Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T11:35:49.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kinship and collective activity in the Ngayarda languages of Australia*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Alan Dench
Alan Dench
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Western Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the functions of a verbal derivational suffix found in the Ngayarda languages Panyjima, Martuthunira, Yinyjiparnti, and Kurrama. This suffix, which appears at first blush to be an essentially syntactic device very like the reciprocal suffix found in other Australian languages, may be used to indicate the existence of a particular kin relationship between participants involved in the action described by a verb. The paper presents firstly the more general functions of the suffix in the Ngayarda languages and then discusses the use of the suffix to mark kin relationships. It is argued that the general “collective activity” meaning of the suffix has generalised to the marking of certain kin relationships through the recognition that collective activity is a feature of these particular relationships. The successful analysis of the data thus relies on a knowledge of the social uses to which utterances involving the suffix are put. (Anthropological linguistics, sociolinguistics, syntactic theory, cultural anthropology, Australian linguistics)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 321 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alpher, B. (1982). Dalabon dual-subject prefixes, kinship categories, and generation skewing. In Heath et al., 1982. 19–30.Google Scholar
Dench, A. C. (1981). Panyjima phonology and morphology. Master's thesis, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Dench, A. C. (1982a). Kin terms and pronouns of the Panyjima language of northwest Western Australia. Anthropological Forum 5:105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dench, A. C. (1982b). The development of an accusative case marking pattern in the Ngayarda languages of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2:43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1980). The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, D. (1978). “Identity” amongst the Carnarvon Reserve Mob. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
Hale, K. L. (1966). Kinship reflections in syntax: Some Australian languages. Word 22:318–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J. (1982). Introduction. In Heath et al., 1982. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, J., Merlan, F., & Rumsey, A. (eds.) (1982). The languages of kinship in Aboriginal Australia. Oceania Linguistic Monograph 24. Sydney.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56:251–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, C. K. & Richards, I. A. (eds.), The meaning of meaning. 10th ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 296–336.Google Scholar
Morphy, F. (1983). Djapu, a Yolngu dialect. In Dixon, R. M. W. & Blake, B. (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages 3. Canberra: Australian National University Press. 1–188.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. (1913). Three tribes of Western Australia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 43:143–94.Google Scholar
Tonkinson, R. (1978). The Mardudjara Aborigines. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Wordick, F. J. F. (1982). The Yindjibarndi language. Pacific Linguistics C. 71. Canberra.Google Scholar