Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:25:50.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The prosody of other-repetition in British and North American English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen*
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Finland
*
Address for correspondence: Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Bogotastrasse 4, 14163Berlin, Germanyelizabeth.couper-kuhlen@helsinki.fi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores the link between prosody and other-repetition in a moderately large collection from everyday English talk-in-interaction (n = 200). British English and North American English cases were analysed separately in order to track possible varietal differences. Of initial interest was the question whether focal pitch accents might disambiguate among other-repetition actions, both those related to repair and those that go beyond repair. The results indicate that only two out of six possible other-repetition actions are associated with distinct focal pitch contours in the two varieties. For all other repair and beyond-repair actions speakers use many of the same pitch contours nondistinctively. Overall, falling contours appear more frequently in British other-repetitions, while rising contours are more frequent in North American other-repetitions. In conclusion, it is argued that in addition to pitch contour, prosodic features such as pitch span, loudness, and timing are crucial in distinguishing other-repetition actions, as are nonprosodic factors such as epistemic access (often reflected in oh-prefacing) and visible behavior. (Repair initiation, surprise, challenge, registering, pitch accents, oh-preface, epistemics)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 49 , Special Issue 4: Other-Repetition in Conversation across Languages , September 2020 , pp. 521 - 552
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful to two anonymous reviewers for constructive criticism and especially to Giovanni Rossi for help in improving this article. All remaining errors are my own.

References

Benjamin, Trevor, & Walker, Traci (2013). Managing problems of acceptability through high rise-fall repetitions. Discourse Processes 50(2):107–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight (1998). Intonation in American English. In Hirst, Daniel & di Cristo, Albert (eds.), Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages, 45–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (1986). An introduction to English prosody. London: Edward Arnold and Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2012). Some truths and untruths about final intonation in conversational questions. In de Ruiter, Jan P. (ed.), Questions: Formal, functional and interactional perspectives, 123–45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, & Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2. English translation and adaptation of Margret Selting, et al., Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2. Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 12:1–51.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan (1986/1997). Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geluykens, Ronald (1988). On the myth of rising intonation in polar questions. Journal of Pragmatics 12(4):467–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1978). Response cries. Language 54:787–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Martine, & Bauman, Stefan (2007). An introduction to intonation: Functions and models. In Trouvain, Jürgen & Gut, Ulrike (eds.), Non-native prosody: Phonetic description and teaching practice, 25–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heritage, John (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1):1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John (2012b). Beyond and behind the words: Some reactions to my commentators. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1):76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia, & Ward, Gregory (1995). The interpretation of the high-rise question contour in English. Journal of Pragmatics 24(4):407–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1972). Side sequences. In D. N. Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 294–338. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Kendrick, Kobin H. (2015). The intersection of turn-taking and repair: The timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology 6(250):1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambrecht, Knud (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Local, John (1996). Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret (eds.), Prosody in conversation, 177–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, & Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (eds.) (2012). Emotion in interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Rasmus (2015). Registering and repair-initiating repeats in French talk-in-interaction. Discourse Studies 17(5):583–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B., & Hirschberg, Julia (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, Philip R., Morgan, Jerry, & Pollack, Martha E. (eds.), Intentions in communication, 271–311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph; Greenbaum, Sidney; Leech, Geoffrey; & Svartvik, Jan (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reber, Elisabeth (2012). Affectivity in interaction: Sound objects in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2013). Epistemics, action formation, and other-initiation of repair: The case of partial questioning repeats. In Hayashi, Makoto, Raymond, Geoffrey, & Sidnell, Jack (eds.), Conversational repair and human understanding, 261–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1997). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23(3):499–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.; Jefferson;, Gail & Sacks, Harvey (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2):361–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret (1996). Prosody as an activity-type distinctive cue in conversation: The case of so-called ‘astonished’ questions in repair. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret (eds.), Prosody in conversation: Interactional studies, 231–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Gareth (2017). Visual representations of acoustic data: A survey and suggestions. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50(4):363–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Traci C., & Benjamin, Trevor (2017). Phonetic and sequential differences of other-repetitions in repair initiation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 50(4):330–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Sue, & Kitzinger, Celia (2006). Surprise as an interactional achievement: Reaction tokens in conversation. Social Psychology Quarterly 69(2):150–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar