Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T15:49:09.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of target implosion on irradiation by proton beams I Beam interaction with target plasma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Moritake Tamba ,
Norimasa Nagata ,
Shigeo Kawata  and
Keishiro Niu
Moritake Tamba
Affiliation:
The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research, Wako-shi, Saitama 351, Japan
Norimasa Nagata
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 227, Japan
Shigeo Kawata
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 227, Japan
Keishiro Niu
Affiliation:
Department of Energy Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Nagatsuta, Midori-ku, Yokohama 227, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Numerical simulations and analyses are given for the implosion of a hollow shell target driven by proton beams. The target consists of three layers of Pb, Al and DT. The Pb and Al layers play roles of a tamper and a pusher, respectively. The main part of the beam energy is deposited in the Al layer. But the process of deposition depends strongly on the distribution of incident angles and particle energies. As the Al layer is heated by proton beams, the layer expands and pushes the DT layer toward the target centre. This type of implosion motion is examined by using a similarity solution for the slab model. To obtain an optimum velocity for the DT implosion, the optimum target size and optimum layer thicknesses are determined. The Rayleigh–Taylor instability, accompanied by the implosion motion is investigated, and the implosion is found to be stable with respect to the chosen target structure. The effects of inhomogeneities on implosion are shown to be severe. The initial fluctuation of the temperature or the density in the Al layer must be less than 3% and the maximum amplitude of the ripples on the initial boundary surface should be less than 3 μm with a view to achieving a high target gain.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , May 1983 , pp. 121 - 149
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abe, T. & Niu, K. 1981 Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 20, L91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boris, J. P. & Orens, J. H. 1978 Digest of Tech. Papers Presented at Topical Meeting on ICF, San Diego, Thcl-1.Google Scholar
Frank, R. M. & Lazarus, R. B. 1964 Methods in Computational Physics 3.Google Scholar
Hora, H. 1972 Laser Interaction and Related Plasma Phenomena, Schwarz, H. J. & Hora, H. editors (Plenum, New York) Vol 1, 365.Google Scholar
Livingston, M. S. & Bethe, H. A. 1937 Rev. Mod. Phys. 9, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiguch, A. & Yabe, T. 1981 Osaka Univ. Inst. Laser Eng. Rept. ILE8132p.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. H., Bangarter, R. O., Lindl, J. D., Mead, W. C. & Pan, Y. L. 1975 LLL preprint UCRL-79373.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y. & Kawakita, K. 1982 Proceedings of Japan–U.S. Seminar on Theory and Applicatiorz of Multiply-Ionized Plasma Produced by Laser and Particle Beams, Nara.Google Scholar
Whaling, W. 1958 Handbuch der Phys. Bd XXXIV, 13.Google Scholar
Winterberg, F. 1968 Plasma Phys. 10, 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yabe, T., Nishiguchi, A. & Ueda, N. 1981 Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, F. C., Mosher, D., Stephanakis, S. J., Goldstein, S. A. & Mehlhorn, T. A. 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar