Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-5zgkz Total loading time: 0.279 Render date: 2021-09-20T09:17:28.001Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Country ideology and the California Vowel Shift

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2015

Robert J. Podesva
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Annette D'Onofrio
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Janneke Van Hofwegen
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Seung Kyung Kim
Affiliation:
Stanford University

Abstract

Addressing the dearth of variation research in nonurban, noncoastal regions of California, this study examines the extent to which speakers in Redding, an inland community just north of the Central Valley, participate in the California Vowel Shift (CVS). We acoustically analyze the fronting of the back vowels boot and boat, the raising of ban and backing of bat, and the merger of bot and bought, in sociolinguistic interviews with 30 white lifelong residents. Results reveal a change in apparent time for all analyzed variables, indicating the CVS's progression through the community, though not as robust as in urban, coastal areas. Additionally, we provide evidence that shifting patterns for different vowels are structured by the ideological divide between town and country. Thus, as the CVS spreads through Redding, speakers utilize particular features of the shift differently, negotiating identities relevant in California's nonurban locales.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Toni Ann. (2004). From Oklahomans to “Okies”: Identity Formation in Rural California. PhD dissertation, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
Baranowski, Maciej. (2007). Phonological variation and change in the dialect of Charleston, South Carolina. Publication of the American Dialect Society. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Barras, Claude, Geoffrois, Edouard, Wu, Zhibiao, & Liberman, Mark. (2001). Transcriber: Development and use of a tool for assisting speech corpora production. Speech Communication 33:522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, John. (1983). A survey of Afro-American English. Annual Review of Anthropology 12:335354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Kara, Aden, Anna, Best, Katelyn, & Jacobson, Haley. (2015). Variation in West Coast English: The case of Oregon. Paper presented at the American Dialect Society's Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, January 8–11.Google Scholar
Bigham, Douglas S. (2005). Movement of front vowel allophones before nasal in Southern Illinois White Vernacular English. MA thesis, University of Texas–Austin.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul, & Weenink, David. (2012). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Version 5.3.07. Available at: www.praat.org. Accessed March 4, 2012.Google Scholar
Brandth, Berit. (1995). Rural masculinity in transition: Gender images in tractor advertisements. Journal of Rural Studies 11:123133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, Bermudez, Nancy, Edwards, Lisa, Fung, Victor, & Vargas, Rosalva. (2007). Hella Nor Cal or Totally So Cal?: The perceptual dialectology of California. Journal of English Linguistics 35:325352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. (2011). Intersecting variables and perceived sexual orientation in men. American Speech 86:5268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, Willard. (1993). The development of American agriculture: A historical analysis. 2nd ed.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
D'Onofrio, Annette, Eckert, Penelope, Podesva, Robert J., Pratt, Teresa, & Van Hofwegen, Janneke. (Forthcoming). Low vowel variation in California's Central Valley. In Evans, B., Fridland, V., Kendall, T., & Wassink, A. B. (eds.), Speech in the West: The Pacific Coast. Publication of the American Dialect Society. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2004). California vowels. Radio interview on All Things Considered, February 24. Available at: http://www.stanford.edu/~eckert/vowels.html. Accessed February 28, 2015.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2008a). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:453476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2008b). Where do ethnolects stop? International Journal of Bilingualism 12:2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41:87100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, Anne, Watt, Dominic, & Johnson, Daniel Ezra. (2009). A comparison of three speaker-intrinsic vowel formant frequency normalization algorithms for sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 21:413435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Edward. (2003). The relationship between coronal place and vowel backness. Phonology 20:335373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fought, Carmen. (1999). A majority sound change in a minority community: /u/-fronting in Chicano English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3:523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Aaron. (2004). Real country: Music and language in working-class culture. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie. (2008a). Patterns of /uw/, /ʊ/ and /ow/ fronting in Reno, Nevada. American Speech 83:432454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie. (2008b). Regional differences in perceiving vowel tokens on Southernness, education, and pleasantness ratings. Language Variation and Change 20:6783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, & Bartlett, Kathy. (2006). The social and linguistic conditioning of back vowel fronting across ethnic groups in Memphis, Tennessee. English Language and Linguistics 10:122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, Bartlett, Kathryn, & Kreuz, Roger. (2004). Do you hear what I hear? Experimental measurement of the perceptual salience of acoustically manipulated vowel variants by Southern speakers in Memphis, TN. Language Variation and Change 16:116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, Susan. (2013). Tastes of talk: Qualia and the moral flavor of signs. Anthropological Theory 13:3148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geenberg, Katherine. (2014). The other California: Marginalization and sociolinguistic variation in Trinity County. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Gregory, James. (1989). American exodus: The Dust Bowl migration and Okie culture in California. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guenter, Joshua, Lewis, Julie, & Urban, Margaret. (1999). A perceptual study of vowels before/r/. In Ohala, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Berkeley: Regents of the University of California.Google Scholar
Hagiwara, Robert. (1997). Dialect variation and formant frequency: The American English vowels revisited. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102:655658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. (2005). One shift, two groups: When fronting alone is not enough. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 10:105116.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. (2009). Ethnicity and phonetic variation in San Francisco English. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. (2011). The completion of a sound change in California English. In Lee, W. & Zee, E. (eds.), ICPhS XVII: Proceedings of the 17th International Congress on Phonetic Sciences. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong. 807810.Google Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren. (2013). “Flip-flop” and mergers in progress. English Language and Linguistics 17:359390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall-Lew, Lauren, & Stephens, Nola. (2012). Country talk. Journal of English Linguistics 40:256280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Warren, Paul, & Drager, Katie. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34:458484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Moonwomon, Birch, Bremner, Sue, Luthin, Herb, Van Clay, Mary, Lerner, Jean, & Corcoran, Hazel. (1987). It's not just the valley girls: A study of California English. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Washington, DC: eLanguage, the Linguistic Society of America. 117–128.Google Scholar
Holland, Cory. (2014). Shifting or shifted? The state of the California vowels. Poster presented at Sound Change in Interacting Human Systems 3rd Biennial Workshop on Sound Change, University of California, Berkeley, May 28–31.Google Scholar
Ingle, Jennifer K., Wright, Richard, & Wassink, Alicia Beckford. (2005). Pacific northwest vowels: A Seattle neighborhood dialect study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117:2459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irons, Terry Lynn. (2007). On the status of low back vowels in Kentucky English: More evidence of merger. Language Variation and Change 19:137180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., & Gal, Susan. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, P. V. (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, politics, and identities. Santa Fe: SAR Press. 3583.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Robert, & Grama, James. (2012). Chain shifting and centralization in California vowels: An acoustic analysis. American Speech 87:3956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koops, Christian. (2010). /u/-fronting is not monolithic: Two types of fronted /u/ in Houston Anglos. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 15:113–122.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word 18:142.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1991). The three dialects of English. In Eckert, P. (ed.), New Ways of analyzing sound change. New York: Academic Press. 144.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, & Boberg, Charles. (2006). The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Chapelle, Peter. (2007). Proud to be an Okie: Cultural politics, country music, and migration to Southern California. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, & Johnson, Keith. (2014). A course in phonetics. Belmont: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Little, Jo. (2002). Rural geography: Rural gender identity and the performance of masculinity and femininity in the countryside. Progress in Human Geography 26:665670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luthin, Herbert W. (1987). The story of California (ow): The coming-of-age of English in California. In Denning, K. M., Inkelas, S., McNair-Knox, F. C., & Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Variation in language: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation. Stanford: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University. 312–324.Google Scholar
McClarty, Jason, & Kendall, Tyler. (2014). The relationship between the high and mid back vowels in Oregonian English. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation 43, Chicago, Illinois, October 23–26.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma. (2008). Homegirls: Language and cultural practice among Latina youth gangs. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moonwomon, Birch. (1987). Truly awesome: (ɔ) in California English. In Denning, K. M., Inkelas, S., McNair-Knox, F. C., & Rickford, J. R. (eds.), Variation in language: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation. Stanford: Department of Linguistics, Stanford University. 325–336.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A., & Preston, Dennis. (2003). Folk linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2011). The California Vowel Shift and gay identity. American Speech 86:3251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Callier, Patrick, & Szakay, Anita. (2015). Gender differences in the acoustic realization of creaky voice: Evidence from conversational data collected in inland California. Paper presented at the Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, January 8–11.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., Eckert, Penelope, Fine, Julia, Hilton, Katherine, Jeong, Sunwoo, King, Sharese, & Pratt, Teresa. (Forthcoming). Social influences in the degree of stop voicing in inland California. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J., & Van Hofwegen, Janneke. (2014). How conservatism and normative gender constrain variation in inland California: The case of /s/. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 20:129–137.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. (1989). Perceptual dialectology. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R., Ball, Arnetha, Blake, Renee, Jackson, Raina, & Martin, Nomi. (1991). Rappin on the copula coffin: Theoretical and methodological issues in the analysis of copula variation in African-American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 3:103132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfelder, Ingrid, Fruehwald, Joe, Evanini, Keelan, & Yuan, Jiahong. (2011). FAVE (Forced Alignment and Vowel Extraction) program suite. Available at: http://fave.ling.upenn.edu. Accessed January 10, 2011.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. (1989). The implications of /o/ fronting in Wilmington, North Carolina. American Speech 64:327333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Erik R. (2001). An acoustic analysis of vowel variation in New World English. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Erik R., & Kendall, Tyler. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Available at: http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/. Accessed February 28, 2015.Google Scholar
Traunmüller, Hartmut. (1997). Auditory scales of frequency representation. Available at: http://www.ling.su.se/staff/hartmut/bark.htm. Accessed January 10, 2011.Google Scholar
Warren, Ron, & Fulop, Sean. (2014). The merged vowel of pin and pen as realized in Bakersfield, California. Poster presented at the 167th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Providence, RI, May 5–9.Google Scholar
Wassink, Alicia Beckford. (2006). A geometric representation of spectral and temporal vowel features: Quantification of vowel overlap in three linguistic varieties. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119:23342350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, John. (1982). Accents of English 3: Beyond the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Country ideology and the California Vowel Shift
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Country ideology and the California Vowel Shift
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Country ideology and the California Vowel Shift
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *