Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:41:11.302Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Michael Hancher
Michael Hancher
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The different taxonomies of illocutionary acts proposed by Austin, Searle, Vendler, Ohmann, and Fraser are compared in summary form, with Searle's taxonomy taken as a reference standard. All five of these taxonomies slight two kinds of illocutionary act: (I) illocutionary acts that combine commissive with directive illocutionary force (e.g., offering, inviting, challenging), and (2) illocutionary acts that require two participants (e.g., giving, selling, contracting). These and related speech acts are discussed in some detail, and Searle's classification is amended to take them into account. (Speech acts, Austin, Searle, law, contracts, English.)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , April 1979 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. (Reprinted 1965. New York: Oxford University Press.)Google Scholar
Ballentine, J. A. (1969). Ballentine's law dictionary. Rochester, N.Y.: Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Black, H. C. (1968). Black's law dictionary. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. C. (1968). Toward a workable taxonomy of illocutionary forces, and its implication to works of imaginative literature. Language and Style 8. 3–20.Google Scholar
Carroll, L. (1971). Alice in Wonderland, ed. Gray, D. J.. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Corbin, A. L. (1963). Corbin on contracts, V. I. St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1974a). An analysis of vernacular performative verbs. In Shuy, R. W. and Bailey, C.-J. N. (eds), Towards tomorrow's linguistics. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 139–58.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1974b). Review of J. Searle, Speech acts. Foundation of Language II. 433–46.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1975a). Hedged performatives. In Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds), Speech acts. (Syntax and semantics, 3.) New York: Academic Press. 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B. (1975b). Warning and threatening. Centrum 3, 169–80.Google Scholar
Garvey, C. (1975). Requests and responses in children's speech. Journal of Child Language 2. 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiser, D. J. (ed.) (1943). Corpus juris secundum, 38. New York: American Law Book Co.Google Scholar
Law Commission (1973). Report on solemnization of marriage in England and Wales. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Loftus, W. A. (1976). Form of marriage. In New Catholic Encyclopedia, 9. New York: McGraw-Hill. 276–80.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1977). Remarks on the lexicography of performative verbs. In Rogers, A., Wall, B., and Murphy, J. P. (eda), Proceedings of the Texas conference on performatives, presuppositions, and implicatures. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics. 13–25.Google Scholar
Martinich, A. P. (1975). Sacraments and speech acts, II. Heythrop J. 16. 405–17.Google Scholar
Ohmann, R. (1972). Instrumental style: Notes on the theory of speech as action. In Kachru, B. B. and Stahlke, H. F. W. (eds), Current trends in stylistics (Papers in linguistics: Monograph series, 2). Edmonton, Ill.: Linguistic Research. 115–41.Google Scholar
Robert, H. M. (1970). Robert's rules of order newly revised. New York: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Samek, R. (1965). Performative utterances and the concept of contract. Australasian J. of Phil. 43. 196–210.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R.(1975). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. In Gunderson, K. (ed.), Language, mind, and knowledge (Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science 7). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 344–69.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. LinS 5. 1–23.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1977). A classification of illocutionary acts. In Rogers, A. H., Wall, B., and Murphy, J. P. (eds), Proceedings of the Texas conference on performatives, presuppositions, and implicatures. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics. 27–45.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1970a). Les performatifs en perspective. Langages no. 17. 73–90.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1970b). Say what you think. In Cowan, J. L. (ed.), Studies in thought and language. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. 79–7.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1972). Res cogitans: an essay in rational psychology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar