Abbreviations: PRIPU = Progress Report, Institute of Phonetics, University of Utrecht. AIPUK = Arbeitsberichte, Institut für Phonetik, Universität Kiel. IPO = Instituut voor Perceptie Onderzoek, Eindhoven.Google Scholar

Ainsworth, W. A. (1976). Mechanisms of speech recognition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Avsnesov, R. I. (1968). Russkoe literaturnoe proiznosenie. Moskva.Google Scholar

Bansal, R. K. (1966). The intelligibility of Indian English. Ph.D thesis, University of London.Google Scholar

Barry, W. J. (1974). Language background and the perception of foreign accent. Journal of Phonetics, 2, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barry, W. J. (1975). Untersuchungen zu fremdsprachlichen Perzeptionsaufgaben. AIPUK, 16, 229–88.Google Scholar

Berkovits, R. (1980). Perceptions of intonation in native and non-native speakers of English. Language and Speech, 23, 271–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bever, Th. G. (1975). Functional explanations require independently motivated functional theories. In Grossman, R. E. et al., 580–609.Google Scholar

Bond, Z. S. (1973). Perceptual errors in ordinary speech. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, 26, 691–5.Google Scholar

Bond, Z. S. & Garnes, S. (1980). Misperceptions of fluent speech. In Cole, R. A. (ed.), 115- 32.Google Scholar

Brazil, D., Coulthard, M. & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse intonation and language teaching. London:Longman.Google Scholar

Brokx, J. P. L. & Nooteboom, S. G. (1982). Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, G. (1977). Listening to spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Brown, G., Currie, K. & Kennworthy, J. (1980). Questions of intonation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carton, F. (1974). Introduction à la phonétique du Français. Paris, Brussels, Montreal: Bordas.Google Scholar

Cherry, C. (1957, 1966). On human communication: a review, a survey, and a criticism. Cambridge, Mass.:M.I.T. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, A. (1977 a). Redundancy as a tool in listening comprehension. In Dirven, R. (ed.), 81–92.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. (1977 b). Correcting of errors ins speech shadowing task. PRIPU, 2(1977), 16–23; reprinted in Fromkin, V. A. (ed), (1980), 157–63.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. & Nooteboom, S. G. (eds.) (1975). Structure and process in speech perception. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, A. & van, den Broecke M. P. R. (eds.) (1983). Abstracts of the Tenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, R. A. (1973). Listening for mispronunciations: a measure of what we hear during speech. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 153–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, R. A. (ed.) (1980). Perception and production of fluent speech. Hilisdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cole, R. A. & Jakimik, J. (1980). A model of speech perception. In Cole, R. A. (ed.) 133–63.Google Scholar

Collier, R. & t'Hart, J. (1981). Cursus Nederlandse Intonatie. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M. (ed.) (1980). Deep dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Cooper, W. E. (1976). Syntactic control of timing in speech production: a study of complement clauses. Journal of Phonetics 4, 151–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, W. E. & Walker, E. C. T. (eds.) (1979). Sentence processing: studies presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale, New Jersey: LEA.Google Scholar

Cutter, A. (1976). Phoneme-moanitoring reaction time as a function of preceding intonation contour. Perception and Psychophysics, 20, 55–60.Google Scholar

Cutler, A. & Darwin, C. J. (1981). Phoneme-monitoring reaction time and preceding prosody: effects of stop closure duration and of fundamental frequency. Perception and Psychophysics, 29, 217- 24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cutler, A. & Foss, D. J. (1977). On the role of sentence Stress in sentence processing. Language and Speech, 20, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Darwin, C. J. (1975). On the dynamic use of prosody in speech perception. In Cohen, A. & Nooteboom, S. G. (eds.), 178–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dirven, R. (ed.) (1977). Hörverständnis im Fremdsprachenunterricht. Listening comprehension in foreign language teaching. Kronberg/Ts.: Scriptor.Google Scholar

Elsendoorn, B. A. G. (1983). Quality and quantity in English by Dutchmen: two parameters inducing Double Dutch. In van, den Broecke et al. (eds.), 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G. & Garrett, M. F. (1974). The psychology of language. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Forster, K. (1979). Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor. In Cooper, W. E. & Walker, E. C. T. (eds.), 27–85.Google Scholar

Frazier, L., Clifton, C. & Randall, J. (1983). Filling gaps: decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension. Cognition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fromkin, V. A. (ed.) (1980). Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Fry, D. B. (ed.) (1976). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

Gabka, K. (ed.) (1975). Die Russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Bd. 1: Einführung in das Studium der Russischen Sprache. Phonetik und Phonologie. Düsseldorf: Brücken-Verlag.Google Scholar

Garnes, S. & Bond, Z. S. (1980). A slip of the ear/A snip of the ear/A slip of the year? In Fromkin, (ed), 231–9.Google Scholar

Garro, L. & Parker, F. (1982). Some suprasegmental characteristics of relative clauses in English. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 149–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gary, J. & Gary, N. (1981). Caution: talking may be dangerous to your linguistic health. The case for a much greater emphasis on listening comprehension in foreign language instruction. IRAL, 19, 1, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gimson, A. C. (1978). A practical course of English pronunciation. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Gleitman, L. R. & Wanner, E. (1982). Language acquisition: the state of the art. In Wanner, E. and Gleitman, L. R. (eds.), 3–48.Google Scholar

Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition and the gating paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 267–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Grossman, R. L., James, S. & Vance, Th. (eds.) (1975). Papers from the Parasession on functionalism. Chicago, Ill.: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Halle, M. (1959). The sound pattern of Russian. 's-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1970). A course in spoken English: Intonation. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hammarström, G. (1972). Französische Phonetik. Tübingen: G. Narr-Verlag.Google Scholar

Kinsella, V. (ed.) (1982). Surveys 2. Eight state-of-the-art articles on key areas in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klein, H. W. (1963). Phonetik und Phonologie des heutigen Französisch. München: M. Hueber Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kohier, K. J. (1977). Einführung in die Phonetik des Deutschen. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar

Kohler, K. J. (1979). Parameters in the production and the perception of plosives in German and French. AIPUK, 12, 261–92.Google Scholar

Koopmans-van, Beinum F. (1983). Systematics in vowel systems. In van, den Broecke et al. , 159–71.Google Scholar

Lado, R. (1962). Language testing. The construction and use of foreign language tests. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Lass, N.J. (ed.) (1976). Contemporary issues in experimental phonetics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Leont'ev, A. A. & Samujlova, N. I. (1975). Voprosy Fonetiki I Obucenie Proiznoseniju. Moskva: Izd. MGU.Google Scholar

Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249–336.Google Scholar

Lieberman, P. (1967). Intonation, perception, and language. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.Google Scholar

Loveday, L. (1982). The sociolinguistics of learning and using a non-native language. Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English.Google Scholar

Luthy, M. J. (1983). Non-native speakers' perceptions of English ‘non-lexical’ intonation signals. Language Learning, 33, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1973). Speech shadowing and speech perception. Unpublished PhD thesis, department of Psychology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1975 a). The limited compatibility of linguistic and perceptual explanations. In Grossman, et al. (eds.) (1975), 409–20.Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1975 b). Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science, 189, 226–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1980). Speech understanding as a psychological process. In Simon, J. C. (ed), 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1983). Perceiving speech and perceiving words. In Cohen, A. & Broecke, M. P. R. van den (eds.), 39–42.Google Scholar

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. & Tyler, L. K. (1975). Processing structure of sentence perception. Nature, 257, 784–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marslen-Wilson, W. D. & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word-recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. G. (1972). Rhythmical (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behaviour. Physiological Review 79, 487–509.Google Scholar

Massaro, D. W. (1974). Perceptual units in speech recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Matthei, E. & Roeper, Th. (1983). Understanding and producing speech. London: Fontana Paperbacks.Google Scholar

Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word-recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 166–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morton, J. & Patterson, K. (1980). A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation. In Coltheart, M. (ed), 91–117.Google Scholar

Nolan, F. (1982). Speech research. Survey article in Kinsella, (ed), 61–77.Google Scholar

Nooteboom, S. G. (1983). Is speech production controlled by speech perception? In van, den Broecke et al. (eds.), 183–94.Google Scholar

Nooteboom, S. G., Eggermont, J. P. M., t'Hart, J., van, Katwijk A. F. V. & Slis, I. H. (1974). Time in speech perception. IPO Annual Progress Report, 9, 39–46.Google Scholar

Nooteboom, S. G. & Truin, G. M. (1980). Word recognition from fragments of spoken words by native and non-native listeners. IPO Annual Progress Report, 15, 42–7.Google Scholar

Oakeshott-Taylor, J. (1977). Information, redundancy, and listening comprehension. In Dirven, R. (ed.), 83–112.Google Scholar

Oakeshott-Taylor, J. (1980). Acoustic variability and its perception. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Oiler, J. W. (1974). Expectancy for successive elements: key ingredients to language use. Foreign Language Annals, 7, 443–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ottevanger, I. B. (1973). Preserved mispronunciations and the interpretation of results obtained in a shadowing task. In van, den Broecke et al. (eds.), 195–204.Google Scholar

Panov, M. V. (1967). Russkaja Fonetika. Moskva.Google Scholar

Pickett, J. M. & Pollack, I. (1963). Intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech: effects of rate of utterance and duration of excerpt. Language and Speech, 6, 151–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pilch, H. L. (1978). Auditory phonetics. Word, 29, 148–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pollack, I. & Pickett, J. M. (1963). The intelligibility of excerpts from conversation. Language and Speech, 6, 165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ringeling, J. C. T. (1979). The shadowing task and familiarity with Dutch and English. PRIPU, 4, 1, 50–61.Google Scholar

Robinson, K. L., Daniloff, R. & Green, P. (1977). Phonological ambiguity vs. the biuniqueness condition. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 377–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schaffer, D. (1983). The role of intonation as a cue to turn-taking in conversation. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schank, R. C. & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Simon, J. C. (ed.) (1980). Spoken language generation and understanding. Dordrecht: Reibel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skinner, B. F. (1936). The verbal summator and a method for the study of latent speech. Journal of Psychology, 2, 71–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sorensen, J. M. & Cooper, W. E. (1980). Syntactic coding of fundamental frequency in speech production. In Cole, R. A. (ed), 399–440.Google Scholar

Stowe, A. N. & Hampton, D. B. (1961). Speech synthesis with prerecorded syllables and words. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33,810–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strange, W., Verbrugge, R. P., Shankweiler, D. P. & Edman, T. R. (1976). Consonant environment specifies vowel identity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 213–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1976). Speech perception. In Lass, N. J. (ed.), 243–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tyler, L. K. & Wessels, J. (1983). Quantifying contextual contributions to word recognition. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 409–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Umeda, N. & Quinn, A. M. S. (1981). Word duration as an acoustic measure of boundary perception. Journal of Phonetics, 9, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Upshur, J. A. & Palmer, A. S. (1974). Measures of accuracy, communicativity, and social judgments for two classes of foreign language speakers. Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Applied Linguistics, Copenhagen 1972. Vol. 1–3; 201–221. International Association of Applied Linguistics (AILA).Google Scholar

van, Balen C. W. (1977). Different views of the problem of normalization. PRIPU, 2,32–46.Google Scholar

van, Balen C. (1983). Effects of voice adaptation on word recognition. In van, den Broecke et al. (eds.), 1–8.Google Scholar

van, Den Broecke M.P.R., van, Heuven V. & Zonneveld, W. (eds.) (1983). Sound structures. Studies for Antonie Cohen. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Voss, B. (1979). Hestitation phenomena as sources of perceptual errors for non-native speakers. Language and Speech, 22, 129–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Voss, B. (1984). Slips of the ear. Investigations into the speech perception behavior of German speakers of English. PhD dessertation, Bielefeld 1983 (to be published at Tübingen by G. Narr).Google Scholar

Wales, R. & Marshall, J. G. (1966). The organization of linguistic performance. In Lyons, J. & Wales, R. J. (eds.), Psycholinguistic Papers. The Proceedings of the 1966 Edinburgh Conference, 29–84. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. R. (eds.) (1982). Language acquisition: the state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wanner, E. & Maratsos, M. (1978). An ATN approach to comprehension. In Halle, M., Bresnan, J. & Miller, J. (eds.), Linguistic theory and psychological reality. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar

Warren, R. W. (1970). Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds. Science, 167, 392- 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Warren, R. W. (1976). Auditory illusions and perceptual processes. In Lass, N. J. (ed.), 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Warren, R. W. (1982). Auditory perception. A new synthesis. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Wingfield, A. & Klein, J. P. (1971). Syntactic structure and acoustic patterns of speech perception. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 23–5.Google Scholar