Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T11:16:39.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Generational positions at a family dinner: Food morality and social order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2011

Karin Aronsson
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Youth Studies, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Swedenkarin.aronsson@buv.su.se
Lucas Gottzén
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Swedenlucas.gottzen@liu.se

Abstract

This article concerns generation and food morality, drawing on video recordings of dinners in Swedish middle-class families. A detailed analysis of affect displays during one family dinner extends prior work on food morality (Ochs, Pontecorvo, & Fasulo 1996; Grieshaber 1997; Bourdieu 2003; Wiggins 2004), documenting ways in which participants may shift between distinct generational positions with respect to affects and food morality (from “irresponsible child” to caretaker positions). In our recordings, an elder sibling is shifting between a series of contrasting affective stances (Ochs & Schieffelin 1989; M. Goodwin 2006; Stivers 2008), linked to generational positions along an implicit age continuum: positioning himself, at one end of the continuum, as his young brother's accomplice, and at the other as an adult, a serious guardian of food morality. This study shows that generational positions are not fixed, but are positions adopted as parts of language socialization and interactional events. (Generational positions, caretaker positions, social age, affective stances, alignments, negotiations, food morality, language socialization, family life, dinnertime)*

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsand, Pål, & Aronsson, Karin (2009). Computer gaming and territorial negotiations in family life. Childhood 16:497517.Google Scholar
Aronsson, Karin (1998). Identity-in-interaction and social choreography. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31:7589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronsson, Karin , & Cekaite, Asta (2011). Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics. Discourse & Society, 22:137–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aukrust, Vibeke G., & Snow, Catherine E. (1998). Narratives and explanations during mealtime conversations in Norway and the US. Language in Society 27:221–46.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1984). Rabelais and his world. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich (1997). Democratization of the family. Childhood 4:151–66.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana (1997). Dinner talk: Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977/1991). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2003). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. New York: Routledge (French original, 1979).Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugge, Annechen Bahr, & Almås, Reidar (2005). Domestic dinner: Representations and practices of a proper meal among young suburban mothers. Journal of Consumer Culture 6:203–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capps, Lisa, & Ochs, Elinor (1995). Constructing panic: The discourse of agoraphobia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cekaite, Asta (2009). Soliciting teacher attention in an L2 classroom: Embodied actions and affective displays. Applied Linguistics 30:2648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Bronwyn, & Harré, Rom (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour 20:4363.Google Scholar
de Geer, Boel (2004). “Don't say it's disgusting!”: Comments on socio-moral behavior in Swedish families. Journal of Pragmatics 36:1705–25.Google Scholar
de Vault, Marjorie L. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring as gendered work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary (1972). Deciphering a meal. Daedalus 101:6181.Google Scholar
Edwards, Derek (2000). Extreme case formulations: Softeners, investment and doing non-literal. Research on Language and Social Interaction 33:347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fasulo, Alessandra; Loyd, Heather; & Padiglione, Vincenzo (2007). Children's socialization into cleaning practices: A cross-cultural perspective. Discourse & Society 18:1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, Lucas (2007). Homework as serious family business: Power and subjectivity in negotiations about school assignments in Swedish families. British Journal of Sociology of Education 28:209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1999). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. London: Allen Lane/Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse and Society 18:5373.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie. H. (2006). Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text and Talk 26:515–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie. H, & Goodwin, Charles (1992). Assessments and the construction of context. In Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 147–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie. H, & Goodwin, Charles (2001). Emotion within situated activity. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 239–57. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia (2003). Aligning as a team. Forms of conjoined participation in (stepfammily) interaction. Research on Language & Social Interaction 36:395431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grieshaber, Susan (1997). Mealtime rituals: Power and resistance in the construction of mealtime rules. British Journal of Sociology 48:649–66.Google Scholar
Heritage, John (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie Russell (1983/2003). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hollway, Wendy (1984). Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In Henriques, Julian, Hollway, Wendy, Urwin, Cathy, Venn, Couze, & Walkerdine, Valerie (eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity, 227–63. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
James, Alison; Jenks, Chris; & Prout, Alan (1998). Theorizing childhood. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
Johansson, Barbro (2008). Den goda måltiden: Berättelser om mat och ätande i Vi Föräldrar och Kamratposten 1969–2007 (CFK Rapport 2008:03). Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Elaine Bell (2000). Using food as a metaphor for care: Middle-school kids talk about family, school and class relationships. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 29:474509.Google Scholar
Kendall, Shari (2008). The balancing act: Framing gendered parental identities at dinnertime. Language in Society 37:539–68.Google Scholar
Kline, Stephen (2005). Countering children's sedentary lifestyles: An evaluative study of a media-risk education approach. Childhood 12:239–58.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel (1925/2002). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in Archaic societies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (1993). Constructing social identity: A language socialization perspective. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26:287306.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor; Graesch, Anthony P.; Mittmann, Angela;, Bradbury, Thomas; & Repetti, Rena (2006). Video ethnography and ethnoarchaeological tracking. In Pitt-Catsouphes, Marcie, Kossek, Ellen E., & Sweet, Stephen (eds.), Work and family handbook: Multi-disciplinary perspectives and approaches, 387409. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor; Pontecorvo, Clotilde; & Fasulo, Alessandra (1996). Socializing taste Ethnos 61:746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Schieffelin, Bambi (1989). Language has a heart. Text 9:725.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Shohet, Merav (2006). The cultural structuring of mealtime socialization. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 111:3549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, & Taylor, Carolyn (1995). The ‘father knows best’ dynamics in dinnertime narratives. In Hall, Kira & Bucholtz, Mary (eds.), Gender articulated: Language in the socially constructed self, 97120. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Orrell-Valente, Joan K.; Hill, Laura G.; Brechwald, Whitney A.; Doge, Kenneth A.; Pettit, Gregory S.; & Bates, John E. (2007). “Just three more bites”: An observational analysis of parents' socialization of children's eating at mealtime. Appetite 48:3745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pan, Barbara A.; Perlmann, Rivka Y.; & Snow, Cathrine E. (2000). Food for thought: Dinner table as a context for observing parent-child discourse. In Menn, Lise & Ratner, Nan Bernsteiner (eds.), Methods for studying language production, 205–24. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9:219–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi (1990). The give and take of everyday life: Language socialization of Kaluli children. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg (1997). Sociology of the meal. In Frisby, David & Feathersonte, Mike (eds.), Simmel on culture, 130–35. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sirota, G. K. (2006). Habits of the hearth: Children's bedtime routines as relational work, Text & Talk 26:493514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41:3157.Google Scholar
Thorsted, Stine, & Sellerberg, Ann-Marie (2006). Børn, mad og køn: Børns deltagelse i arbejde og beslutninger i familien (TemaNord 2006:519). Copenhagen: Nordisk Ministerråd.Google Scholar
Tulviste, Tiia; Mizera, Luule; de Geer, Boel; & Tryggvason, Marja-Terttu (2002). Regulatory commuents as tools of family socialization: A comparison of Estonian, Swedish and Finnish mealtime interaction. Language in Society 31:655–78.Google Scholar
Wiggins, Sally (2004). Talking about taste: Using a discursive psychological approach to examine challenges to food evaluations. Appetite 43:2938.Google Scholar
Wingard, Leah, & Forsberg, Lucas (2009). Parents' involvement in children's homework in American and Swedish dual-earner families. Journal of Pragmatics 41:1576–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar