Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T16:49:43.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The female register: an empirical study of Lakoff's hypotheses1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Faye Crosby  and
Linda Nyquist
Faye Crosby
Affiliation:
Boston University
Linda Nyquist
Affiliation:
Boston University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Sociolinguists (e.g. Swacker 1975) and anthropologists (e.g. Hall 1959) are increasingly aware of the fact that sex, like social class or subcultural group, is a variable which strongly affects speech (Thorne & Henley 1975). While sexexclusive differentiation (i.e. separate male and female languages) now appears to be an almost nonexistent phenomenon, sex-preferred differentiation seems to be widespread across a number of languages and language families (Bodine 1975). In particular, recent studies indicate that syntax (Labov 1966), intonation (Brend 1972), and pronunciation(Trudgill 1972) in spoken English all vary as a function of the sex of the speaker.

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , December 1977 , pp. 313 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bem, S. L. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31. 634–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, S. L. & Bem, D. (1971). Training the woman to know her place: The power of a nonconscious ideology. In Garskoff, M. H. (ed.), Roles women play: Readings toward women's liberation. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole. 84–96.Google Scholar
Berko-Gleason, J. (1975). Fathers and other strangers: Men's speech to young children. In Dato, D. P. (ed.), Developmental psycholinguistics: Theory and applications. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press. 289–97.Google Scholar
Bodine, A. (1975). Sex differentiation in language. In Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (eds), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House Publishers. 130–51.Google Scholar
Brend, R. M. (1971). Male—female intonation patterns in American English. Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. 866–9.Google Scholar
Broverman, I., Vogel, S., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E. & Rosenkranz, P. S. (1972). Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28 (2). 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, F. (1976). The effect of mode of interaction, sex, and acquaintance on conversation management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
Deaux, K. (1976) The behavior of men and women. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Garskof, M. H. (ed.) (1971). Roles women play: Readings toward women's liberation. Belmont, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Goldberg, P. (1968). Are women prejudiced against women? Trans-Action 5. 28–30.Google Scholar
Gornick, V. & Moran, B. K. (eds) (1971). Women in sexist society: Studies in power and powerlessness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hacker, H. M. (1951). Women as a minority group. Social Forces 30. 60–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Kramer, C. (1974). Women's speech: Separate but unequal. Quarterly Journal of Speech 60. 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. LinS 2, 45–79.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1969). The normal American family. In Sussman, M. B. (ed.), Sourcebook in marriage and the family. New York: Houghton, Mifflin and Co. 36–46.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. P. (1972). Language and social behaviour. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. S. (1972). The roots of ambivalence in American women. In Bardwick, J. M. (ed.), Readings on the psychology of women. New York: Harper and Row. 125–7.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70. 1075–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swacker, M. (1975). The sex of the speaker as a sociolinguistic variable. In Thorne, B. & Henley, N. (eds), Language and sex: Differences and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House Publishers. 130–51.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. LinS I. 179–95.Google Scholar
Weick, K. (1968). Systematic observational methods. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2). Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 357–451.Google Scholar