Adams, Ernest W. (1992). Grice on indicative conditionals. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 73, 1–15.Google Scholar

Allwood, Jens, Anderson, Lars-&Gunnar & Dahl, Osten (1977). Logic in linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arundale, Robert B. (1990). On Grice's new directions in ‘The way of words’: steps toward reconceptualizing Grice's Program on Meaning. Paper presented at the International Pragmatics Conference of the International Pragmatics Association, Barcelona, Spain, 9–13 July.Google Scholar

Atlas, Jay David & Levinson, Stephen C. (1981). It-clefts, informativeness, and logical form: radical pragmatics (Revised standard version). In Peter, Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 1–61. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Van Der Auwera, Johan(1982). Against ‘Against conversational implicature’. Journal of Semantics, I, 399–400.Google Scholar

Bach, Kent (1994). Conversational implicature. Mind and Language, 9, 124–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrett, R. B. & Stenner, A. J. (1971). The myth of exclusive ‘or’. Mind, 80, 116–21.Google Scholar

Barwise, Jon & Etchemendy, John (1990). The language of first-order logic. CSLI Lecture Notes Number 23. Centre for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan (1986). In the tradition of Kantotle. Times Literary Supplement, 24 October, 1196–7.Google Scholar

Bertolet, Rod (1983). Where do implicatures come from? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 13, 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blakemore, Diane (1992). Understanding utterances: an introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, ShoshanaHouse, Juliane & Kasper, Gabriele (eds.) (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: requests and apologies. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana. & Olshtain, Elite, (eds.) (1984). Pragmatics and second language learning. Special issue of Applied Linguistics, 5, 3, 187–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boer, S. & Lycan, W. (1973). Invited inferences and other unwelcome guests. Papers in Linguistics, 6, 483–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. (1988). A cross-cultural study of ability to interpret implicatures in English. World Englishes, 7, 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. (1990). The effective use of implicature in English: why and how should it be taught in the ESL classroom? In Bouton, & Kachru, (eds.), 43–51.Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. (1992). The interpretation of implicature in English by NNS: does it come automatically, without being explicitly taught? In Bouton, and Kachru, (eds.), 53–65.Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. (1994). Can NNS skill in interpreting implicature in American English be improved through explicit instruction? A pilot study. In Bouton, & Kachru, (eds.), 88–109.Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. (1994a). Conversational implicature in a second language: learned slowly when not deliberately taught. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 157–67.Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. & Kachru, Yamuna (eds.) (1990). Pragmatics and language learning. Monograph Series, Volume 1. Division of English as an International Language, Intensive English Institute: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. & Kachru, Yamuna (eds.) (1991). Pragmatics and language learning. Monograph Series, Volume 2. Division of English as an International Language, Intensive English Institute: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. & Kachru, Yamuna (eds.) (1992). Pragmatics and language learning. Monograph Series, Volume 3. Division of English as an International Language, Intensive English Institute: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. & Kachru, Yamuna (eds.) (1993). Pragmatics and language learning. Monograph Series, Volume 4. Division of English as an International Language, Intensive English Institute: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. & Kachru, Yamuna(eds.) (1994). Pragmatics and language learning. Monograph Series, Volume 5. Division of English as an International Language, Intensive English Institute: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Bouton, Lawrence F. & Kachru, Yamuna (eds.) (1995). Pragmatics and language learning. Monograph Series, Volume 6. Division of English as an International Language, Intensive English Institute: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar

Browne, Allen C. (1986). Univocal Or-again. Linguistic Inquiry, 17, 751–4.Google Scholar

Carrell, Patricia L. (1984). Inferencing in ESL: presuppositions and implications of factive and implicative predicates. Language Learning, 34, 1–21.Google Scholar

Chametzky, Robert (1992). Pragmatics, Predication and Relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 17, 63–72.Google Scholar

Chametzky, Robert (1992a). Comments on Wilson's Reply. Journal of Pragmatics, 17, 79–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charniak, E. (1972). Towards a model of children's story comprehension. MIT AI Lab Monographs, No. 226.Google Scholar

Chilton, Paul (1987). Co-operation and non-co-operation: ethical and political aspects of pragmatics. Language and Communication, 7, 221–39.Google Scholar

Clark, H. & Haviland, S. (1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. In Freedle, R. (ed.), Discourse production and comprehension, 1–40. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cohen, L.Jonathan (1971). Some remarks on Grice's views about the logical particles of natural language. In Yehoshua, Bar-Hillel (ed.), Pragmatics of natural language, 50–68. Dordrecht/Boston/London: D. Reidel Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, L.Jonathan (1977). Can the Conversationalist Hypothesis be defended? Philosophical Studies, 31, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, L.Jonathan (1994). Some steps towards a general theory of relevance. Synthese, 101, 171–85.Google Scholar

Dascal, Marcelo (1983). Pragmatics and the philosphy of mind I: Thought in language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen (ed.) (1991). Pragmatics: a reader. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fasold, Ralph (1990). The sociolinguistics of language: introduction to sociolinguistics, Volume 2. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Fogelin, Robert J. (1991). Review of Grice 1989. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 213–19.Google Scholar

Gamut, L. T. F. (1991). Logic, language, and meaning: Volume 1, Introduction to logic. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald (1979). Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition, and logical form. London/New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald (1979a). Reply to Kiefer. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 3, 375–7.Google Scholar

Gazdar, Gerald (1980). Pragmatics and logical form. Journal of Pragmatics, 4, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geis, M. & Zwicky, A. (1971). On invited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, 2, 561–6.Google Scholar

Gorayska, Barbara & Linsay, Roger (1993). The roots of relevance. Journal of Pragmatics, 19, 301–23.Google Scholar

Grandy, Richard E. (1989). On Grice on language. Journal of Philosophy, 86, 514–25.Google Scholar

Grandy, Richard E. & Warner, Richard (eds.) (1986). Philosophical grounds of rationality: intentions, categories, ends. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Green, Georgia M. (1987). Some remarks on why there is implicature. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 17, 77–92.Google Scholar

Green, Georgia M. (1989). Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Hillsdale New Jersey/Hove and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Grice, Paul (1968). Utterer's meaning, sentence meaning, and word meaning. Foundations of Language, 4, 225–42.Google Scholar

Grice, Paul (1969). Utterer's meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review, 78, 147–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, Paul (1975). Logic and conversation. In Peter, Cole & Jerry, L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: speech acts, 41–58. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grice, Paul (1978). Further notes on logic and conversation. In Peter, Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: pragmatics, 113–27. New York/San Francisco/London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grice, Paul (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grundy, Peter (1995). Doing pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Guttenplan, Samuel (1986). The language of logic: an introduction to formal logic. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Haberland, Hartmut & Jacob, L. Mey (1977). Editorial: Linguistics and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, I, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haiman, John (1983). Paratactic if-clauses. If-clause. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 263–81.Google Scholar

Harnish, Robert (1976). Logical form and implicature. In Bever, T. G., Katz, J. J. & Langendoen, D. T. (eds.), An integrated theory of linguistic ability, 313–91. Hassocks: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar

Harnish, Robert M. (ed.) (1994). Basic topics in the philosophy of language. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Harris, Sandra (1995). Pragmatics and power. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 117–35.Google Scholar

Hirschberg, Julia (1991). A theory of scalar implicature. New York/London: Garland Publishing Inc.Google Scholar

Hirst, Daniel, Leslie, Alan M. & Walker, Ralph C. S. (1989). Multiple review. Relevance: communication and cognition. Mind and Language, 4, 138–59.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. (1976). On the semantic properties of logical connectives in English. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Horn, Lawrence R. (1984). Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. In Deborah, Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: linguistic applications, 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. (1985). Metalinguistic negation and pragmatic ambiguity. Language, 61, 121–74.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. (1988). Pragmatic theory. In Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. 1. Linguistic theory: foundations, 113–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. (1990). Hamburgers and truth: Why Gricean explanation is Gricean. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Parasession on the Legacy of Grice, 454–71.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. (1992). The said and the unsaid. In Chris, Barker & David, Dowty (eds.), SALT II: Proceedings from the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory held at the Ohio State University, 1–3 May. The Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics No. 40, 163–92.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. (19920). Pragmatics, implicature, and presupposition. In William, Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Volume 3, 260–6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Huang, Yan (1991). A neo-Gricean pragmatic theory of anaphora. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 301–35.Google Scholar

Huang, Yan (1994). The syntax and pragmatics of anaphora: a study with special reference to Chinese (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hurford, James R. (1974). Exclusive or inclusive disjunction. Foundations of Language, II, 409–11.Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank (1987). Conditionals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

James, Francis (1986). Semantics and pragmatics of the word If. Journal of Pragmatics, 10, 453–80.Google Scholar

Jennings, R. E. (1995). The genealogy of disjunction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kalisz, Roman (1992). On the conversationality of implicatures. In Frens, J. H. Dols (ed.), Pragmatic grammar components, 135–42. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar

Kandolf, Cindy (1993). On the difference between explicatures and implicatures in relevance theory. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 16, 33–46.Google Scholar

Kasher, Asa (1976). Conversational maxims and rationality. In Asa, Kasher (ed.), Language in focus: foundations, methods and systems. Essays in memory of Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, 197–216. (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 43.) Dordrecht/Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Kasher, Asa (1982). Gricean inference revisited. Philosophica, 29, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kasper, Gabriele & Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (eds.) (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kemmerling, Andreas (1991). Implikatur. In Arnim, von Stechow & Dieter, Wunderlich (eds.) Semantics: an international handbook of contemporary research, 319–33. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Kempson, Ruth (1988). Grammar and conversational principles. In Newmeyer, F. J. (ed.) Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. II. Linguistic theory: extensions and implications, 139–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kiefer, Ferenc (1979). What do conversational maxims explain? Lingvisticae Investigationes, 3, 57–74.Google Scholar

Kiefer, Ferenc (1979a). A brief rejoinder. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 3, 379–81.Google Scholar

Kratzer, A. (1986). Conditionals. Papers from the Parasession on Prgamatics and Grammatical Theoty at the Twenty-second Regional Meeting of the Chicago Lingustic Society, 1–15.Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. (1979). Activity types and language. Linguistics, 17, 365–99.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Minimization and conversational inference. In Verschueren, J. & Bertuccelli-Papi, M. (eds.), The pragmatic perspective, 61–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. (1987a). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: a partial pragmatic reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics, 23, 379–434.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. (1989). A review of relevance. Journal of Linguistics, 25, 455–72.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. (1991). Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics, 27, 107–62.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. (to appear). Three levels of meaning. In Frank, Palmer (ed.), Grammar and meaning: Festschrift for John Lyons.Google Scholar

Lilje, G. (1972). Uninvited inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, 3, 540–2.Google Scholar

Loveday, L. (1983). Rhetoric patterns in conflict: the socio-cultural relativity of discourse-organising processes. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, 169–89.Google Scholar

Martinich, A. P. (1980). Conversational maxims and some philosophical problems. Philosophical Quarterly, 30, 215–28.Google Scholar

Martinich, A. P. (1984). Communication and reference. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

McCafferty, Andrew S. (1987). Reasoning about implicature: a plan-based approach. Ph. D. dissertation: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar

McCawley, James D. (1993). Everything that linguists have always wanted to know about logic* (* but were ashamed to ask). 2nd edition. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

May, John D. (1981). Practical reasoning: extracting useful information from partial informants. Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 45–59.Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. (1993). Pragmatics: an introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. (1985). Whose Language'? A study in linguistic pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. (1993d). Pragmatics in the nineties: topics, trends, perspectives. Plenary talk at the 4th International Pragmatics Conference, Kobe, Japan, 30 July.Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. (1994). Pragmatics. In Asher, R. E. and Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Volume 6, 3260–78. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. & Talbot, Mary (1988). Computation and the soul. Semiotica, 72, 291–339.Google Scholar

De Mey, Sjaak (1994). A new impetus to pragmatics. Studies in Applied Linguistics, I, 141–64.Google Scholar

Neale, Stephen (1992). Paul Grice and the philosophy of language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 509–59.Google Scholar

Nunberc, Geoffrey (1981). Validating pragmatic explanations. In Peter, Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 199–222. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Oleksy, Wieslaw (ed.) (1989). Contrastive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

O'neill, John (1988). Relevance and pragmatic inference. Theoretical Linguistics, 15, 241–61.Google Scholar

Over, D. E. (1990). Review of Grice, 1989. Philosophical Quarterly, 40, 393–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelletier, Francis Jeffrey (1977). Or. Theoretical Linguistics, 4, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Posner, Roland (1980). Semantics and pragmatics of sentence connectives in natural language. In John, R. Searle, Ference, Kiefer & Manfred, Bierwisch (eds.), Speech act theory and pragmatics, Synthese Language Library, 169–203. Dordrecht/Boston/London: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Quine, Willard Van Orman (1980). Elementary logic (revised edition), Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, Lawrence D. (1991). Relevance as an explanation of communication. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 453–72.Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey (1972). On the analyzability of stories by children. In John, Gumperz & Del, Hymes (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: the ethnography of communication, 325–45. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold (1978). On testing for conversational implicature. In Peter, Cole (ed.), Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics, 281–97. London/New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sadock, Jerrold (1986). Remarks on the paper by Deidre Wilson and Dan Sperber. Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory at the Twenty-second Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 85–90.Google Scholar

Sampson, G. (1982). The economics of conversation: comments on Joshi's paper. In Neil, Smith (ed.), Mutual knowledge, 200–10. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Sanford, David H. (1989). if P, then Q: conditionals and the foundations of reasoning. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sarangi, Srikant & Slembrouck, Stefaan (1992). Non-cooperation in communication: a reassessment of Gricean pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 17, 117–54.Google Scholar

Schroder, Kim C. (1987). Gricean implicature and the notion of ‘disinterested speech’: a belated comment on John D. May. Journal of Pragmatics, II, 513–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seuren, Pieteh A. M. (1987). The self-styling of Relevance Theory. Journal of Semantics, 5, 123–43.Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre (1986). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre (1987). Precis of ‘Relevance: communication and cognition’. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 697–754.Google Scholar

Sterelny, Kim (1982). Against conversational implicature. Journal of Semantics, I, 187–94.Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F. (1986). ‘if’ and ⊃. In Richard, E. Grandy & Richard, Warner (eds.), Philosophical grounds of rationality: intentions, categories, ends, 229–42. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Strawson, Peter F. (1990). Review of Grice, 1989. Synthese, 84, 153–61.Google Scholar

Swiggers, Pierre (1981). The supermaxim of conversation. Dialectica, 35, 303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Talbot, Mary (1994). Relevance. In Asher, R. E. & Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Volume 7, 3524–27. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, Talbot J. & Cameron, Deborah (1987). Analysing conversation: rules and units in the structure of talk. Language and Communication Library 9. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–112.Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny (1994). Conversational maxims. In Asher, R. E. & Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics: volume 2, 754–8. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny (1994a). Cooperative principle. In Asher, R. E. & Simpson, J. M. Y. (eds.), The encyclopedia of language and linguistics: volume 2, 759–62. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, Jenny (forthcoming). Meaning in interaction: an introduction to pragmatics.Google Scholar

Thomas, Richmond H. (1977). Where pragmatics fits in. In Andy, Rogers, Bob, Wall & John, P. Murphy (eds.), Proceedings of the Texas Conference on Performatives, Pre-suppositions and Implicatures, 161–6. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Thomas, Richmond H. (1990). Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In Philip, R. Cohen, Jerry, Morgan & Martha, E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, 325–63. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, James F. (1990). In Defense of ‘⊃’. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 57–70.Google Scholar

Toner, B. (1977). The facts of rape. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar

Toolan, Michael (1992). On Relevance Theory. In George, Wolf (ed.), New departures in linguistics, 146–62. London: Garland Publishing.Google Scholar

Travis, Charles (1991). Annals of analysis. Mind, 100, 237–64.Google Scholar

Tsohatzidis, Savas L. (1993). A paradox of cooperation in the conversational calculus. Language and Communication, 13, 305–9.Google Scholar

Turner, Ken (forthcoming). The principal principles of pragmatic inference: politeness.Google Scholar

Turner, Ken (forthcoming, a). Relevance: the Principal of Pragmatic Inference?Google Scholar

Walker, Ralph C. S. (1975). Conversational implicature. In Simon, Blackburn (ed.), Meaning, reference and necessity: new studies in semantics, 133–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Washington, George (1746/1988). George Washington's rules of civility and decent behaviour in company and conversation. Reprint. Boston: Applewood Books.Google Scholar

White, Alan R. (1990). Review of Grice, 1989. Philosophy, 65, 111–13.Google Scholar

Wilks, Yorick & Cunningham, Chris (1986). A purported theory of relevance. In Jacob, L. Mey (ed.) Language and discourse: test and protest. A Festschrift for Petr Sgall, 383–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Wilson, Deidre (1992). Reply to Chametsky. Journal of Pragmatics, 17, 73–7.Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (1981). On Grice's Theory of Conversation. In Paul, Werth (ed.), Conversation and discourse, 155–78. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (1984). Pragmatics: an overview. In Susan, George (ed.), From the linguistic to the social context: suggestions for interpretation, 21–41. Bologna: Editrice Clueb.Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (1986). On defining relevance. In Richard, Grandy & Richard, Warner (eds.), Philosophical grounds of rationality: intentions, categories, ends, 243–58. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (1990). Outline of Relevance theory. Hermes, 5, 35–56.Google Scholar

Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua, 87, 53–76.Google Scholar

Wirth, Jessica (1975). On the explanation of invited inferences. Clossa 9, 36–52.Google Scholar