Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T15:07:55.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computational modeling for X-ray lasers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

G.J. Pert
G.J. Pert
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of York, Heslington, York YO1 5DD, United Kingdom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various problems involved in the simulation of current X-ray laser experiments are discussed. The methods are based on laser-plasma simulation techniques with simultaneous calculation of the ionization dynamics, and are particularly appropriate for collisional and recombination pumped systems.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 1994 , pp. 209 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ansari, S.M.R. et al. 1970 Z. Naturforsch. 25a, 1761.Google Scholar
Bates, D.R. et al. 1962 Proc. Roy. Soc. 267A, 297.Google Scholar
Borovskiy, A.V. et al. 1992 J. Phys. B. 25, 4991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, W. & John, R.W. 1992 In X-Ray Lasers 1992 Inst. of Phys. Conf. Series 125(Adam Hilger, Bristol), p. 287.Google Scholar
Burgess, A. 1964a In Proceedings of a Symposium on Atomic Collision Processes in Plasmas, UK Atomic Energy Authority Report 4818, (Culham, UK), p. 63.Google Scholar
Burgess, A. 1964b Astrophys. J. 139, 776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, A. & Summers, H.P. 1976 Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 174, 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, A. et al. 1977 Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc. 179, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnett, N.H. & Corkum, P.B. 1989 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B6, 1195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenais-Popovics, C. et al. 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett., 59, 2161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djaoui, A. & Rose, S.J. 1992 J. Phys. B. 25, 2745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulieu, A. 1992 In X-Ray Lasers 1992 Inst. of Phys. Conf. Series 125(Adam Hilger, Bristol), p. 243.Google Scholar
Eder, D.E. 1989 Phys. Fluids B. 1, 2462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eder, D.E. & Scott, H.A. 1991 J.Q.S.R.T. 45, 189.Google Scholar
Eder, D.E. et al. 1992 Phys. Rev. A 45, 6761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, R.C. 1990 X-Ray Lasers (Academic Press, Boston).Google Scholar
Feit, M.D. & Fleck, J.A. 1990 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B7, 2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gautier, J-C. et al. 1983 J. Phys. B. 16, 321.Google Scholar
Gear, G.W. 1971 Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).Google Scholar
Golden, L.B. & Sampson, D.H. 1977 J. Phys. B. 10, 2229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, I.P. et al. 1980 Comp. Phys. Comm. 21, 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griem, H.K. 1964 Plasma Spectroscopy (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
Hagelstein, P.L. 1981 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, Report U.C.R.L. 53100.Google Scholar
Hagelstein, P.L. 1987 J. Phys. B. 20, 5785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummer, D.G. 1981 J.Q.S.R.T. 26, 187.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V.V. 1973 Transfer of Radiation in Spectral Lines trans D.G. Hummer, N.B.S. Special Publication 385 (National Bureau of Standards, Washington).Google Scholar
Jacoby, D. et al. 1981 Opt. Comm. 37, 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeglé, P. et al. 1987 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B4, 563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, A. 1991 In X-Ray Lasers 1990 Inst. Phys. Conf. Series. 116(Adam Hilger, Bristol), p. 289.Google Scholar
Klisnick, A. et al. 1990 Appl. Phys. B. 50, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klisnick, A. et al. 1992 In X-Ray Lasers 1992 Inst. Phys. Conf. Series 125(Adam Hilger, Bristol), p. 305.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.T. 1987 J.Q.S.R.T. 38, 131.Google Scholar
Lee, T.N. et al. 1987 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbody, M.T.M. et al. 1992 In X-Ray Lasers 1992, Inst. Phys. Conf. Series. 125(Adam Hilger, Bristol), p. 247.Google Scholar
Lokke, W.A. & Grasberger, W.H. 1977 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report UCRL 52276.Google Scholar
Lotz, W. 1970 Z. Phys. 232, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, D.L. et al. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, H. 1947 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Report LA 647.Google Scholar
McWhirter, R.W.F. & Hearn, A.G. 1963 Proc. Phys. Soc. 82, 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moores, D.L. et al. 1980 J. Phys. B. 13, 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
More, R.M. 1982 J.Q.S.R.T. 27, 345.Google Scholar
More, R.M. et al. 1988 In A.I.P. Conference Series 168 33.Google Scholar
Nash, J.K. 1991 In Ultrashort-Wavelength Lasers, S.P.I.E. Proceedings, Vol. 1551, p. 79.Google Scholar
Neely, D. et al. 1992 In X-Ray Lasers 1992, Inst. Phys. Conf. Series 125(Adam Hilger, Bristol) p. 37.Google Scholar
Osterheld, A.L. et al. 1992 In X-Ray Lasers 1992. Inst. Phys. Conf. Series 125(Adam Hilger, Bristol) p. 308.Google Scholar
Oza, D.H. et al. 1986. Phys. Rev. A 34, 4519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penetrante, B.M. & Bardsley, J.N. 1991 Phys. Rev. A 43, 3100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrot, F. 1989 Physica Scripta 39, 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1976 J. Phys. B. 9, 3301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1978 J. Comp. Phys. 27, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1979 J. Phys. B. 12, 2067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1981 J. Comp. Phys. 39, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1983a J. Fluid Mech. 131, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1983b Plasma Phys. 25, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1987 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B4, 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1990 J. Phys. B. 23, 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1991a In Ultrashort-Wavelength Lasers: S.P.I.E. Proceedings, Vol. 1551, p. 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1991b J.Q.S.R.T. 46, 367.Google Scholar
Pert, G.J. 1992 In X-Ray Lasers 1992 Inst. Phys. Conf. Series 125(Adam Hilger, Bristol), p. 105.Google Scholar
Pert, G.J. & Ramsden, S.A. 1974 Opt. Comm. 11, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, D.E. et al. 1977 At. Data Nucl.·Data Tables 20, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratowsky, R.P. et al. 1992 In X-Ray Lasers 1992, Inst. Phys. Conf. Series.(Adam Hilger, Bristol).Google Scholar
Rickert, A. & Meyer-Ter-Vehn, J. 1990 Max-Planck-Inst. für Quantenoptik Report.Google Scholar
Rosen, M.D. et al. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shestakov, A.I. & Eder, D.C. 1989 J.Q.S.R.T. 42, 489.Google Scholar
Sobolev, V.V. 1957 Soviet Astro–A.J. 1, 678.Google Scholar
Suckewer, S. & Fishman, H. 1980, J. Appl. Phys. 51, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suckewer, S. et al. 1985 Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walling, R.S. & Weisheit, J.C. 1988. Phys. Rep. 162, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J.S. et al. 1992 Phys. Rev. A. 45, 4010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiese, W.L. 1966. Atomic Transition Probabilities, N.B.S. Data Series NSRDS-NBS 4 and 22 (National Bureau of Standards, Washington).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Regemorter, H. 1962 Astrophys. J.. 136, 906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wyngaarden, W.L. et al. 1979 Phys. Rev. A. 20, 1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H. et al. 1992 J. Phys. B. 25, 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zherikhin, A.N. et al. 1976 Sov. J. Quant. Electron. 6, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar