Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:38:38.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The perlocutionary is political: Listening as self-determination in a Papua New Guinean polity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2015

James Slotta*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive, MC 0532, La Jolla, CA 92093-0532, USAjslotta@ucsd.edu

Abstract

J. L. Austin's influential dissection of speech acts into locutionary, illocutionary, and perlocutionary acts has given rise to much scholarly attention to illocutionary acts and forces. While the perlocutionary facet of speech acts has gone largely undiscussed by philosophers and linguists, folk theories of language often attend closely to the relation between speech and its consequences. In this article, I discuss one conception of perlocutions prominent in Yopno speaking communities in Papua New Guinea that emphasizes the agentive role of listeners in mediating between speech and its outcome. This cultural conception of perlocutions, I argue, is tied to a political sensibility that stresses the self-determination and equality of adult men. The article shows how cultural conceptions of perlocutions provide insight into political values and practices, and how political concerns inform folk models of perlocutions. (Perlocutions, politics, fashions of speaking, language ideology, Melanesia, Papua New Guinea)*

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (2006). Serial verb constructions in typological perspective. In Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.), Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology, 168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words: The William James lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, & Briggs, Charles L. (2000). Language philosophy as language ideology: John Locke and Johann Gottfried Herder. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 139204. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Bavelas, Janet B.; Coates;, Linda & Johnson, Trudy (2000). Listeners as co-narrators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79:941–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benhabib, Seyla (1994). Deliberative rationality and models of democratic legitimacy. Constellations 1(1):2652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenneis, Donald (1984). Grog and gossip in Bhatgaon: Style and substance in Fiji Indian conversation. American Ethnologist 11:487506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenneis, Donald (1987). Performing passions: Aesthetics and politics in an occasionally egalitarian community. American Ethnologist 14:236–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles L. (1992). Linguistic ideologies and the naturalization of power in Warao discourse. Pragmatics 2:387404.Google Scholar
Chowning, Ann (1979). Leadership in Melanesia. The Journal of Pacific History 14:6684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Ted (1973). Illocutions and perlocutions. Foundations of Language 9:492503.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1992). Intentions, self, and responsibility: An essay in Samoan ethnopragmatics. In Hill, Jane H. & Irvine, Judith T. (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse, 2447. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro, & Brenneis, Donald (eds.) (1986). Special issue on ‘The audience as co-author’. Text 6(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiske, John (1987). Television culture. New York: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. (1986). The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fontana, Benedetto; Nederman, Cary J.; & Remer, Gary (eds.) (2004). Talking democracy: Historical perspectives on rhetoric and democracy. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25/26:5680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, Robert N. (1979). Doing by saying: Toward a theory of perlocution. The Quarterly Journal of Speech 65:207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garsten, Bryan (2009). Saving persuasion: A defense of rhetoric and judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garsten, Bryan (2011). The rhetoric revival in political theory. Annual Review of Political Science 14:159–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Laurence (1983). Talk never dies: The language of Huli disputes. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In Psathas, George (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97121. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
Gu, Yueguo (1993). The impasse of perlocution. Journal of Pragmatics 20(5):405–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, Thomas (1992). Representative words: Politics, literature, and the American language, 1776–1865. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart (1980). Encoding/decoding. In Hall, Stuart, Hobson, Dorothy, Lowe, Andrew, & Willis, Paul (eds.), Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79, 117–27. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Handman, Courtney (2015). Critical Christianity: Translation and denominational conflict in Papua New Guinea. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hirschkind, Charles (2006). The ethical soundscape: Cassette sermons and Islamic counterpublics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2000). Critique of the power of judgment, ed. by Guyer, Paul. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapchan, Deborah A. (2008). The promise of sonic translation: Performing the festive sacred in Morocco. American Anthropologist 110:467–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. (1977). Propositional structure and illocutionary force: A study of the contribution of sentence meaning to speech acts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. (2006). Aristotle, on rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Konstan, David (2006). The emotions of the ancient Greeks: Studies in Aristotle and classical literature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. (1998). Arizona Tewa Kiva speech as a manifestation of a dominant language ideology. In Schieffelin, Bambi B., Woolard, Kathryn A., & Kroskrity, Paul V. (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 103–22. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. (2000a). Regimenting languages: Language ideological perspectives. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 134. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul V. (2000b). Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Kulick, Don (1992). Language shift and cultural reproduction: Socialization, self and syncretism in a Papua New Guinean village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kurzon, Dennis (1998). The speech act status of incitement: Perlocutionary acts revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 29:571–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John (1997). Locke: Political essays, ed. by Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucy, John A. (1992). Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcu, Daniel (2000). Perlocutions: The Achilles’ heel of speech act theory. Journal of Pragmatics 32:1719–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsilli-Vargas, Xochitl (2014). Listening genres: The emergence of relevance structures through the reception of sound. Journal of Pragmatics 69:4251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlan, Francesca, & Rumsey, Alan (1991). Ku Waru: Language and segmentary politics in the Western Nebilyer Valley, Papua New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Fred R. (1986). Reflections on a meeting: Structure, language, and the polity in a small-scale society. American Ethnologist 13:430–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Fred R., & Brenneis, Donald Lawrence (1984). Introduction: Language and politics in the Pacific. In Brenneis, Donald Lawrence & Myers, Fred R. (eds.), Dangerous words: Language and politics in the Pacific, 129. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew (1993). A language which defies description by ordinary means. In Foley, William A. (ed.), The role of theory in language description, 87129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew (1994). Kalam exponents of lexical and semantic primitives. In Cliff, Goddard & Wierzbicka, Anna (eds.), Semantic and lexical universals: Theory and empirical findings, 387421. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, Susan Urmston (1976). Some sources of cultural variability in the regulation of talk. Language in Society 5(1):8195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, Susan Urmston (2000). Constructing a Tongan nation-state through language ideology in the courtroom. In , Paul V., Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 229–57. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Read, K. E. (1959). Leadership and consensus in a New Guinea society. American Anthropologist 61:425–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, Joel (2001). God is nothing but talk: Modernity, language, and prayer in a Papua New Guinea society. American Anthropologist 103:901–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodman, William L. (1991). When questions are answers: The message of anthropology, according to the people of Ambae. American Anthropologist 93:421–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z. (1982). The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11:203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. (1974). Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. (1990). The give and take of everyday life: Language socialization of Kaluli children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. (2008). Speaking only your own mind: Reflections on talk, gossip and intentionality in Bosavi (PNG). Anthropological Quarterly 81:431–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B.; Woolard, Kathryn A.; & Kroskrity, Paul V. (1998). Language ideologies: Practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, Edward L. (1976). The sorrow of the lonely and the burning of the dancers. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5(1):123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven (1996). The scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuger, Debora K. (1988). Sacred rhetoric: The Christian grand style in the English renaissance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F., & Hofbauer, Carol L. (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels, 193247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1998). The uses and utility of ideology: A commentary. In Schieffelin, Bambi B., Woolard, Kathryn A., & Kroskrity, Paul V. (eds.), Language ideologies: Practice and theory, 123–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (1996). Reason and rhetoric in the philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slotta, James (2014). Revelations of the world: Transnationalism and the politics of perception in Papua New Guinea. American Anthropologist 116:626–42.Google Scholar
Stasch, Rupert (2008). Knowing minds is a matter of authority: Political dimensions of opacity statements in Korowai moral psychology. Anthropological Quarterly 81:443–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasch, Rupert (2009). Society of others: Kinship and mourning in a West Papuan place. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stasch, Rupert (2011). Ritual and oratory revisited: The semiotics of effective action. Annual Review of Anthropology 40:159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambiah, Stanley J. (1977). The galactic polity: The structure of traditional kingdoms in Southeast Asia. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 293:6997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review 66:143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vološinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wassmann, Jürg (1993). Worlds in mind: The experience of an outside world in a community of the Finisterre Range of Papua New Guinea. Oceania 64:117–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wassmann, Jürg (1994). The Yupno as post-Newtonian scientists: The question of what is ‘natural’ in spatial description. Man, New Series 29:645–66.Google Scholar
Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (1986). The study of language use in Oceania. Annual Review of Anthropology 15:149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee (1956). Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, ed. by Carroll, John B.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar