seeds set aside from deposits for the next year's planting.

Durante las excavaciones de un complejo de almacenamiento (Qolqawasi) del sitio de Inkawasi, en la costa sur del Perú, se hallaron varios khipus —instrumentos de registro Inkas empleando cordeles anudados— asociados a diferentes cultivos agrícolas (e.g., ají, maní y frijoles negros). Estos khipus presentan una disposición de valores numéricos que no se ha encontrado en otras partes del Tawantinsuyo (el Imperio Inka). Esta secuencia incluye un valor alto, el cual correspondería a la cantidad total de un determinado producto depositado en un almacén (qolqa), seguido de un “valor fijo” y uno o más números adicionales. Si se suman el valor fijo y los números adicionales, se obtiene al valor alto. Proponemos que el valor fijo representa un monto que era deducido de los productos almacenados en las qolqas para el mantenimiento del personal encargado y el funcionamiento de los almacenes. Ante esta evidencia de un posible impuesto a los productos almacenados, estaríamos ante las primeras manifestaciones de un sistema tributario sobre bienes en el Imperio Inka. Proponemos que, ante el tamaño y complejidad de las instalaciones de almacenamiento, en Inkawasi existió la necesidad de “inventar” un tipo de instrumento financiero —el impuesto— desconocido previamente en estudios de la administración Inka. También podemos considerar como hipótesis alternativa que los valores fijos de los khipus de Inkawasi representen una cierta cantidad de semillas no depositadas en los almacenes que habrían sido empleadas para la siembra de la siguiente cosecha.

Keywords

InkaInkawasikhipuagriculturestoragetaxationlaborInkaInkawasikhipuagriculturaalmacenajeimpuestostrabajo
Type
Article
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by the Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ascher, Marcia, and Ascher, Robert 1997[1981] Mathematics of the Inca: Code of the Quipu. Dover, New York.Google Scholar
Bertonio, Ludovico 1984[1612] Vocabulario de la Lengua Aymara. Ediciones CERES, Cochabamba, Bolivia.Google Scholar
Buckmaster, Dale 1974 The Incan Quipu and the Jacobsen Hypothesis. Journal of Accounting Research 12(1):178–181.Google Scholar
Chu, Alejandro 2015 La plaza y el ushnu mayor de Incahuasi, Cañete. Cuadernos del Qhapaq Ñan 3(3):92–110.Google Scholar
Cieza de León, Pedro 1967[1553] El Señorio de los Incas. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima.Google Scholar
Clindaniel, Jonathan N., and Urton, Gary 2017 Quipus de Pachacamac: Hacia la Estandardización de las Convenciones de Signos en el Tawantinsuyu. In Pachacamac: El Oráculo en el horizonte marino del sol poniente, edited by Pozzi-Escot, Denise, pp. 274–289. Banco de Credito del Perú, Lima.Google Scholar
Cobo, Bernabé 1983 [1653] History of the Inca Empire Translated by Roland Hamilton. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
D'Altroy, Terence N. 2015a The Incas. 2nd ed. Wiley Blackwell, West Sussex.Google Scholar
D'Altroy, Terence N. 2015b Funding the Inka Empire. In The Inka Empire: A Multidisciplinary Approach, edited by Shimada, Izumi, pp. 97–120. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
D'Altroy, Terence N., and Earle, Timothy K. 1992 [1985] Staple Finance, Wealth Finance and Storage in the Inka Political Economy. In Inca Storage Systems, edited by LeVine, Terry Y., pp. 31–61. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
D'Altroy, Terence N., and Hastorf, Christine A. (editors) 2001 Empire and Domestic Economy. Plenum Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
Ezzamel, Mahmoud 2002 Accounting and Redistribution: The Palace and Mortuary Cult in the Middle Kingdom, Ancient Egypt. The Accounting Historians Journal 29(1):61–103.Google Scholar
Forrester, D.A.R. 1968 The Incan Contribution to Double-Entry Accounting. Journal of Accounting Research 6(2):283.Google Scholar
Garcilaso de la Vega, El Inca 1966 [1609] Royal Commentaries of the Incas Translated and with an Introduction by Livermore, Harold V.. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
González Holguín, Diego de 1952 [1608] Vocabulario de la lengua general de todo el Perú llamada lengua Qquichua o del Inca. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.Google Scholar
Hastorf, Christine A. 2017 The Social Archaeology of Food: Thinking about Eating from Prehistory to the Present. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hyslop, John 1985 Inkawasi, the New Cuzco: Cañete, Lunahuaná, Peru. BAR International Series Vol. 234. British Archaeological Record, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Lyle E. 1964 The Ancient Inca Empire of Peru and the Double Entry Accounting Concept. Journal of Accounting Research 2(2):221–28.Google Scholar
Julien, Catherine J. 1988 How Inca Decimal Administration Worked. Ethnohistory 35(3):257–79.Google Scholar
LeVine, Terry Y. (editor) 1992 Inka Storage Systems. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Locke, L. Leland 1923 The Ancient Quipu, or Peruvian Knot Record. American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
Marcone Flores, Giancarlo, and Espinola, Rodrigo Areche 2015 El valle de Cañete durante los períodos prehispánicos tardíos: perspectivas desde el Huarco – Cerro Azul. Cuardernos del Phapaq Ñan 3(3):48–68.Google Scholar
Marcus, Joyce 2017 The Inca Conquest of Cerro Azul. Ñawpa Pacha: Journal of Andean Archaeology 37(2):175–196Google Scholar
Medrano, Manuel, and Urton, Gary 2018 Toward the Decipherment of a Set of Mid-Colonial Khipus from the Santa Valley, Coastal Peru. Ethnohistory 65(1):1–23.Google Scholar
Morris, Craig 1992 The Technology of Highland Inka Food Storage. In Inka Storage Systems, edited by LeVine, Terry Y., pp. 237–258. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Murra, John V. 1982 The Mit'a Obligations of Ethnic Groups to the Inka State. In The Inca and Aztec States, 1400–1800: Anthropology and History, edited by Collier, George A., Rosaldo, Renato I., and Wirth, John D., pp. 237–262. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ta-K'un, Wu 1952 An Interpretation of Chinese Economic History. Past & Present 1:1–12.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary 2001 A Calendrical and Demographic Tomb Text from Northern Peru. Latin American Antiquity 12:127–147.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary 2003 Signs of the Inka Khipu: Binary Coding in the Andean Knotted-String Records. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary 2005 Khipu Archives: Duplicate Accounts and Identity Labels in the Inka Knotted-String Records. Latin American Antiquity 16:147–167.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary 2006 Censos registrados en cordeles con “Amarres”: Padrones Poblacionales Pre-Hispánicos y Coloniales Tempranos en los Khipu Inka. Revista Andina 42:153–196.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary 2009 Sin, Confession and the Arts of Book- and Cord-Keeping: An Intercontinental and Transcultural Exploration of Accounting and Governmentality. Comparative Studies in Society and History 51(4):1–31.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary 2017 Inka History in Knots: Reading Khipus as Primary Sources. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Urton, Gary, and Chu, Alejandro 2015 Accounting in the King's Storehouse: The Inkawasi Khipu Archive. Latin American Antiquity 26:512–529.Google Scholar
Van De Mieroop, Marc 2007 A History of the Ancient Near East: ca. 3000–323 B.C. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Wachtel, Nathan 1982 The Mitimas of the Cochabamba Valley: The Colonization Policy of Huayna Capac. In The Inca and Aztec states, 1400–1800, edited by Collier, George A., Rosaldo, Renato I., and Wirth, John D., pp. 199–235. Academic Press, New York and London.Google Scholar
Webster, Noah 1978 Webster's New Twentieth Century Dictionary of the English Language. 2nd ed. William Collins and World Publishing.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Urton and Chu supplementary material

Urton and Chu supplementary material

Download Urton and Chu supplementary material(File)
File 56.7 KB